This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
In recent years, increasing research attention has been paid to novel, effective antidiabetes agents derived from natural sources [1]. Alismatis rhizoma (AR) is the tuber of Alisma orientale (Sam.) Juz. (Alismataceae), which is an aquatic plant that has been cultivated mainly in oriental countries (e.g., China, Japan, and Korea) but is also widely distributed in other areas (e.g., North America and Europe). AR has various activities, such as diuretic, hyperlipidemic, inflammatory, antitumoral, and damp-heat clearing activities [2–8]. AR is traditional folk medicine that has long been used to promote health and longevity (Sheng Nong’s herbal classic) for more than several thousand years. AR is currently included in the Pharmacopoeia of China not only as a diuretic but also as a representative hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic traditional Chinese herbal medicine. AR is an important component of many famous Chinese formulas for hypoglycemic from Febrile and Miscellaneous Disease (Shang Han Lun in Chinese) or Synopsis of Golden Chamber, including Zexie docotion, Ba wei shen qi wan, and Liu wei di huang wan [5, 9, 10], for usage as hypoglycemic because of their low toxicity, high effectiveness, and minimal side effects. Our previous studies reported the hypoglycemic activity of the ethanol extract of AR [11, 12]. Fourteen terpenoids were isolated from the ethanol extract of AR triterpenes (ART), which could promote glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 cells [13]. Meanwhile, the potential effect of ART on glucose metabolism, especially insulin resistance (IR), has not been investigated.
Type 2 diabetes (T2MD) comprises 90% of the total number of diabetes cases around the world. IR is an early metabolic abnormality in the progression of T2DM [14]. IR, which is characterized by low efficacy of insulin-induced glucose uptake [15], is caused by the dysregulated insulin-related signaling and glucose metabolism defects, such as impaired glucose transportation, phosphorylation, oxidation, and glycogen synthesis [16–18]. Apart from such well-recognized factors, low-grade inflammation is also an important contributing factor to IR [19]. Proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
Skeletal muscles are the main target organs for insulin-mediated glucose uptake, metabolism, and utilization and is also the earliest and most important site of IR [22, 23]. In skeletal muscle, insulin biding with insulin receptor (IRS-1) usually leads to four-stage glucose transporter 4 (GLUT 4) translocation in a complex process through IRS-1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT-GLUT4 pathway [24, 25]; this pathway is responsible for insulin-induced glucose uptake. However, glucose homeostasis is broken in IR cases [14, 26]. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a key regulator of energy homeostasis and ameliorates inflammation through inhibition of nuclear factor-
Thus, this study primarily aimed to evaluate the effect of ART and in the treatment of IR mice through body weight, glucose tolerance, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), Free Fatty Acid (FFA), inflammatory factors (e.g., TNF-
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. ART Preparation
