It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Defining priority areas and risk evaluation is of utmost relevance for endangered species` conservation. For the blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus), we aim to assess environmental habitat selection drivers, priority areas for conservation and overlap with vessel traffic off northern Chilean Patagonia (NCP). For this, we implemented a single-step continuous-time correlated-random-walk model which accommodates observational error and movement parameters variation in relation to oceanographic variables. Spatially explicit predictions of whales’ behavioral responses were combined with density predictions from previous species distribution models (SDM) and vessel tracking data to estimate the relative probability of vessels encountering whales and identifying areas where interaction is likely to occur. These estimations were conducted independently for the aquaculture, transport, artisanal fishery, and industrial fishery fleets operating in NCP. Blue whale movement patterns strongly agreed with SDM results, reinforcing our knowledge regarding oceanographic habitat selection drivers. By combining movement and density modeling approaches we provide a stronger support for purported priority areas for blue whale conservation and how they overlap with the main vessel traffic corridor in the NCP. The aquaculture fleet was one order of magnitude larger than any other fleet, indicating it could play a decisive role in modulating potential negative vessel-whale interactions within NCP.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universidad Austral de Chile, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Valdivia, Chile (GRID:grid.7119.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0487 459X); NGO Centro Ballena Azul, Valdivia, Chile (GRID:grid.7119.e)
2 Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center/NOAA, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.7119.e)
3 Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center/NOAA, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.7119.e); Marine Ecology and Telemetry Research, Seabeck, USA (GRID:grid.508396.1); Cascadia Research Collective, Olympia, USA (GRID:grid.448402.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 5929 5632); Instituto Aqualie, Juiz de Fora, Brazil (GRID:grid.448402.e)
4 Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Grupo de Ecología Cuantitativa, INIBIOMA-CONICET, Bariloche, Argentina (GRID:grid.412234.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 473X)
5 Oregon State University, Marine Mammal Institute and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, USA (GRID:grid.4391.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 1969)