It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In a dynamic world, it is essential to decide when to leave an exploited resource. Such patch-leaving decisions involve balancing the cost of moving against the gain expected from the alternative patch. This contrasts with value-guided decisions that typically involve maximizing reward by selecting the current best option. Patterns of neuronal activity pertaining to patch-leaving decisions have been reported in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), whereas competition via mutual inhibition in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is thought to underlie value-guided choice. Here, we show that the balance between cortical excitation and inhibition (E/I balance), measured by the ratio of GABA and glutamate concentrations, plays a dissociable role for the two kinds of decisions. Patch-leaving decision behaviour relates to E/I balance in dACC. In contrast, value-guided decision-making relates to E/I balance in vmPFC. These results support mechanistic accounts of value-guided choice and provide evidence for a role of dACC E/I balance in patch-leaving decisions.
Here, the authors show that the balance between excitation and inhibition in two cortical areas is differentially related to maximizing immediate rewards, and to weighting the cost against long-term gains of moving to a new environment.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Heinrich Heine University, Biological Psychology of Decision Making, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Düsseldorf, Germany (GRID:grid.411327.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2176 9917); Otto von Guericke University, Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307)
2 Otto von Guericke University, Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307); Military Hospital Berlin, Center for Military Mental Health, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a)
3 Otto von Guericke University, Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307); Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.418723.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2109 6265); German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.424247.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0438 0426); Otto von Guericke University, Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Institute for Physics, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307)