Abstract

Dogs (Canis familiaris) are the first animals to be domesticated by humans and the only ones domesticated by mobile hunter-gatherers. Wolves and humans were both persistent, pack hunters of large prey. They were species competing over resources in partially overlapping ecological niches and capable of killing each other. How could humans possibly have domesticated a competitive species? Here we present a new hypothesis based on food/resource partitioning between humans and incipient domesticated wolves/dogs. Humans are not fully adapted to a carnivorous diet; human consumption of meat is limited by the liver’s capacity to metabolize protein. Contrary to humans, wolves can thrive on lean meat for months. We present here data showing that all the Pleistocene archeological sites with dog or incipient dog remains are from areas that were analogous to subarctic and arctic environments. Our calculations show that during harsh winters, when game is lean and devoid of fat, Late Pleistocene hunters-gatherers in Eurasia would have a surplus of animal derived protein that could have been shared with incipient dogs. Our partitioning theory explains how competition may have been ameliorated during the initial phase of dog domestication. Following this initial period, incipient dogs would have become docile, being utilized in a multitude of ways such as hunting companions, beasts of burden and guards as well as going through many similar evolutionary changes as humans.

Details

Title
Excess protein enabled dog domestication during severe Ice Age winters
Author
Lahtinen, Maria 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Clinnick, David 2 ; Mannermaa Kristiina 3 ; Sakari, Salonen J 4 ; Viranta Suvi 5 

 Finnish Food Authority, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.425556.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9987 9641); University of Helsinki, Laboratory of Chronology, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071) 
 University of Durham, Department of Archaeology, Durham, UK (GRID:grid.8250.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 8700 0572); Saint Mary’s College of California, Department of Biology, Moraga, USA (GRID:grid.421780.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0561 0551) 
 University of Helsinki, Department of Cultures, Archaeology, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071); University of Tartu, Archaeology Department, Institute of History and Archaeology, Tartu, Estonia (GRID:grid.10939.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 7661) 
 University of Helsinki, Department of Geosciences and Geography, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071); University of Bordeaux, EPOC, UMR 5805, Pessac, France (GRID:grid.412041.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2106 639X) 
 University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071) 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2476048942
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.