It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is known to inhibit breast cancer in the rat. Here we investigated whether DHA itself or select metabolites can account for its antitumor action. We focused on metabolites derived from the lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway since we previously showed that they were superior anti-proliferating agents compared to DHA; 4-OXO-DHA was the most potent. A lipidomics approach detected several LOX-metabolites in plasma and the mammary gland in rats fed DHA; we also identified for the first time, 4-OXO-DHA in rat plasma. In a reporter assay, 4-OXO-DHA and 4-HDHA were more effective activators of PPARɣ than DHA. In breast cancer cell lines, 4-OXO-DHA induced PPARɣ and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) but inhibited the activity of NF-κB and suppressed PI3K and mTOR signaling. Because of the structural characteristics of 4-OXO-DHA (Michael acceptor), not shared by any of the other hydroxylated-DHA, we used MS and showed that it can covalently modify the cysteine residue of NF-κB. We have also shown that the chemopreventive effect of DHA is associated with significant reduction of PGE2 levels, in both rat mammary tumors induced by MNU and non-involved mammary tissues. Collectively, our results indicate that 4-OXO-DHA is the metabolite of choice in future chemoprevention studies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Pennsylvania State University, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, Hershey, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
2 Colorado State University, Cancer Prevention Laboratory, Fort Collins, USA (GRID:grid.47894.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8083)
3 Pennsylvania State University, Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
4 Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Hershey, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
5 Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Hershey, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
6 Pennsylvania State University, Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, College of Medicine, Hershey, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
7 Pennsylvania State University, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Hershey, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)