It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Understanding habitat-level variation in community structure provides an informed basis for natural resources’ management. Reef fishes are a major component of tropical marine biodiversity, but their abundance and distribution are poorly assessed beyond conventional SCUBA diving depths. Based on a baited-video survey of fish assemblages in Southwestern Atlantic’s most biodiverse region we show that species composition responded mainly to the two major hard-bottom megahabitats (reefs and rhodolith beds) and to the amount of light reaching the bottom. Both megahabitats encompassed typical reef fish assemblages but, unexpectedly, richness in rhodolith beds and reefs was equivalent. The dissimilar fish biomass and trophic structure in reefs and rhodolith beds indicates that these systems function based on contrasting energy pathways, such as the much lower herbivory recorded in the latter. Rhodolith beds, the dominant benthic megahabitat in the tropical Southwestern Atlantic shelf, play an underrated role as fish habitats, and it is critical that they are considered in conservation planning.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia and SAGE/COPPE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.8536.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 473X)
2 Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Ecologia Aquática e Educação Ambiental, Três Rios, Brazil (GRID:grid.412391.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 1523 2582)
3 Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação Marinha, Porto Seguro, Brazil (GRID:grid.473011.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 4685 7624)
4 Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Laboratório de Pesquisa de Elasmobrânquios, São Vicente, Brazil (GRID:grid.410543.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 478X)
5 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação Marinha, Instituto Do Mar, Santos, Brazil (GRID:grid.411249.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0514 7202)
6 Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil (GRID:grid.412371.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 4168)




