It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The modern nitrogen cycle consists of a web of microbially mediated redox transformations. Among the most crucial reactions in this cycle is the oxidation of ammonia to nitrite, an obligately aerobic process performed by a limited number of lineages of bacteria (AOB) and archaea (AOA). As this process has an absolute requirement for O2, the timing of its evolution—especially as it relates to the Great Oxygenation Event ~ 2.3 billion years ago—remains contested and is pivotal to our understanding of nutrient cycles. To estimate the antiquity of bacterial ammonia oxidation, we performed phylogenetic and molecular clock analyses of AOB. Surprisingly, bacterial ammonia oxidation appears quite young, with crown group clades having originated during Neoproterozoic time (or later) with major radiations occurring during Paleozoic time. These results place the evolution of AOB broadly coincident with the pervasive oxygenation of the deep ocean. The late evolution AOB challenges earlier interpretations of the ancient nitrogen isotope record, predicts a more substantial role for AOA during Precambrian time, and may have implications for understanding of the size and structure of the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle through geologic time.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X); Tokyo Institute of Technology, Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105)
2 Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
3 University of California, Davis, Department of Plant Biology, Davis, USA (GRID:grid.27860.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9684); Joint BioEnergy Institute, Department of Energy, Feedstocks Division, Emeryville, USA (GRID:grid.451372.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 8980); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)