It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The distribution of neurons in the cortex (cytoarchitecture) differs between cortical areas and constitutes the basis for structural maps of the human brain. Deep learning approaches provide a promising alternative to overcome throughput limitations of currently used cytoarchitectonic mapping methods, but typically lack insight as to what extent they follow cytoarchitectonic principles. We therefore investigated in how far the internal structure of deep convolutional neural networks trained for cytoarchitectonic brain mapping reflect traditional cytoarchitectonic features, and compared them to features of the current grey level index (GLI) profile approach. The networks consisted of a 10-block deep convolutional architecture trained to segment the primary and secondary visual cortex. Filter activations of the networks served to analyse resemblances to traditional cytoarchitectonic features and comparisons to the GLI profile approach. Our analysis revealed resemblances to cellular, laminar- as well as cortical area related cytoarchitectonic features. The networks learned filter activations that reflect the distinct cytoarchitecture of the segmented cortical areas with special regard to their laminar organization and compared well to statistical criteria of the GLI profile approach. These results confirm an incorporation of relevant cytoarchitectonic features in the deep convolutional neural networks and mark them as a valid support for high-throughput cytoarchitectonic mapping workflows.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Univ. Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Cécile and Oskar Vogt Institute of Brain Research, Düsseldorf, Germany; Max Planck School of Cognition, Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.4372.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2105 1091)
2 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Jülich, Germany (GRID:grid.8385.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 375X)
3 Institute of Computational Biology, München, Germany (GRID:grid.4567.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0483 2525)
4 Univ. Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Cécile and Oskar Vogt Institute of Brain Research, Düsseldorf, Germany (GRID:grid.8385.6); Max Planck School of Cognition, Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.4372.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2105 1091); Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Jülich, Germany (GRID:grid.8385.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 375X)