According to our previous study [35], the extraction and purification method of Alismatis Rhizoma Triterpenes was as follows. Dried rhizomes of Alismatis Rhizoma were ground into powder (24 mesh) and then twice extracted by a decoction with 80% ethanol for 1 h. The filtrate was concentrated and subjected to chromatography on an HP20 macroreticular resin (Beijing Greenherbs Science and Technology Co., Beijing, China) column by using deionized water, 40% ethanol, and 75% ethanol as eluent. After collecting and concentrating the 75% ethanol fraction, the ART yield was determined to be 0.72%. An ACQUITY UHPLC I-Class system coupled with a Xevo XS quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used, and the LC conditions were based on a previous LC-Q-TOF-MS method [12, 36]. Chromatographic separation was carried out at 40°C on a Waters CORTECS C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm; 1.6 μm), with 0.1% of formic acid in water as mobile phase A and acetonitrile B as mobile phase B. Gradient elution was performed as follows: 45%–45% B for 0–0.5 min, 46%–65% B for 0.5–2 min, 65%–90% B for 2–7 min, and 90%–100% B at 7–10 min. The flow rate was 0.25 mL/min. The mass-spectrometry conditions were optimized as follows: dissolvent gas temperature, 500°C; capillary voltage, 3.5 kV; source temperature, 150°C; dissolvent gas flow, 800 L/h; and cone gas flow, 50 L/h. The MS scan range was m/z 50–1000, and the collision energy was set at 20 eV. For quantitation of ART, standard and sample solutions were prepared as follows: a series of working standard solutions of fourteen analytes [(1) 16-oxo-alisol A, (2) 16-oxo-alisol A 23-acetate, (3) 16-oxo-alisol A 24-acetate, (4) alisol C, (5) alisol C 23-acetate, (6) alisol L, (7) alisol A, (8) alisol A 23-acetate, (9) alisol A 24-acetate, (10) alisol L 23-acetate, (11) alisol B, (12) alisol B 23-acetate, (13) 11-deoxy-alisol B, (14) 11-deoxy-alisol B 23-acetate] were freshly prepared by diluting the mixed standard solutions with acetonitrile at the ratios of 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 ng/mL (Table S1). The ART samples: 20 mg powders were dissolved with 50 mL acetonitrile, then centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was diluted 100 times with acetonitrile to obtain a sample solution. Sample and working standard solutions were injected into LC-MS to acquire peak area responses (the detailed quantitative ion channel was shown in Table S2). Chromatogram of the sample (a) and standard solutions (b) were shown in Figure 2. According to the working standard concentration linearity curve (Table S1), fourteen triterpenes in ART were detected. ART containing fourteen triterpenes amounted to 885.9 mg/g (Table 1).
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
Table 1
Characterization of 14 triterpenes in ART by UPLC–Q-TOF–MS.
| No. | Molecular ion | Error | Fragment ions in positive mode | Molecular | Identity | Contents | |
| (min) | MS1 | (ppm) | MS2 | formula | (mg/g) | ||
| 1 | 2.29 | 505.3536 [M + H]+ | 1.38 | 487 [M + H − H2O]+, 469 [M + H − 2H2O]+, 415 [M + H − C4H10O2]+, 397 [M + H − C4H10O2 − H2O]+ | C30H48O6 | 16-oxo-alisol A | 14.2 |
| 2 | 2.41 | 547.3640 [M + H]+ | 0.91 | 529 [M + H − H2O]+, 511 [M + H − 2H2O]+, | C32H50O7 | 16-oxo-alisol A 23-acetate | 7.3 |
| 3 | 2.59 | 547.3642 [M + H]+ | 1.27 | 529 [M + H − H2O]+, 511 [M + H − 2H2O]+, | C32H50O7 | 16-oxo-alisol A 24-acetate | 7.5 |
| 4 | 2.78 | 487.3426 [M + H]+ | 0.41 | 469 [M + H − H2O]+, 451 [M + H − 2H2O]+, | C30H46O5 | Alisol C | 35.2 |
| 5 | 3.65 | 529.3534 [M + H]+ | 0.94 | 511 [M + H–H2O]+, 469 [M + H − HAc]+, 451 [M + H − HAc − H2O]+, 415 [M + H − C6H10O2]+, 397 [M + H − C6H10O2 − H2O]+ | C32H48O6 | Alisol C 23-acetate | 188.4 |
| 6 | 3.96 | 469.3324 [M + H]+ | 1.27 | 451 [M + H − H2O]+, 397 [M + H − C4H8O]+ | C30H44O4 | Alisol L | 32.6 |
| 7 | 4.24 | 491.3745 [M + H]+ | 1.62 | 473 [M + H − H2O]+, 455 [M + H − 2H2O]+, 437 [M + H − 3H2O]+, 383 [M + H − H2O − C4H10O2]+ | C30H50O5 | Alisol A | 28.6 |
| 8 | 4.41 | 533.3849 [M + H]+ | 1.31 | 515 [M + H − H2O]+, 497 [M + H − 2H2O]+, | C32H52O6 | Alisol A 23-acetate | 9.4 |
