Good Practices in Perinatal Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Report from Task-Force RISEUP-PPD COVID-19

Abstract

[...]the COVID-19 pandemic represents a particularly challenging circumstance for PPW with potential adverse outcomes on maternal mental health. [...]meta-analysis evidence makes it clear that the “objective and subjective social isolation” influences physical and mental health similar to that of well-known biomedical risk factors (e.g., tobacco consumption, lack of physical activity) (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015). [...]the unpredictable situation of being unemployer with a reduced household income can be considered a very stressful event that can lead to psychologicaistress (Sareen et al., 2011). [...]a study carrieut in north-eastern Italy found higher levels of depressive symptomatology in the immediate postpartum period among women who gave birth during an active periof COVID-19 quarantine than in women whose delivery occurred in the same perione year earlier (Zanardo et al., 2020). [...]this issue constitutes another critical gap te addressed, specifically on how preventive measures involving confinement and sociaistancing may affect PPW and their newborns in terms of their mental well-being and their access to the adequate prenatal and postnatal care they need aneserve.

Introduction

Due to the changes that occur to the immunity and physiological state of women during pregnancy, they are at increased risk of suffering issues with both their physical and mental health (Liu et al., 2020). It is estimated that 1 in 5 women develop a mental health problem in the perinatal period (Hahn-Holbrook et al., 2018; World Health Organization, 2015), with depression and anxiety among the most prevalent conditions (Shorey et al., 2018). Importantly, these conditions have long lasting adverse effects on women and their babies, and place a heavy burden on families and society as a whole (Bauer et al., 2014; Gavin et al., 2005). Conditions such as extreme stress, conflict situations, emergencies, and naturaisasters can increase the risk of developing specific mental illnesses (World Health Organization, 2016).

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), declared a global pandemic on March 11 by the World Health Organization, is currently cited as a significant cause of stress and anxiety for pregnant and postpartum women (PPW) around the world (Chen et al., 2020), taking into account that these women constitute one of the most vulnerable populations in the world. Although formal evidence about the perinatal aspects of COVID-19 remains scarce, recent clinicaata suggest that the impact on physical health is not as negative as previously thought (Mullins et al., 2020). Pregnant women and newborns are not at increased risk of getting infecter having worse symptoms or consequences than the general population (Chen et al., 2020).

However, the extraordinary circumstances of the COVID-19 outbreak and the imposed social confinement measures are particularly challenging for PPW and may impact their psychological well-being. In addition to the expected concerns about their own health, risk of infection and transmission of the virus to the baby, sudden changes in perinatal healthcare (e.g., modifications of scheduled appointments, restrictions on the partner’s presence during childbirth and postnatal visitation) woulikely contribute to increased psychologicaistress.

Taking into account the aforementioned reasons, the Riseup-PPD project “Research Innovation and Sustainable Pan-European Network in Peripartum Depression Disorder” (Cost Action 18138), foundey the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union, decided to create the “Perinatal Mental Health and COVID-19 epidemic” task force to promote best practices in maternal mental health that may mitigate the impact of COVID-19 management on women’s mental health. Within this framework, we provide a brief review on a) impacts of the pandemic and confinement during COVID-19 lockdown on PPW an) characteristics of the women who are most vulnerable to the psychological impact of COVID-19. Basen this review, we recommend good psychological practices and points to consider in conducting research that coule implemented to mitigate the negative consequences of such a pandemic.

How Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Perinatal Mental Health?;

Being pregnant and having a baby are often positive events that are characterizey feelings of joy, delight, and fulfilment. However, during their transition to parenthood, some PPW may also experience a range of negative emotions (Topalidou et al., 2020). Additionally, exposure to stressful situations, such as emergencies, infectious diseases, and naturaisasters, may lead to a heightened risk of mental health problems in the perinatal period (Thapa et al., 2020).

Clearly, the rapid spreaf the COVID-19 virus in the absence of targeted therapies or a vaccine is placing unprecedented stress on PPW. One of the central emotional responses during a pandemic is “fear”. The “threat” of being infecter consequences to foetaevelopment and the “lack of information” or misinformation contribute to additional stress that would negatively affect the mother’s mental health.

