It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Play is a strong outwardly directed, emotional behaviour and can contagiously spread between individuals. It has been suggested that high-playing animals could ‘seed’ play in others, spreading positive affective states. Despite the current interest in play contagion there has been no previous attempt to measure the strength of the play contagion effect. The calf (Bos taurus) is ideal for testing the strength of play contagion as play in calves is strongly related to energy intake from milk. We manipulated play in calves through their milk allowances and housed the calves in uniform groups all on the same milk allowance (high = UHigh or low = ULow) or in mixed groups with calves in the same group receiving either a high (= MHigh) or low (= MLow) milk allowance. We measured locomotor play using accelerometers on two consecutive days when calves were four and eight weeks old, in order to study play contagion over a protracted developmental window. We anticipated that differences in the level of play contagion between treatment groups would result in difference in the play levels observed in the MLow and ULow individuals. Contrary to our expectations we found that spontaneous play was suppressed in the high-milk calves housed in mixed groups (MHigh), in comparison to calves housed with group mates all receiving high-milk (UHigh). These results are the first to quantify a negative play contagion effect, particularly in a situation of long-term contact, and may suggest that negative contagion has a stronger effect on play behaviour than positive contagion.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.5173.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2298 5320); Recipient of a DOC-Fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.4299.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2169 3852)
2 Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.426884.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0170 6644); University of Edinburgh, Roslin Institute, Penicuik, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988)
3 University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Vienna, Austria (GRID:grid.5173.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2298 5320)
4 Czech University of Life Sciences, Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Prague, Czechia (GRID:grid.15866.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 631X); Institute of Animal Science, Department of Ethology, Prague, Czechia (GRID:grid.419125.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1092 3026)