It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aphids are virus-spreading insect pests affecting crops worldwide and their fast population build-up and insecticide resistance make them problematic to control. Here, we aim to understand the molecular basis of spotted alfalfa aphid (SAA) or Therioaphis trifolii f. maculata resistance in Medicago truncatula, a model organism for legume species. We compared susceptible and resistant near isogenic Medicago lines upon SAA feeding via transcriptome sequencing. Expression of genes involved in defense and stress responses, protein kinase activity and DNA binding were enriched in the resistant line. Potentially underlying some of these changes in gene expression was the finding that members of the MYB, NAC, AP2 domain and ERF transcription factor gene families were differentially expressed in the resistant versus susceptible lines. A TILLING population created in the resistant cultivar was screened using exome capture sequencing and served as a reverse genetics tool to functionally characterise genes involved in the aphid resistance response. This screening revealed three transcription factors (a NAC, AP2 domain and ERF) as important regulators in the defence response, as a premature stop-codon in the resistant background led to a delay in aphid mortality and enhanced plant susceptibility. This combined functional genomics approach will facilitate the future development of pest resistant crops by uncovering candidate target genes that can convey enhanced aphid resistance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, Australia; Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Bentley, Australia (GRID:grid.1032.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0375 4078)
2 The Australian National University, Biological Data Science Institute, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.1001.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 7477)
3 CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, Australia (GRID:grid.1001.0)
4 CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.493032.f)
5 CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, Australia (GRID:grid.493032.f)
6 CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, Australia (GRID:grid.493032.f); Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Bentley, Australia (GRID:grid.1032.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0375 4078); University of Western Australia, The UWA Institute of Agriculture, Crawley, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)
7 CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2); Curtin University, Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Bentley, Australia (GRID:grid.1032.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0375 4078); University of Western Australia, The UWA Institute of Agriculture, Crawley, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)