It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers are used in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to reduce the harmful effects of excessive adrenergic activation on the heart. However, there is limited evidence regarding the benefit of beta-blockers in the context of contemporary management following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used the nationwide South Korea National Health Insurance database to identify 87,980 patients with a diagnosis of either acute myocardial infarction (AMI; n = 38,246) or angina pectoris (n = 49,734) who underwent PCI between 2013 and 2017, and survived to be discharged from hospital. Beta-blockers were used in a higher proportion of patients with AMI (80.6%) than those with angina (58.9%). Over a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range 1.2–3.3 years) with the propensity-score matching analysis, the mortality risk was significantly lower in patients treated with a beta-blocker in the AMI group (HR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.69–0.87; p < 0.001). However, the mortality risk was comparable regardless of beta-blocker use (HR: 1.07; 95% CI 0.98–1.16; p = 0.10) in the angina group. The survival benefit associated with beta-blocker therapy was most significant in the first year after the AMI event.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.267370.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0533 4667)
2 University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea (GRID:grid.267370.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0533 4667)
3 Gachon University, Department of Applied Statistics, Seongnam-si, Korea (GRID:grid.256155.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0647 2973)
4 Sungkyunkwan University, Department of Cardiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.264381.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 989X)
5 Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Sejong, Korea (GRID:grid.254230.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0722 6377)