It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) is a distinctive type of neovascular age-related macular degeneration prevalent in many Asian countries. However, there is still some controversy in how the subtypes of PCV are classified. This post-hoc study redefined the branching vascular network (BVN) and PCV subtypes through retrospective review of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and fluorescein angiography images from two observational studies (RENOWNED/REAL). Of the visual outcomes for each angiographic subtype and treatment pattern investigated, BVN was identified in 56.3% of PCV patients. The proportions and features of the re-defined PCV subtypes were 43.8%, 10.4%, and 45.8% for subtype A (without distinctive features of BVN), B (with BVN but no leakage), and C (with BVN and leakage), respectively. Subtype A had better visual outcomes when compared to subtype C. This possibly resulted from a better baseline visual acuity in subtype A. Moreover, combination therapy [photodynamic therapy plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)] may lead to better visual improvement than mono-anti-VEGF treatment alone. This study provides the prevalence of PCV subtypes in Taiwan and may serve as a reference for PCV treatment strategies in a real-world setting, especially for the combination therapy and patients without distinctive features of BVN.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Keelung City, Taiwan
2 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Keelung City, Taiwan; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Taoyuan City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.454210.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1756 1461)
3 Changhua Christian Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Changhua City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.413814.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0572 7372)
4 Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.415755.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 0483)
5 National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.412094.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0572 7815)
6 Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Novartis Taiwan, Taipei City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.412094.a)