Abstract

A significant number of Baka Pygmies in Cameroon have been sedentarised in roadside villages, in contrast to their nomadic hunter-gatherer existence of the past. Although this change in lifestyle has had important consequences on health, most Baka villages still supplement their diets from forest products, especially wild meat. We used a combination of participatory methods and monitoring of individual hunters to map hunting territories in 10 Baka villages in southeastern Cameroon. From these, we determined whether wild meat extraction levels per village were related to the size of hunting territories, measured habitat use by hunters and finally defined the overlap between hunting territories and extractive industries in the region. Mapped village hunting areas averaged 205.2 ± 108.7 km2 (range 76.8–352.0 km2); all villages used a total of 2052 km2. From 295 tracks of 51 hunters, we showed that hunters travelled an average of 16.5 ± 13.5 km (range 0.9–89.8 km) from each village. Home ranges, derived from kernel utilization distributions, were correlated with village offtake levels, but hunter offtake and distance travelled were not significantly related, suggesting that enough prey was available even close to the villages. Hunters in all village areas exhibited a clear bias towards certain habitats, as indicated by positive Ivlev’s index of selectivity values. We also showed that all village hunting territories and hunter home ranges fall within mining and logging concessions. Our results are important for local understanding of forest land uses and to reconcile these with the other land uses in the region to better inform decisions concerning land use policy and planning.

Details

Title
Hunting territories and land use overlap in sedentarised Baka Pygmy communities in southeastern Cameroon
Author
Fa, Julia E 1 ; Ros Brull Guillermo 2 ; Ávila, Martin Eva 2 ; Okale, Robert 2 ; Fouda François 2 ; Fárfan, Miguel Ángel 3 ; Cain, Bradley 4 ; Fisher, Rohan 5 ; Coad, Lauren 6 ; Funk, Stephan M 7 

 Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Natural Sciences, School of Science and the Environment, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.25627.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 5329); CIFOR Headquarters, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia (GRID:grid.450561.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 442X) 
 Zerca Y Lejos ONGD, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.450561.3) 
 Universidad de Málaga, Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias, Málaga, Spain (GRID:grid.10215.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2298 7828); Instituto IBYDA, Centro de Experimentación Grice-Hutchinson, Málaga, Spain (GRID:grid.10215.37) 
 Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Natural Sciences, School of Science and the Environment, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.25627.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 5329) 
 Charles Darwin University, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Casuarina, Australia (GRID:grid.1043.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 559X) 
 CIFOR Headquarters, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia (GRID:grid.450561.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 442X); University of Oxford Zoology Research and Administration Building, Department of Zoology, Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948) 
 Nature Heritage, Channel Islands, Jersey (GRID:grid.4991.5) 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2488038691
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.