It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
NASA’s Magnetospheric Multi-Scale (MMS) mission is designed to explore the proton- and electron-gyroscale kinetics of plasma turbulence where the bulk of particle acceleration and heating takes place. Understanding the nature of cross-scale structures ubiquitous as magnetic cavities is important to assess the energy partition, cascade and conversion in the plasma universe. Here, we present theoretical insight into magnetic cavities by deriving a self-consistent, kinetic theory of these coherent structures. By taking advantage of the multipoint measurements from the MMS constellation, we demonstrate that our kinetic model can utilize magnetic cavity observations by one MMS spacecraft to predict measurements from a second/third spacecraft. The methodology of “observe and predict” validates the theory we have derived, and confirms that nested magnetic cavities are self-organized plasma structures supported by trapped proton and electron populations in analogous to the classical theta-pinches in laboratory plasmas.
Magnetic cavities play important roles in the energy cascade, conversion and dissipation in turbulent plasmas. Here, the authors show a theoretical insight into magnetic cavities by deriving a self-consistent, kinetic theory of these coherent structures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Peking University, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)
2 University of California, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.19006.3e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9632 6718); Russian Academy of Sciences, Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.4886.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2192 9124)
3 University of Alberta, Department of Physics, Edmonton, Canada (GRID:grid.17089.37)
4 Shandong University, Institute of Space Sciences, Weihai, China (GRID:grid.27255.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 1174)
5 Peking University, School of Physics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)
6 Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Space Science Center, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
7 Denali Scientific, Fairbanks, USA (GRID:grid.9227.e)
8 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA (GRID:grid.133275.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 6666)
9 Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, USA (GRID:grid.201894.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0321 4125)