Evidence from past infectious outbreaks (e.g., SARS, MERS) suggests that some common psychological reactions that might manifest during the current health crisis, including confusion, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and sleep problems, which are likely to persist in the subsequent months (Rogers et al., 2020). Limited research on the psychological impact of COVID-19 in PPW has been published so far, but the findings consistently indicate negative effects on perinatal mental health. For example, in a survey of Chinese residents early during the COVID-19 outbreak, 17% of respondents reported moderate to severe depression levels, whereas 29% reported experiencing moderate to severe anxiety symptoms (Wang et al., 2020). This study also found that females presented significantly higher prevalence of psychologicaistress than male respondents.

Therefore, the COVID-19 pandemic represents a particularly challenging circumstance for PPW with potential adverse outcomes on maternal mental health. In this regard, a study conducted in China found a significant increase in the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant women after the official announcement of the COVID-19 outbreak by the Chinese government (Wu et al., 2020a). In a Canadian study, pregnant participants also reported clinically relevant levels of psychologicaistress, such as depression (37%), general anxiety (57%), and pregnancy-specific anxiety (68%) symptoms, that were substantially higher than the findings from previous community pregnancy cohorts presenting similar demographic characteristics (Lebel et al., 2020). Another study of Turkish pregnant women showed elevated scores in depression and anxiety screening instruments, with 35% of participants presenting symptoms of depression at a clinicaevel (Duranku & Aksu, 2020). Finally, in an Italian survey, the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak was also classified as severe by 53% of the pregnant participants, and two-thirds of the respondents were experiencing higher than normal anxiety levels (Saccone et al., 2020).

How Does Confinement during the COVID-19 Lockdown Affect Perinatal Mental Health?;

Confinement during the COVID-19 lockdown, which includes restrictions on social contact, leisure and work activities, is crucial for controlling the spreaf the virus; however, these measures lead to reduced physical interactions animited access to social support, increasing the sense of isolation anoneliness (Tull et al., 2020), which may place these women at risk for mental health problems. In fact, meta-analysis evidence makes it clear that the “objective and subjective social isolation” influences physical and mental health similar to that of well-known biomedical risk factors (e.g., tobacco consumption, lack of physical activity) (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2015). The sociaistancing that is universally recommendey governments around the world may be especially problematic during perinatal perioecause “social support” has a well-recognized role in buffering the negative effects of stress (Reid & Taylor, 2015).

In the case of PPW, these preventive measures result in additional “disruption” of the expected “routine of prenatal and postnatal care” for the mother and the baby, such as cancelled appointments, restrictions on the presence of a support person, reports of poorer quality of the prenatal care received, changes in birth plans (e.g., type of delivery, location), or reduced access to healthcare services (Lebel et al., 2020).

Additionally, “losing access to mental health support”, along with the loss of positive activities, may increase vulnerability to mental health problems during COVID-19 lockdown. Confinement may be responsible for the worsening of pre-existing mentaisorders in PPW due to the reduced access to regular outpatient visits anecause of high susceptibility to stress compared with those of the general population (Yao et al., 2020).

The restriction of living in close quarters with children and partners can also “increase conflict” and interfere with adapting tife with a new infant (Lebel et al., 2020). A relevant risk during a pandemic and its socially disruptive response is the potential “increase in intimate partner violence” (van Gelder et al., 2020).

Additionally, the COVID-19 lockdown has economic consequences. The inability to work has immediate economic repercussions, with several families experiencing “unemployment and reduced income” during this period. Although the literature is not consistent in this regard, a meta-analysis showed that reduced income had a small correlation with perinataepressive symptoms (Lancaster et al., 2010), and we can speculate about the indirect impact of these changes on mental health. In fact, the unpredictable situation of being unemployer with a reduced household income can be considered a very stressful event that can lead to psychologicaistress (Sareen et al., 2011).

A recent review showed that people who haeen quarantineuring previous infectious outbreaks reported worse psychological health as a result of the quarantine experience, including depression and anxiety symptoms, irritability, acute stress, fear, confusión, and sleep problems (Brooks et al., 2020). Similarly, a study carrieut in north-eastern Italy found higher levels of depressive symptomatology in the immediate postpartum period among women who gave birth during an active periof COVID-19 quarantine than in women whose delivery occurred in the same perione year earlier (Zanardo et al., 2020).

