It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Tunneling is a fundamental quantum process with no classical equivalent, which can compete with Coulomb interactions to give rise to complex phenomena. Phosphorus dopants in silicon can be placed with atomic precision to address the different regimes arising from this competition. However, they exploit wavefunctions relying on crystal band symmetries, which tunneling interactions are inherently sensitive to. Here we directly image lattice-aperiodic valley interference between coupled atoms in silicon using scanning tunneling microscopy. Our atomistic analysis unveils the role of envelope anisotropy, valley interference and dopant placement on the Heisenberg spin exchange interaction. We find that the exchange can become immune to valley interference by engineering in-plane dopant placement along specific crystallographic directions. A vacuum-like behaviour is recovered, where the exchange is maximised to the overlap between the donor orbitals, and pair-to-pair variations limited to a factor of less than 10 considering the accuracy in dopant positioning. This robustness remains over a large range of distances, from the strongly Coulomb interacting regime relevant for high-fidelity quantum computation to strongly coupled donor arrays of interest for quantum simulation in silicon.
Coupled donor wavefunctions in silicon are spatially resolved to evidence valley interference processes. An atomic-scale understanding of the interplay between interference, envelope anisotropy and crystal symmetries unveils a placement strategy compatible with existing technology where the exchange is insensitive to interference.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 The University of New South Wales, Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, School of Physics, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)
2 Purdue University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197)
3 The University of Melbourne, Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, School of Physics, Parkville, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); The University of Melbourne, School of Computing and Information Systems, Melbourne School of Engineering, Parkville, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
4 Purdue University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197); The University of New South Wales, School of Physics, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)
5 The University of Melbourne, Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, School of Physics, Parkville, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)