It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The lower Brahmaputra River in Bangladesh and Northeast India often floods during the monsoon season, with catastrophic consequences for people throughout the region. While most climate models predict an intensified monsoon and increase in flood risk with warming, robust baseline estimates of natural climate variability in the basin are limited by the short observational record. Here we use a new seven-century (1309–2004 C.E) tree-ring reconstruction of monsoon season Brahmaputra discharge to demonstrate that the early instrumental period (1956–1986 C.E.) ranks amongst the driest of the past seven centuries (13th percentile). Further, flood hazard inferred from the recurrence frequency of high discharge years is severely underestimated by 24–38% in the instrumental record compared to previous centuries and climate model projections. A focus on only recent observations will therefore be insufficient to accurately characterise flood hazard risk in the region, both in the context of natural variability and climate change.
This study investigates flood hazards of the Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh. Based on a tree ring reconstruction of seasonal river discharge, climate modelling, and historic documentation of flood events, the authors suggest flood hazard risk is underestimated by ~24–38% in the present day compared to the past 700 years.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Tree Ring Laboratory, Palisades, USA (GRID:grid.473157.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9175 9928); Columbia University, Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729)
2 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Tree Ring Laboratory, Palisades, USA (GRID:grid.473157.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9175 9928)
3 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, USA (GRID:grid.419078.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2284 9855); Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Ocean & Climate Physics, Palisades, USA (GRID:grid.473157.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9175 9928)
4 University of New South Wales, ARC Centre of Excellence in Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)
5 Columbia University, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729)
6 University of Arizona, School of Geography and Development, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X)
7 Columbia University, Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729)
8 Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China (GRID:grid.440686.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0543 8253)
9 Georgia Institute of Technology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943)