Therefore, this issue constitutes another critical gap te addressed, specifically on how preventive measures involving confinement and sociaistancing may affect PPW and their newborns in terms of their mental well-being and their access to the adequate prenatal and postnatal care they need aneserve.

Which PPW Are more Vulnerable to Psychological Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic?;

In fact, not all women are equally affectey mental health problems during the perinatal period. Several factors appear to account for these differences, and when present, they emerge as risk factors for psychological problems. This is particularly relevant considering the present pandemic, in order to identify an at-risk population anesign effective and tailored intervention programmes.

Some authors note stressfuife events, a lack of social support, previous history of mentaisorders, early life adversity anomestic violence as the main predictors of psychological problems in pregnancy (Class et al., 2011; Lancaster et al., 2010). Pregnancy often reactivates conflicts experienced in childhood and adulthood, making these women more vulnerable as they feeess prepared for the changes related to pregnancy and motherhood (Mathibe-Neke et al., 2014).

There is compelling evidence demonstrating that high anxiety anepression during pregnancy is one of the strongest risk factors for postpartum depression (Verreault et al., 2014). Therefore, the highly stressful experience of the current COVID-19 pandemic may increase the risk of developing a mental health problem postpartum.

According to studies on natural and man-made disasters, experiencing a disaster first-hand appears to have direct negative consequences on the psychologicaevef pregnant women (Badakhsh et al., 2010). A study developeuring the current COVID-19 pandemic reported that primiparous mothers ageess than 35 years, with pre-pregnancy underweight, employed full-time with a middle income, who had a per capita living area of = 20 m², and with decreased physical activity were those at increased risk of depression (Wu et al., 2020b). Because of this, mothers who are infecter have high exposure to COVID-19 coule the most vulnerable to psychological problems.

What Are the Good Psychological Practices in Perinatal Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic?;

Several key features of psychological care may alleviate the negative impact of COVID-19 in PPW and promote resilience during and after such a stressful period (see Table 1).

Table 1 Good Psychological Practices in Perinatal Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic

It is important to ensure that PPW have access to “accurate and understandable information” from reliable sources about the COVID-19 disease, preventive measures, and any new procedures applied to antenatal and postnatal care. Inadequate and insufficient information might have exacerbated people’s fears and emotional reactions in past infectious outbreaks (Brooks et al., 2020; Inter-Agency Standing Committee, 2020). Clear and effective health communication may help to reduce psychologicaistress, while maximizing adherence to the recommended safety measures and promoting engagement in more adaptive behaviours (Finset et al., 2020; Perrin et al., 2009). For example, knowing more about the potential effects of the infection on PPW and newborns may help to reduce the psychologicaistress associated with concerns about physical health, the risk of transmission of the virus to the baby, and the safety of breastfeeding practices.

It is recommended to provide clear “information on the expected psychological reactions (fear and emotionaistress)” to the COVID-19 pandemic (Orrù et al., 2020). Professional communication with PPW shoule supportive and empathic, including listening to them carefully, showing understanding of their feelings, and asking about their immediate needs and concerns and how to address them. Most of the symptoms of distress these women may be experiencing are common psychological reactions under the current outbreak and consequentiaisruptions in plans and expectations regarding the transition to motherhood (Inter-Agency Standing Committee, 2020; World Health Organization, 2016). It is essential to monitor any emotional alterations, especially in infected PPW, and those who may have increased vulnerability to psychological problems, in order to prevent the development of intense anong-lasting forms of distress.

Assessing whether an individual has adequate “social support” and encouraging regular contact with close relatives and friends, via telephone, social media or video calls, helps them tetter cope with subjective isolation, and may still constitute an important resource for their needs of emotional and social support during the perinatal period (Inter-Agency Standing Committee, 2020; World Health Organization, 2016). The “partner or close family members” are an important part of this process and shoule involved in promoting psychological well-being throughout this very demanding period. Despite the unique circumstances that, for medical reasons, may require temporary separation of the mother from their newborn, physical and affective interactions between the parents and the infant shoule allowed from birth, as much as possible (World Health Organization, 2015).