| 9 | 5.01 | 533.3850 [M + H]+ | 1.49 | 515 [M + H − H2O]+, 497 [M + H − 2H2O]+, | C32H52O6 | Alisol A 24-acetate | 11.2 |
| 10 | 5.23 | 511.3428 [M + H]+ | 0.78 | 451 [M + H − HAc]+, 397 [M + H − C6H10O2]+ | C32H46O5 | Alisol L 23-acetate | 10.1 |
| 11 | 5.99 | 473.3638 [M + H]+ | 1.47 | 455 [M + H − H2O]+, 437 [M + H − 2H2O]+, 383 [M + H–H2O − C4H8O]+ | C30H48O4 | Alisol B | 132.7 |
| 12 | 7.08 | 515.3745 [M + H]+ | 1.55 | 497 [M + H − H2O]+, 479 [M + H − 2H2O]+, 437 [M + H − H2O − HAc]+, 383 [M + H − H2O − C6H10O2]+ | C32H50O5 | Alisol B 23-acetate | 322.6 |
| 13 | 7.94 | 457.3684 [M + H]+ | 0.44 | 439 [M + H − H2O]+, 385 [M + H − C4H8O]+, 367 [M + H − C4H8O − H2O]+ | C30H48O3 | 11-deoxy alisol B | 65.7 |
| 14 | 8.97 | 499.3795 [M + H]+ | 1.60 | 439 [M + H − HAc]+, 385 [M + H − C6H10O2]+ | C32H50O4 | 11-deoxy alisol B 23-acetate | 20.4 |
The ingredients of ARTC were obtained according to our previous research [37]. Then, ARTC was prepared as follows: fourteen pure triterpenes were accurately weighed and mixed: 16-oxo-alisol A (1.42 mg), 16-oxo-alisol A 23-acetate (0.73 mg), 16-oxo-alisol A 24-acetate (0.75 mg), alisol C (3.52 mg), alisol C 23-acetate (18.84 mg), alisol L (3.26 mg), alisol A (2.86 mg), alisol A 23-acetate (0.94 mg), alisol A 24-acetate (1.12 mg), alisol L 23-acetate (1.01 mg), alisol B (13.27 mg), alisol B 23-acetate (32.26 mg), 11-deoxy alisol B (6.57 mg), and 11-deoxy alisol B 23-acetate (2.04 mg). The contents of these compounds in ART extract and ARTC were equal. In in vitro experiment, the mother liquid of ARTC (100 mg/mL in DMSO) was then diluted with a DMEM medium to the required drug concentrations and filtered with a 0.22 μm Millipore filtration system (Lot. No. R9BA69583) to eliminate bacteria.
2.2. Animal
Ethical approval for the present study was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Fujian Medical University, China. Male C57BL/6J mice (6 weeks old and weighing 16–18 g) were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Company. The production license number was SCXK (Shanghai) 2017-0005. Mice were fed in the Fujian Medical University SPF Animal Center, and the breeding facilities used permission license number SYXK (Fujian) 2016-0006. The temperature was 22–24°C, the relative humidity was 50%–70%, and the light/dark cycle was 12/12 h. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Fujian Medical University (Fujian, China).
2.3. Construction of IR-Mouse Model
The male C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into Chow (n = 10) and model (n = 30) groups. The Chow group was given a chow-fat diet, and the model group was given HFD. The Chow-fat diet (CHOW, D12450B, 10% calories from fat) and HFD (D12492, 60% calories from fat) were purchased from Guangdong Animal Center (Guangzhou, China). After 10 weeks, the mice were fasted for 12 h and then fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FINS), and IPITT were measured. Homeostasis model assessment of IR index (HOMA-IR) was also calculated to determine whether the IR model was established successfully (Figure S1).
The HOMA-IR formula was as follows:
2.4. Mouse Grouping and Administration
After establishing the IR-mouse model, the model group was randomly divided into three groups, namely, a positive control group (HFD + POS), an HFD group, and an HFD + ART group. Each group had 10 mice whose weights were recorded. The CHOW group was given a standard diet, the HFD + POS group was given HFD added with 200 mg/kg/d metformin, and the HFD + ART group was given HFD added with 200 mg/kg/d ART. All drugs were mixed as feed supplements through the equivalent incremental method and fed for 4 weeks. Positive drug metformin was bought from Farmhispania (Farmhispania S.A. Barcelona, Spain).
