It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The use of contextual information is an important capability to facilitate language comprehension. This can be shown by studying behavioral and neurophysiological measures of accelerated word recognition when semantically or phonemically related information is provided in advance, resulting in accompanying attenuation of the respective event-related potential, i.e. the N400 effect. Against the background of age-dependent changes in a broad variety of lexical capacities, we aimed to study whether word priming is accomplished differently in elderly compared to young persons. 19 young (29.9 ± 5.6 years) and 15 older (69.0 ± 7.2 years) healthy adults participated in a primed lexical decision task that required the classification of target stimuli (words or pseudo-words) following related or unrelated prime words. We assessed reaction time, task accuracy and N400 responses. Acceleration of word recognition by semantic and phonemic priming was significant in both groups, but resulted in overall larger priming effects in the older participants. Compared with young adults, the older participants were slower and less accurate in responding to unrelated word-pairs. The expected N400 effect was smaller in older than young adults, particularly during phonemic word and pseudo-word priming, with a rather similar N400 amplitude reduction by semantic relatedness. The observed pattern of results is consistent with preserved or even enhanced lexical context sensitivity in older compared to young adults. This, however, appears to involve compensatory cognitive strategies with higher lexical processing costs during phonological processing in particular, suggested by a reduced N400 effect in the elderly.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neurology, Motor and Cognition Group. Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6363.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 4662)
2 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neurology, Motor and Cognition Group. Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6363.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 4662); Department of Psychiatry, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6363.0)
3 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neurology, Motor and Cognition Group. Campus Benjamin Franklin (CBF), Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6363.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 4662); Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.7468.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 7639)