It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Degradability of organic matter (OM) in soil depends on its spatial location in the soil matrix. A recent breakthrough in 3D-localization of OM combined dual-energy X-ray CT-scanning with OsO4 staining of OM. The necessity for synchrotron-based µCT and the use of highly toxic OsO4 severely limit applications in soil biological experiments. Here, we evaluated the potential of alternative staining agents (silver nitrate, phosphomolybdenic acid (PMA), lead nitrate, lead acetate) to selectively enhance X-ray attenuation and contrast of OM in CT volumes of soils containing specific mineral soil particle fractions, obtained via lab-based X-ray µCT. In comparison with OsO4, administration of Ag+ and Pb2+ resulted in insufficient contrast enhancement of OM versus fine silt (< 20 µm) or clay (< 2 µm) mineral particles. The perfusion procedure used in this work induced changes in soil structure. In contrast, PMA staining resulted in a selective increase of OM’s attenuation contrast, which was comparable to OsO4. However, OM discrimination from other soil phases remained a challenge. Further development of segmentation algorithms accounting for grey value patterns and shape of stained particulate OM may enable its automated identification. If successful in undisturbed soils, PMA staining may form an alternative to OsO4 in non-synchrotron based POM detection.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Ghent University, Research Group of Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management, Department of Environment, Gent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798)
2 British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK (GRID:grid.474329.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 5915)
3 Ghent University, Research Group of Soil Physics, Department of Environment, Gent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798)
4 Ghent University, Radiation Physics Research Group-UGCT, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Gent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798)
5 Ghent University, PProGRess-UGCT, Department of Geology, Ghent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798); Utrecht University, Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5477.1) (ISNI:0000000120346234)