It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Fusion of nascent myoblasts to pre-existing myofibres is critical for skeletal muscle growth and repair. The vast majority of molecules known to regulate myoblast fusion are necessary in this process. Here, we uncover, through high-throughput in vitro assays and in vivo studies in the chicken embryo, that TGFβ (SMAD2/3-dependent) signalling acts specifically and uniquely as a molecular brake on muscle fusion. While constitutive activation of the pathway arrests fusion, its inhibition leads to a striking over-fusion phenotype. This dynamic control of TGFβ signalling in the embryonic muscle relies on a receptor complementation mechanism, prompted by the merging of myoblasts with myofibres, each carrying one component of the heterodimer receptor complex. The competence of myofibres to fuse is likely restored through endocytic degradation of activated receptors. Altogether, this study shows that muscle fusion relies on TGFβ signalling to regulate its pace.
Fusion of myoblasts is essential for muscle development and repair, but the molecular mechanism underlying this process remains unclear. Here, the authors show, using chicken embryos as a model, that TGFβ signalling inhibits fusion via a receptor complementation mechanism, and indicate the involvement of endocytic degradation of activated receptors in modulation of this process.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University Claude Bernard Lyon1, CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Institut NeuroMyoGène (INMG), Lyon, France (GRID:grid.462834.f)
2 University Claude Bernard Lyon1, CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Institut NeuroMyoGène (INMG), Lyon, France (GRID:grid.462834.f); Monash University, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857); Plexus Ventures LLC, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.1002.3)
3 Monash University, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857); Marseille Medical Genetics (MMG), Aix Marseille University, INSERM U1251, Marseille, France (GRID:grid.5399.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2176 4817)
4 Massachusetts General Hospital, Gastrointestinal Unit, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.32224.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 0386 9924)
5 Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
6 University Claude Bernard Lyon1, CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, Institut NeuroMyoGène (INMG), Lyon, France (GRID:grid.462834.f); Monash University, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (ARMI), Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)