It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite high mortality and morbidity, COPD remains under-diagnosed. Case-finding strategies are possible, but patients’ perspectives are unexplored. Using qualitative methods, we explored the patient perspective of a case-finding intervention among at-risk patients in primary care. Semi-structured telephone interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis utilised. Seven patients without (mean age 64.5 years (58–74), n = 4) and 8 with obstructed spirometry (mean age 63.5 (53–75), n = 4) were interviewed. Themes identified were motives, challenges and concerns regarding attending the clinic. These included wanting to be well; to help with research; concern over negative impact to life from COPD diagnosis; perceived utility of the clinic; quality of information given; staff manner, approachability and knowledge; and perceived effects of the clinic on lifestyle, self-management and symptoms. The intervention was generally deemed useful and reassuring, although shared information was too detailed or irrelevant for some. Several reported positive lifestyle changes, improved symptoms and improved self-management.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK (GRID:grid.269014.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 0435 9078)
2 University of Southampton, NIHR ARC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297); University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.430506.4)
3 University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
4 University of Southampton, NIHR ARC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
5 University of Southampton, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
6 University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297); University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.430506.4); Southampton General Hospital, Wessex Investigational Sciences Hub, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.123047.3) (ISNI:0000000103590315)