It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Soil microbial communities represent the largest biodiversity on Earth, holding an important role in promoting plant growth and productivity. However, the knowledge about how soil factors modulate the bacteria community structure and distribution in tropical regions remain poorly understood, mainly in different cowpea producing ecoregions belonging to Northeastern Brazil. This study addressed the bacterial community along three different ecoregions (Mata, Sertão, and Agreste) through the16S rRNA gene sequencing. The results showed that soil factors, such as Al3+, sand, Na+, cation exchange excel, and total organic C, influenced the bacterial community and could be a predictor of the distinct performance of cowpea production. Also, the bacterial community changed between different ecoregions, and some keystone groups related to plant-growth promotion, such as Bradyrhizobium, Bacillales, Rhizobiales, and Solibacillus, were correlated to cowpea yield, so revealing that the soil microbiome has a primordial role in plant productivity. Here, we provide evidence that bacterial groups related to nutrient cycling can help us to increase cowpea efficiency and we suggest that a better microbiome knowledge can contribute to improving the agricultural performance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Federal University of Piauí, Soil Quality Lab, Agricultural Science Center, Teresina, Brazil (GRID:grid.412380.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2176 3398)
2 University of Sao Paulo, Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, Piracicaba, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722)
3 Federal University of Ceará, Laboratório de Ecologia Microbiana e Biotecnologia, Fortaleza, Brazil (GRID:grid.8395.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 0329)
4 Federal University of Ceará, Soil Science Department, Fortaleza, Brazil (GRID:grid.8395.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 0329)
5 Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil (GRID:grid.472958.5)
6 Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza, João Pessoa, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145)