Another action that may be taken to attenuate the emotionaistress experienced is to facilitate “sources of self-help” and, when necessary, self-referral tocal psychological assistance (Orrù et al., 2020). Alternative online channels of communication were created to make psychological support available to those in need anisseminate informative self-help materials to provide tools to manage the emotional challenges emerging due to the COVID-19 pandemic (Orrù et al., 2020). PPW should alse encouraged to identify and employ “positive coping strategies” (e.g., engage in pleasant activities such as reading, cooking, self-care, mindfulness) and avoid negative strategies or behaviours to manage their emotions and reduce stress. This way, they may regain the sense of controost during the current outbreak and engage more actively in problem-solving (World Health Organization, 2016). It is also important to maintain, as much as possible, an active daily routine and healthy sleep and eating habits.

PPW should continue te “screened for perinatal mental morbidity” (for example, by using validated self-report questionnaires, such as the Edinburgh Postnataepression Scale "EPDS", Patient Health Questionnaire "PHQ-9" or the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale "GAD-7"), and have access to specialized mental health services in case they need any advice or support. Due to the increased risk of intimate partner violence (domestic violence) in PPW during the pandemic (Usher et al., 2020; van Gelder et al., 2020), “screening for intimate partner violence” as a part of routine antenatal and postnatal care is also recommended.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, prenatal and psychological services have been rapidly changing from face-to-face tnline (Aziz et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020). For example, two hospitals and an affiliated clinic in New York City offered telehealth prenatal appointments during the COVID-19 outbreak. The telehealth prenatal care was specially tailored for high-risk pregnancies (e.g., hypertensive disorders, gestationaiabetes, foetal conditions or mental illness). Regarding mental health support, they proposed a prior in-person session before starting the telehealth to ensure clinician-patient alliance. If there were specific concerns about domestic violence or any abusive relationship in the home environment, these issues woule discussed in this initial session as well (Aziz et al., 2020). Additionally, access to psychosocial support groups shoule provided, even as an online service. Three maternity units of APHP Sorbonne University in Paris implemented an intervention programme aimed to reduce postpartum women’s psychological vulnerability, in which psychological support was provided through telephone interviews at days 10-12 postpartum with a follow-up 6-8 weeks later (Viaux et al., 2020). Health professionals would alsenefit from up-to-date and evidence-based recommendations to provide “high-quality e-mental health and telepsychotherapy” (Van Daele et al., 2020) and training courses that may guide them to provide adequate support for the specific emotional and psychological needs PPW may have as a demanf the current health crisis (Orrù et al., 2020).

Additionally, “special attention” shoule devoted to those PPW with “pre-existing mental health problems” and ensure that mental health professionals work in close collaboration with families and partners to raise awareness of the importance of early detection of psychological problems and seeking support. Hermann et al.(2020) recommended that PPW with histories of moor anxiety disorders use preventive psychotherapies via online platforms and encouraged professional societies tevelop online psychoeducational materials. In this case, minimizing the stigma associated with mentaisorders is also needed (Yao et al., 2020).

Basen currently available data, prolonged “skin-to-skin contact” and early and exclusive “breastfeeding” remain the best strategies for reducing the risks of morbidity and mortality for both the mother with COVID-19 and her baby (Thi Tran et al., 2020). Previous studies have shown that both are protective factors for postpartum depression (Dennis & McQueen, 2009; Groer & Davis, 2006; Kendall-Tackett et al., 2011). Thus, it is also recommended, whenever possible.

The inevitable consequences on the family and financial concerns may act as stressors in the post-lockdown period, possibly contributing to the deterioration of psychological well-being in PPW (Brooks et al., 2020). Therefore, in a longer-term context, mental health difficulties shoule closely monitored, and any case of significant psychologicaistress shoule referred to specialized treatment. Simultaneously, effective interventions shoule designed to foster positive structures and social resources aimed to promote sustained mental health and resilience during stressful events.

Points to Consider in Conducting Research on Good Practices in Perinatal Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mental health requires further investigation to inform best practices in perinatal mental health care. Hence, considering the evidence presented in the sections above, the following research issues in perinatal mental health (PMH) constitute important topics te examined.

Assessing the broaefinition of psychologicaistress. Research on perinatal mental health should address the full realm of psychologicaistress, with a focus on depression and anxiety, which are the most prevalent psychologicaisorders in the perinatal period (Kendig et al., 2017).