2.5. Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Tests (IPGTT) and Intraperitoneal Insulin Tolerance Test (IPITT)
For IPGTT tests, five mice per group were randomly selected, fasted for 12 h, and intraperitoneally injected with 2 g/kg glucose solution. For IPITT tests, five mice per group were randomly selected, fasted for 6 h, and intraperitoneally injected with 0.5 U/kg insulin solution. A glucometer was used to measure FBG and BG 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after intraperitoneal injection of each mice. The AUC in blood sugar was calculated as follows:
2.6. Western Blot Assay
Total protein was extracted with RIPA lysis buffer added with protease inhibitor (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) on ice, and the concentration of protein samples was determined by the BCA method. Cell-membrane proteins were extracted using a Mem-PERa Plus Membrane Protein Extraction Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were separated with 10% SDS/PAGE gel and then transferred onto NC membrane (Merck Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The protein band was blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies included the following: AMPK, p-AMPK, GLUT-4, AKT, P-IRS-1 (ser307), IRS-1 (ser307), P-AKT, and antiactin mouse (purchased from Santa Cruz, USA); and JNK, P-JNK, and PI3K (purchased from Abcam, USA). The information of all antibodies is shown in Table S3. After washing with TBST buffer, bands were incubated with secondary antibodies. HRP AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse lgG (H + L) and HRP AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit lgG (H + L) were purchased from Emarbio Science & Technology (Beijing, China). Proteins were detected and visualized using an ECL chemiluminescence kit (Jiancheng-BIO, Nanjing China). Actin served as an internal reference. The expressed proteins were quantified by densitometry analysis by using IMAGEJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
2.7. Cell Culture and Treatment
C2C12 cells were cultured in DMEM media (with 10% FBS and 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. When cell density reached 70%–80%, the culture media was changed into high-glucose DMEM with 2% horse serum (HS) to induce cellular differentiation. To establish the C2C12 cell IR model, C2C12 cells were treated with 0.5 mM PA for 16 h. To evaluate the therapeutic potential of ART in the IR cell model, C2C12 cells were placed onto six-well plates (0.25 × 106/well), and cellular differentiation was induced with 2% HS. Hunger treatment with low-glucose DMEM (1% BSA) was conducted for 12 h, and then grouping and administration were conducted as follows:
Control group (Con): 2% HS DMEM + 0 mM PA;
Model group (PA): 2% HS DMEM + 0.5 mM PA;
PA + ARTC25: 2% HS DMEM + 0.5 mM PA + 25 μg/mL ARTC;
PA + ARTC50: 2% HS DMEM + 0.5 mM PA + 50 μg/mL ARTC;
PA + ARTC100: 2% HS DMEM + 0.5 mM PA + 100 μg/mL ARTC.
After intervention for 16 h, the culture media (with/without 100 nM insulin) was changed and incubated for 30 min.
2.8. MTT Assay
Differential C2C12 cells were seeded onto 96-well plates with low-glucose DMEM culture medium (1% BSA). After 0.5 mM PA treatment for 16 h, the medium was changed with 2% HS and incubated with high-glucose DMEM (added with different final concentrations of ARTC, namely, 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 μg/mL). After culturing for 24 h, the culture media was absorbed and washed with PBS twice. About 100 μL of 0.5 mg/mL MTT solution was added, and the cells were cultured in a 37°C incubator for 4 h in darkness. Then, the MTT reagent in each well was removed and DMSO (100 μL/well) was added. The mixture was vortexed and OD570 nm was measured. To examine the influence of PA on C2C12 cell viability, we used the same method as above with the PA final concentrations set as 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 1 mM.
Cell viability was calculated as follows:
2.9. Glucose-Uptake Assay
The glucose-uptake rate was detected by the fluorescent
2.10. Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. All data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, and Student’s t-test was subsequently conducted for multiple comparisons.
3. Results
3.1. Determination of Triterpenes in ART
UPLC–Q-TOF–MS analysis showed that 16-oxo-alisol A, 16-oxo-alisol A 23-acetate, 16-oxo-alisol A 24-acetate, alisol C, alisol C 23-acetate, alisol L, alisol A, alisol A 23-acetate, alisol A 24-acetate, alisol L 23-acetate, alisol B, alisol B 23-acetate, 11-deoxy-alisol B, and 11-deoxy-alisol B 23-acetate were the major triterpenes in ART. The number of total triterpenoids containing 14 triterpenes in ART was 885.9 mg/g (Table 1).
