It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Decreasing floral resources as a result of habitat loss is one of the key factors in the decline of pollinating insects worldwide. Understanding which plants pollinators use is vital to inform the provision of appropriate floral resources to help prevent pollinator loss. Using a globally important pollinator, the honeybee, we show how changes in agricultural intensification, crop use and the spread of invasive species, have altered the nectar and pollen sources available in the UK. Using DNA metabarcoding, we analysed 441 honey samples from 2017 and compared these to a nationwide survey of honey samples from 1952. We reveal that shifts in major plants foraged by honeybees are driven by changes in the availability of these plants within the landscape. Improved grasslands are the most widespread habitat type in the UK, and management changes within this habitat have the greatest potential to increase floral resource availability.
Laura Jones et al. compare honey samples across the UK from 2017 to a nationwide survey of honey samples from 1952 in order to determine how nectar and pollen sources have changed over time. They find that shifts in major plants foraged by honeybees are driven by changes in the availability of these plants within the landscape, and focus on improved grasslands as the most widespread habitat type and a potential target for management efforts to increase floral resource availability.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 National Botanic Garden of Wales, Llanarthne, UK (GRID:grid.499399.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9539 5260); MEFGL, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000000118820937)
2 Centre for Environmental and Climate Research / Aquatic Ecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
3 MEFGL, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000000118820937)
4 National Botanic Garden of Wales, Llanarthne, UK (GRID:grid.499399.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9539 5260)
5 National Botanic Garden of Wales, Llanarthne, UK (GRID:grid.499399.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9539 5260); IBERS, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK (GRID:grid.493538.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 015X)