Effects of physicaistancing and social isolation. As mentioned above to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, governments have instructed physicaistancing and home isolation. These measures may elevate feelings of loneliness and social isolation, which are associated with negative mental health outcomes (Stephenson, 2020) and may be associated with negative social relationships at home (Usher et al., 2020). On the other hand, as many partners are staying at home, a woman’s perceived practical and emotional support may increase (Dennis & Ross, 2006; Pilkington et al. 2016). These complex relationships should, therefore, be assessed through research tetter inform best practices in perinatal mental health.

Barriers to seeking help. Seeking mental health treatment in the perinatal period is important to reduce distress, yet many women do not seek help (Bina, 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic may have increasearriers to seeking help due to home isolation (Holmes et al., 2020), or lower screening rates due to minimization of contacts with and shortage of healthcare providers (Rocca-Ihenacho & Alonso, 2020; Thapa et al., 2020). Nonetheless, these restrictions may bring around new opportunities in the form of digital mental health screening and treatment (Zhou et al., 2020). Therefore, the use and effectiveness of digital mental health treatment shoule assessed and compared to that of traditional mental health treatment. Additionally, new pathways of seeking treatment shoule investigated in light of the mentioned changes.

Changes in perinatal healthcare practices. These changes, which include, for instance, hospital restrictions on partner and relative visits during and after delivery or moving to remote consultations with healthcare providers (Thapa et al., 2020), may elevate levels of distress for women (Holmes et al., 2020). Factors that could reduce these negative consequences shoule investigated. Furthermore, addressing women’s mental health states in healthcare facilities, such as hospitals or OB/GYN clinics, is crucial for prolonged positive mental health (Zhou et al., 2020), and their effects on perinatal women’s mental health shoule assessed.

Assessment of the impact of COVID-19 in the perinatal period. As far as we know, only one questionnaire, the Coronavirus Perinatal Experiences Impact Survey (COPE-IS), has been developed to assess the experiences of PPW in the time of the COVID-19 (Thomason et al., 2020). At present, COPE-IS, originally written in English, has been translated tther languages (for example, German, Portuguese, and Spanish). Psychometric properties for the measure have yet te established, and scoring procedures have yet te determined. Researchers should culturally adapt the questionnaire tther countries anevelop a study of psychometric properties to improve the reliability of their results (AERA, APA, & NCMC, 2014; Mokkink et al., 2010).

Although it has spread around the planet, the COVID-19 pandemic had significant different consequences in different countries, indicating a need for comparable international studies that could provide evidence-based practices and inform current and future actions worldwide. Finally, complementary to that, all research recommendations should also address differences in perinatal experiences between women from different minority anisadvantaged populations, as there are various disparities which require culturally adaptive interventions (Priebe et al., 2012). For instance, these include populations who not have smartphones or computers and therefore require non-digitaased communication (Galea et al., 2020).

Conclusion

At this time, only a few studies have been publishen the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health. The scarce evidence indicates negative effects on PPW mental health. Thus, we need to further strengthen research to provide an evidence-based foundation for preventing and treating the psychological consequences of COVID-19 in women during the perinatal period. It is essential to support a woman’s transition to motherhood in a positive and healthy way, enabling access to adequate perinatal mental health services. Perinatal mental health professionals are more necessary than ever. Indeed, a recent review synthesised the main challenges and questions te approached in the fielf perinataepression and the main lines of action that shoule taken within the Riseup-PPD cost action (Fonseca et al., 2020). These gaps become more evident in the presence of a social and health crisis that poses tremendous psychologicaemands in women already experiencing a very vulnerable and critical period, as is the case of pregnancy and postpartum. Innovative research in this field is very important to find ways to alleviate and properly manage the effects of pandemic and further risk to women’s mental health, not only in response to the current infectious outbreak but also applicable to any future emergency crisis. Meanwhile, in the absence of such formal evidence, adverse effects on mental health due to the pandemic period shoule recognized as a vital public health concern, along with proper care and support to prevent any negative impact.

Acknowledgements

Goce Kalcev (MD) was participating in the writing of this paper, in the framework of the International Ph.D. in Innovation Sciences and Technologies at the University of Cagliari, Italy.

Funding: This paper is part of the COST Action Riseup-PPD CA 18138 and was supportey COST under COST Action Riseup-PPD CA18138.

