It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Receptive field (RF) size and preferred spatial frequency (SF) vary greatly across the primary visual cortex (V1), increasing in a scale invariant fashion with eccentricity. Recent studies reveal that preferred SF also forms a fine-scale periodic map. A fundamental open question is how local variability in preferred SF is tied to the overall spatial RF. Here, we use two-photon imaging to simultaneously measure maps of RF size, phase selectivity, SF bandwidth, and orientation bandwidth—all of which were found to be topographically organized and correlate with preferred SF. Each of these newly characterized inter-map relationships strongly deviate from scale invariance, yet reveal a common motif—they are all accounted for by a model with uniform spatial pooling from scale invariant inputs. Our results and model provide novel and quantitative understanding of the output from V1 to downstream circuits.
Two-photon imaging in macaque V1 captured maps of tuning selectivity for four spatial parameters, all of which correlated with peak spatial frequency. These inter-map relationships reveal a common motif—they are described by uniform spatial pooling from a family of scale invariant Gabor receptive fields.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Texas, Department of Psychology, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364); University of Texas, Department of Neuroscience, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364); University of Texas, Center for Perceptual Systems, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364)
2 University of Texas, Department of Psychology, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364); University of Texas, Center for Perceptual Systems, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364)
3 University of Texas, Department of Neuroscience, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364); University of Texas, Center for Learning and Memory, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.55460.32) (ISNI:0000000121548364)