It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Rifampicin resistance is a major therapeutic challenge, particularly in tuberculosis, leprosy, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus infections, where it develops via missense mutations in gene rpoB. Previously we have highlighted that these mutations reduce protein affinities within the RNA polymerase complex, subsequently reducing nucleic acid affinity. Here, we have used these insights to develop a computational rifampicin resistance predictor capable of identifying resistant mutations even outside the well-defined rifampicin resistance determining region (RRDR), using clinical M. tuberculosis sequencing information. Our tool successfully identified up to 90.9% of M. tuberculosis rpoB variants correctly, with sensitivity of 92.2%, specificity of 83.6% and MCC of 0.69, outperforming the current gold-standard GeneXpert-MTB/RIF. We show our model can be translated to other clinically relevant organisms: M. leprae, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, despite weak sequence identity. Our method was implemented as an interactive tool, SUSPECT-RIF (StrUctural Susceptibility PrEdiCTion for RIFampicin), freely available at
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of Melbourne, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, Victoria, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Computational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1051.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9760 5620)
2 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Infection Biology, London, UK (GRID:grid.8991.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0425 469X)
3 University of Cambridge, Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
4 Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Computational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1051.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9760 5620); University of Melbourne, School of Computing and Information Systems, Victoria, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
5 University of Melbourne, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, Victoria, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Computational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1051.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9760 5620); University of Cambridge, Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)