Para citar este artículo: Motrico, E., Mateus, V., Bina, R., Felice, E., Bramante, A., Kalcev, G., Mauri, M., Martins, S., & Mesquita, A. (2020). Good practices in perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A report from task-force RISEUP-PPD COVID-19. Clínica y Salud, 31(3), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.5093/clysa2020a26

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Councin Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.) (AERA, APA, & NCMC, 2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.

Aziz, A., Zork, N., Aubey, J. J., Baptiste, C. D., D’Alton, M. E., Emeruwa, U. N., Friedman, A. M. (2020). Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journaf Perinatology, 37(08), 800–808. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712121

Badakhsh, R., Harville, E., & Banerjee, B. (2010). The childbearing experience during a naturaisaster. JOGNN - Journaf Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 39(4), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01160.x

Bauer, A., Parsonage, M., Knapp, M., Lemmi, V., & Adelaja, B. (2014). The costs of perinatal mental health problems. LSE & Centre for Mental Health, 1-44.

Bina, R. (2020, February 1). Predictors of postpartum depression service use: A theory-informed, integrative systematic review. Women anirth, 33(1), e24-e32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.01.006

Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020, March 14). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8

Class, Q. A., Lichtenstein, P., Långström, N., & D’Onofrio, B. M. (2011). Timing of prenatal maternal exposure to severaife events and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A population study of 2.6 million pregnancies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 73(3), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31820a62ce

Chen, H., Guo, J., Wang, C., Luo, F., Yu, X., Zhang, W., Li, J., Zhao, D., Xu, D., Gong, Q., Liao, J., Yang, H., Hou, W., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potentiaf COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. The Lancet, 395(10226), 809-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3

Dennis, C. L., & McQueen, K. (2009). The relationship between infant-feeding outcomes and postpartum depression: A qualitative systematic review. Pediatrics, 123(4), e736-e751. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1629

Dennis, C. L., & Ross, L. (2006). Women’s perceptions of partner support and conflict in the development of postpartum depressive symptoms. Journaf Advanced Nursing, 56(6), 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04059.x

Duranku, F., & Aksu, E. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety anepressive symptoms in pregnant women: A preliminary study. The Journaf Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. Publishenline. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1763946

Finset, A., Bosworth, H., Butow, P., Gulbrandsen, P., Hulsman, R. L., Pieterse, A. H., Street, R., Tschoetschel, R., & van Weert, J. (2020, May 1). Effective health communication – a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(5), 873-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027

Fonseca, A., Ganho-Ávila, A., Lambregtse-van den Berg, M., Lupattelli, A., Rodriguez-Muñoz, M. de la F., Ferreira, P., Radoš, S. N., & Bina, R. (2020). Emerging issues and questions on peripartum depression prevention, diagnosis and treatment: A consensus report from the cost action riseup-PPD. Journaf Affective Disorders, 274, 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.112

Fuchs, K. M., Goffman, D., Gyamfi-Bannerman, C., Haythe, J. H., LaSala, A. P., Madden, N., Miller, E. C., Miller, R. S., Monk, C., Moroz, L., Ona, S., Ring, L. E., Sheen, J. J., ... Friedman, A. M. (2020). Telehealth for high-risk pregnancies in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journaf Perinatology, 37(08), 800-808. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712121

Galea, S., Merchant, R. M., & Lurie, N. (2020, June 1). The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physicaistancing: The need for prevention and early intervention. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(6), 817-818. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562

Gavin, N. I., Gaynes, B. N., Lohr, K. N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Gartlehner, G., & Swinson, T. (2005). Perinataepression. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 106(5, Part 1), 1071-1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db

Groer, M. W., & Davis, M. W. (2006). Cytokines, infections, stress, anysphoric moods in breastfeeders and formula feeders. JOGNN - Journaf Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 35(5), 599-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00083.x

Hahn-Holbrook, J., Cornwell-Hinrichs, T., & Anaya, I. (2018). Economic and health predictors of national postpartum depression prevalence: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of 291 studies from 56 countries. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00248

Hermann, A., Fitelson, E. M., & Bergink, V. (2020). Meeting maternal mental health Needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Psychiatry. Publishenline J. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1947

Holmes, E. A., O’Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L., Bullmore, E. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. The Lancet. Psychiatry, 7(6), 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352

