It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Cognitive fMRI research primarily relies on task-averaged responses over many subjects to describe general principles of brain function. Nonetheless, there exists a large variability between subjects that is also reflected in spontaneous brain activity as measured by resting state fMRI (rsfMRI). Leveraging this fact, several recent studies have therefore aimed at predicting task activation from rsfMRI using various machine learning methods within a growing literature on ‘connectome fingerprinting’. In reviewing these results, we found lack of an evaluation against robust baselines that reliably supports a novelty of predictions for this task. On closer examination to reported methods, we found most underperform against trivial baseline model performances based on massive group averaging when whole-cortex prediction is considered. Here we present a modification to published methods that remedies this problem to large extent. Our proposed modification is based on a single-vertex approach that replaces commonly used brain parcellations. We further provide a summary of this model evaluation by characterizing empirical properties of where prediction for this task appears possible, explaining why some predictions largely fail for certain targets. Finally, with these empirical observations we investigate whether individual prediction scores explain individual behavioral differences in a task.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Autonomous Learning Group, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.419534.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6533); Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Magnetic Resonance Center, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.419501.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 0052)
2 University Hospital Tübingen, Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.411544.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0196 8249); Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Magnetic Resonance Center, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.419501.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 0052)
3 Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Autonomous Learning Group, Tübingen, Germany (GRID:grid.419534.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6533)