It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Honey bees are critical pollinators in ecosystems and agriculture, but their numbers have significantly declined. Declines in pollinator populations are thought to be due to multiple factors including habitat loss, climate change, increased vulnerability to disease and parasites, and pesticide use. Neonicotinoid pesticides are agonists of insect nicotinic cholinergic receptors, and sub-lethal exposures are linked to reduced honey bee hive survival. Honey bees are highly dependent on circadian clocks to regulate critical behaviors, such as foraging orientation and navigation, time-memory for food sources, sleep, and learning/memory processes. Because circadian clock neurons in insects receive light input through cholinergic signaling we tested for effects of neonicotinoids on honey bee circadian rhythms and sleep. Neonicotinoid ingestion by feeding over several days results in neonicotinoid accumulation in the bee brain, disrupts circadian rhythmicity in many individual bees, shifts the timing of behavioral circadian rhythms in bees that remain rhythmic, and impairs sleep. Neonicotinoids and light input act synergistically to disrupt bee circadian behavior, and neonicotinoids directly stimulate wake-promoting clock neurons in the fruit fly brain. Neonicotinoids disrupt honey bee circadian rhythms and sleep, likely by aberrant stimulation of clock neurons, to potentially impair honey bee navigation, time-memory, and social communication.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Nashville, USA (GRID:grid.152326.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2264 7217)
2 Vanderbilt University, Department of Biological Sciences, Nashville, USA (GRID:grid.152326.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2264 7217)
3 University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Aurora, USA (GRID:grid.430503.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0703 675X)
4 University of Puerto Rico – Río Piedras, Department of Biology, San Juan, USA (GRID:grid.280412.d)
5 Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Nashville, USA (GRID:grid.152326.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2264 7217); Vanderbilt University, Department of Biological Sciences, Nashville, USA (GRID:grid.152326.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2264 7217)
6 East Tennessee State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Johnson City, USA (GRID:grid.255381.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 1673)