Inter-Agency Standing Committee. (2020). Addressing mental mealth and psychosocial aspects of Covid-19 outbreak (version 1.5). https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novelcoronavirus-2019

Kendall-Tackett, K., Cong, Z., & Hale, T. W. (2011). The effect of feeding methon sleep duration, maternal well-being, and postpartum depression. Clinicaactation, 2(2), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1891/215805311807011593

Kendig, S., Keats, J. P., Hoffman, M. C., Kay, L. B., Miller, E. S., Moore Simas, T. A., Frieder, A., Hackley, B., Indman, P., Raines, C., Semenuk, K., Wisner, K. L., & Lemieux, L. A. (2017). Consensus bundle on maternal mental health. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001902

Lancaster, C. A., Gold, K. J., Flynn, H. A., Yoo, H., Marcus, S. M., & Davis, M. M. (2010, January 1). Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. American Journaf Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.09.007

Lebel, C., MacKinnon, A., Bagshawe, M., Tomfohr-Madsen, L., & Giesbrecht, G. (2020). Elevateepression and anxiety among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic (PsyArXiv Preprints). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdhkt

Liu, H., Wang, L. L., Zhao, S. J., Kwak-Kim, J., Mor, G., & Liao, A. H. (2020, June 1). Why are pregnant women susceptible to COVID-19?; An immunological viewpoint. Journaf Reproductive Immunology, 139, 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2020.103122

Mathibe-Neke, J. M., Rothberg, A., & Langley, G. (2014). The perception of midwives regarding psychosocial risk assessment during antenatal care. Health SA Gesondheid, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v19i1.742

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & De Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An internationaelphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8

Mullins, E., Evans, D., Viner, R. M., O’Brien, P., & Morris, E. (2020). Coronavirus in pregnancy anelivery: Rapid review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 55(5), 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22014

Orrù, G., Ciacchini, R., Gemignani, A., & Conversano, C. (2020). Perspective article: Psychological intervention measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 76-79.

Perrin, P. C., McCabe, O. L., Everly, G. S., & Links, J. M. (2009). Preparing for an influenza pandemic: Mental health considerations. Prehospital anisaster Medicine, 24(3), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00006853

Pilkington, P., Milne, L., Cairns, K., & Whelan, T. (2016). Enhancing reciprocal partner support to prevent perinataepression and anxiety: A Delphi consensus study. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0721-0

Priebe, S., Matanov, A., Schor, R., Straßmayr, C., Barros, H., Barry, M. M., Díaz-Olalla, J. M., Gabor, E., Greacen, T., Holcnerová, P., Kluge, U., Lorant, V., Moskalewicz, Schene, A. H., Macassa, G., & Gaddini, A. (2012). Good practice in mental health care for socially marginalised groups in Europe: A qualitative study of expert views in 14 countries. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-248

Reid, K. M., & Taylor, M. G. (2015). Social support, stress, and maternal postpartum depression: A comparison of supportive relationships. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.009

Rocca-Ihenacho, L., & Alonso, C. (2020). Where do women birth during a pandemic?; Changing perspectives on safe motherhoouring the COVID-19 pandemic. Journaf Global Health Science, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.35500/jghs.2020.2.e4

Rogers, J. P., Chesney, E., Oliver, D., Pollak, T. A., McGuire, P., Fusar-Poli, P., Zandi, M. S., Lewis, G., & David, A. S. (2020). Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(7), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0

Saccone, G., Florio, A., Aiello, F., Venturella, R., Chiara De Angelis, M., Locci, M., Bifulco, G., Zullo, F., & Di Spiezio Sardo, A. (2020). Psychological impact of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women. The American Journaf Obstetrics & Gynecology, 223(2), 293-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.003

Sareen, J., Afifi, T. O., McMillan, K. A., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2011). Relationship between household income and mentaisorders: Findings from a population-baseongitudinal study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(4), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.15

Shorey, S., Chee, C. Y. I., Ng, E. D., Chan, Y. H., Tam, W. W. S., & Chong, Y. S. (2018). Prevalence and incidence of postpartum depression among healthy mothers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journaf Psychiatric Research, 104, 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.001

Stephenson, J. (2020). In time of sociaistancing, report’s call for health care system to address isolation anoneliness among seniors resonates. JAMA Health Forum, 1(3), e200342–e200342. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAHEALTHFORUM.2020.0342

