It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Carbon fixation is one of the most important biochemical processes. Most natural carbon fixation pathways are thought to have emerged from enzymes that originally performed other metabolic tasks. Can we recreate the emergence of a carbon fixation pathway in a heterotrophic host by recruiting only endogenous enzymes? In this study, we address this question by systematically analyzing possible carbon fixation pathways composed only of Escherichia coli native enzymes. We identify the GED (Gnd–Entner–Doudoroff) cycle as the simplest pathway that can operate with high thermodynamic driving force. This autocatalytic route is based on reductive carboxylation of ribulose 5-phosphate (Ru5P) by 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (Gnd), followed by reactions of the Entner–Doudoroff pathway, gluconeogenesis, and the pentose phosphate pathway. We demonstrate the in vivo feasibility of this new-to-nature pathway by constructing E. coli gene deletion strains whose growth on pentose sugars depends on the GED shunt, a linear variant of the GED cycle which does not require the regeneration of Ru5P. Several metabolic adaptations, most importantly the increased production of NADPH, assist in establishing sufficiently high flux to sustain this growth. Our study exemplifies a trajectory for the emergence of carbon fixation in a heterotrophic organism and demonstrates a synthetic pathway of biotechnological interest.
Current efforts to establish synthetic carbon fixation in model heterotrophs rely on expression of heterologous enzymes. Here, the authors explore the presence and activity of a latent CO2-assimilation pathway in E. coli based only on endogenous enzymes and a reversible decarboxylase.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.418390.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0491 976X)
2 Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
3 Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany (GRID:grid.419554.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0491 8361)
4 Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany (GRID:grid.419554.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0491 8361); Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Marburg, Germany (GRID:grid.452532.7)