It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Patch clamp recording of neurons is a labor-intensive and time-consuming procedure. Here, we demonstrate a tool that fully automatically performs electrophysiological recordings in label-free tissue slices. The automation covers the detection of cells in label-free images, calibration of the micropipette movement, approach to the cell with the pipette, formation of the whole-cell configuration, and recording. The cell detection is based on deep learning. The model is trained on a new image database of neurons in unlabeled brain tissue slices. The pipette tip detection and approaching phase use image analysis techniques for precise movements. High-quality measurements are performed on hundreds of human and rodent neurons. We also demonstrate that further molecular and anatomical analysis can be performed on the recorded cells. The software has a diary module that automatically logs patch clamp events. Our tool can multiply the number of daily measurements to help brain research.
Patch clamp recording of neurons is slow and labor-intensive. Here the authors present a method for automated deep learning driven label-free image guided patch clamp physiology to perform measurements on hundreds of human and rodent neurons.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.418331.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2195 9606)
2 University of Szeged, MTA-SZTE Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625)
3 University of Szeged, Department of Neurosurgery, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625)
4 University of Szeged, MTA-SZTE Research Group for Cortical Microcircuits of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Neuroscience, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625); Institute of Genetics, Biological Research Centre, Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.481815.1); Avidin Ltd, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.481815.1)
5 Institute of Genetics, Biological Research Centre, Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.481815.1); Avidin Ltd, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.481815.1)
6 Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.418331.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2195 9606); University of Helsinki, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071)