Thapa, S. B., Mainali, A., Schwank, S. E., & Acharya, G. (2020). Maternal mental health in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 99(7), 817-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13894

Thi Tran, H., Thi Kim Nguyen, P., Thi Li, H., Hoang Minh Le, C., Giang, H. T. N., Nguyen Thi Thu, P., & Murray, J. (2020). Appropriate care for neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 disease. Acta Paediatrica, 109(9), 1713-1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15413

Thomason, M. E., Graham, A., & Vantieghem, M. R. (2020). COPE: Coronavirus Perinatal Experiences - Impact Survey (COPE-IS). Retrieved from osf.io/uqhcv

Topalidou, A., Thomson, G., & Downe, S. (2020). COVID-19 and maternal mental health: Are we getting the balance right?; (April 6, 2020). MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047969

Tull, M. T., Edmonds, K. A., Scamaldo, K. M., Richmond, J. R., Rose, J. P., & Gratz, K. L. (2020). Psychologicautcomes associated with stay-at-home orders and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on daily life. Psychiatry Research, 289, 113098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113098

Usher, K., Bhullar, N., Durkin, J., Gyamfi, N., & Jackson, D. (2020). Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability and reduceptions for support. International Journaf Mental Health Nursing, 29(4), 549-552. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12735

Van Daele, T., Karekla, M., Kassianos, A. P., Compare, A., Haddouk, L., Salgado, J., Ebert, D. D., Trebbi, G., Bernaerts, S., Van Assche, E., & De Witte, N. A. J. (2020). Recommendations for policy and practice of telepsychotherapy and e-mental health in Europe aneyond. Journaf Psychotherapy Integration, 30(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000218

van Gelder, N., Peterman, A., Potts, A., O’Donnell, M., Thompson, K., Shah, N., & Oertelt-Prigione, S. (2020, April 1). COVID-19: Reducing the risk of infection might increase the risk of intimate partner violence. EClinicalMedicine, 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100348

Verreault, N., Da Costa, D., Marchand, A., Ireland, K., Dritsa, M., & Khalifé, S. (2014). Rates and risk factors associated with depressive symptoms during pregnancy and with postpartum onset. Journaf Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 35(3), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2014.947953

Viaux, S., Maurice, P., Cohen, D., & Jouannic, J. M. (2020, June 1). Giving birth under lockdown during the COVID-19 epidemic. Journaf Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 49(6), 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101785

Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journaf Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729

World Health Organization. (2015). Maternal mental health. WHO.

World Health Organization. (2016). Psychosocial support for pregnant women and for families with microcephaly anther neurological complications in the context of Zika virus Interim guidance for health-care providers. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/204492/WHO_ZIKV_MOC_16.6_eng.pdf?;sequence=1, accessed 14 May 2020

Wu, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, H., Duan, C.-C., Li, C., Fan, J.-X., Li, H., Chen, L., Xu, H., Li, X., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, X., Li, J., Whang, Y., You, Y., Li, H., Yang, S., Tao, X., ... Huang, H. F. (2020a). Perinataepression of women along with 2019 novel coronavirus breakout in China. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3539359

Wu, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, H., Duan, C., Li, C., Fan, J., Li, H., Chen, L., Xu, H., Li, X., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, X., Li, J., Zhang, T., You, Y., Li, H., Yang, S., Tao, X., ... Huang, H. (2020b). Perinataepressive and anxiety symptoms of pregnant women along with COVID-19 outbreak in China. American Journaf Obstetrics and Gynecology, 223(2), 240.e1-240.e9. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.009

Yao, H., Chen, J. H., & Xu, Y. F. (2020, April 1). Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(4): e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30090-0

Zanardo, V., Manghina, V., Giliberti, L., Vettore, M., Severino, L., & Straface, G. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID-19 quarantine measures in northeastern Italy on mothers in the immediate postpartum period. International Journaf Gynecology & Obstetrics, 150(2), 184-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13249

Zhou, X., Snoswell, C. L., Harding, L. E., Bambling, M., Edirippulige, S., Bai, X., & Smith, A. C. (2020). The role of telehealth in reducing the mental health burden from COVID-19. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26(4), 377-379. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0068