It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Estrogen receptor (ER) testing of breast cancer imperfectly predicts response to endocrine therapy (ET). We hypothesize that a brief estradiol challenge will increase tumor progesterone receptor (PgR) levels only in tumors with functional ER. In this prospective, phase 2, single-center, single-arm trial (NCT02455453), we report the association of response to ET with change in tumor uptake of the progestin analog, 21-[18F]fluorofuranylnorprogesterone (FFNP), before and after a one-day estradiol challenge. In 43 postmenopausal women with advanced ER+ breast cancer, we show a post-challenge increase in tumor FFNP uptake only in 28 subjects with clinical benefit from ET (responders), but not in 15 without clinical benefit (nonresponders) (p < 0.0001), indicating 100% sensitivity and specificity. We further show significantly longer survival (p < 0.0001) in the responding subjects. Our results demonstrate that change in tumor FFNP uptake after estradiol challenge is highly predictive of response to ET in women with ER+ breast cancer.
Clinical estrogen receptor (ER) testing for breast cancer is limited in predicting response to endocrine therapy (ET). In this phase 2 clinical trial, authors demonstrate that the responsiveness to ET can be predicted by use of PET/CT with 21-[18F]fluorofuranylnorprogesterone (FFNP) to detect the change in tumor progesterone receptor (PgR) levels after a one-day estradiol challenge.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Washington University School of Medicine, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002); Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
2 Washington University School of Medicine, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002); Department of Surgery Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
3 Washington University School of Medicine, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002); Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2355 7002)
4 Saint Francis Healthcare, Cape Medical Oncology, Cape Girardeau, USA (GRID:grid.4367.6)
5 University of Illinois, Department of Chemistry and Cancer Center, Urbana, USA (GRID:grid.35403.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9991)