It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Perinatal piglet mortality is an important factor in pig production from economic and animal welfare perspectives; however, the statistical analysis of mortality is difficult because of its categorical nature. Recent studies have suggested that a binomial model for the survival of each specific piglet with a logit approach is appropriate and that recursive relationships between traits are useful for taking into account non-genetic relationships with other traits. In this study, the recursive binomial model is expanded in two directions: (1) the recursive phenotypic dependence among traits is allowed to vary among groups of individuals or crosses, and (2) the binomial distribution is replaced by the multiplicative binomial distribution to account for over or underdispersion. In this study, five recursive multiplicative binomial models were used to obtain estimates of the Dickerson crossbreeding parameters in a diallel cross among three varieties of Iberian pigs [Entrepelado (EE), Torbiscal (TT), and Retinto (RR)]. Records (10,255) from 2110 sows were distributed as follows: EE (433 records, 100 sows), ER (2336, 527), ET (942, 177), RE (806, 196), RR (870, 175), RT (2450, 488), TE (193, 36), TR (1993, 359), and TT (232, 68). Average litter size [Total Number Born (TNB)] and number of stillborns (SB) were 8.46 ± 2.27 and 0.25 ± 0.72, respectively. The overdispersion was evident with all models. The model with the best fit included a linear recursive relationship between TNB and the logit of
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universidad de Zaragoza, Departamento de Anatomía Embriología y Genética Animal, Instituto Agrolimentario de Aragón (IA2), Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain (GRID:grid.11205.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 8769)
2 Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries, Genètica i Millora Animal, Lleida, Spain (GRID:grid.8581.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 1943 6646)
3 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Bellaterra, Spain (GRID:grid.7080.f)
4 INGA FOOD S.A. (Nutreco), Programa de Mejora Genética “Castúa”, Almendralejo, Spain (GRID:grid.7080.f)
5 Universitat Politècnica de València, Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Valencia, Spain (GRID:grid.157927.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1770 5832)