It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Twin-field (TF) quantum key distribution (QKD) is highly attractive because it can beat the fundamental limit of secret key rate for point-to-point QKD without quantum repeaters. Many theoretical and experimental studies have shown the superiority of TFQKD in long-distance communication. All previous experimental implementations of TFQKD have been done over optical channels with symmetric losses. But in reality, especially in a network setting, the distances between users and the middle node could be very different. In this paper, we perform a proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of TFQKD over optical channels with asymmetric losses. We compare two compensation strategies, that are (1) applying asymmetric signal intensities and (2) adding extra losses, and verify that strategy (1) provides much better key rate. Moreover, the higher the loss, the more key rate enhancement it can achieve. By applying asymmetric signal intensities, TFQKD with asymmetric channel losses not only surpasses the fundamental limit of key rate of point-to-point QKD for 50 dB overall loss, but also has key rate as high as 2.918 × 10−6 for 56 dB overall loss. Whereas no keys are obtained with strategy (2) for 56 dB loss. The increased key rate and enlarged distance coverage of TFQKD with asymmetric channel losses guarantee its superiority in long-distance quantum networks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Toronto, Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Department of Physics, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
2 University of Toronto, Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Department of Physics, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938); University of Waterloo, Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Waterloo, Canada (GRID:grid.46078.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 8644 1405)
3 University of Toronto, Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
4 University of Toronto, Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Department of Physics, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938); University of Toronto, Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938); University of Hong Kong, Department of Physics, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.194645.b) (ISNI:0000000121742757)