3.2. ART Treatment Improves IR by Regulating Body Weight, Glucose Tolerance, HbA1C, FFA, and Inflammatory Factors in IR Mice
A high-fat diet-induced IR model (HFD) was established following our previous studies [11, 38] to explore the ART therapeutic potential in IR mice. We used ART treatment to intervene with these mice and observe the response. At the time point of 10 weeks, the IR model was established (Figure S1). After ART (200 mg/kg) treatment for 4 weeks (11–14 weeks), the body weight of IR mice (HFD + ART group) was significantly decreased compared with that of HFD group mice (Figure 3(a)). Efficacy monitoring indicators were considered. Specifically, the level of FBG, FINS, HbA1c, FFA with a close relationship with IR occurrence and promotes the development of IR-type diabetes [39]) in serum was determined, and the HOMA-IR in each group was conducted. After ART treatment, FBG, FIINS, HbA1C, FFA concentration, and HOMA-IR were decreased compared with those of HFD group mice (Figures 3(b)–3(f)). IPGTT and IPIGG were performed after 4 weeks of ART treatment to investigate the ART effect on glucose. As shown in Figure 3(g), the HFD + ART group exhibited a significantly low level of blood glucose concentrations at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min in IPGTT assay compared with HFD group mice. The area under the curve (AUC) of blood glucose concentrations was also significantly decreased in the HFD + ART group than in the HFD group (
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
3.3. ART Treatment Regulates IR-Associated Protein Expression
We analyzed IR-associated protein expression in the skeletal muscle of mice using Western blot analysis to evaluate the evidence base of ART treatment of IR. As shown in Figure 4, HFD group mice showed significantly downregulated AMPK (phosphorylated, Figure 4(a)), AKT (phosphorylated, Figure 4(b)), PI3K (Figure 4(c)), and GLUT4 (Figure 4(d)) compared with CHOW group. Moreover, HFD group mice showed significantly upregulated relative protein expression of IRS-1 (phosphorylated, Figure 4(e)) and JNK (phosphorylated, Figure 4(f)) compared with CHOW. Interestingly, ART treatment could reverse all IR-associated gene dysregulations (Figure 4). The relative expression levels of p-AMPK, p-AKT, p-IRS-1, and p-JNK protein were quantified by gray analysis and normalized to corresponding nonphosphorylated proteins. The relative expression levels of PI3K protein were quantified by gray analysis and normalized to actin. The relative expression levels of GLUT4 protein were quantified by gray analysis and normalized to Na+ − K+-ATPase. All results were represented as the mean ± SEM. ART treatment could regulate IR-associated gene expression in the skeletal muscle of high-fat diet-induced IR mice via AMPK/JNK and IRS-1/PI3K/AKT/GLUT4 signaling pathway.
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
3.4. ARTC Ameliorates Glucose Consumption and IR-Associated Inflammation in Skeletal Muscle Cells
Cell viability in response to different PA concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 1 mM) and ARTC concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 μg/ml) was measured after treatment for 24 h (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)) to test the cytotoxicity of PA and ARTC. As a result, PA at 0.5 mM reduced cell viability to approximately 85% of control, and 25–100 μg/ml ARTC doses were chosen to further explore the improvement effect in IR cell. PA-induced IR C2C12 cell model was constructed [40]. After 16 hours of PA intervention on C2C12 cells, the glucose consumption of the cells decreased by 12.95% (
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
3.5. ARTC Treatment Could Regulate IR-Associated Protein Expression in PA-Induced IR C2C12 Cells
Additional comprehensive protein detection was performed to further confirm the ARTC regulation on IR-associated genes. In PA-induced IR cells, the protein expression levels of p-AMPK, p-JNK PI3K, p-AKT, and GLUT4 were suppressed. By contrast, the level of p-IRIS-1 increased significantly. As shown in Figure 6, the expression levels of p-AMPK (Figure 6(a)), p-JNK (Figure 6(b)) PI3K (Figure 6(c)), p-AKT (Figure 6(d)), p-IRIS-1 (Figure 6(e)), and GLUT4 (Figure 6(f)) could be reversed after ARTC intervention. Furthermore, the relationship was dose dependent. The relative expression levels of p-AMPK, p-AKT, p-IRS-1, and p-JNK protein were quantified by gray analysis and normalized to corresponding nonphosphorylated proteins. The relative expression levels of PI3K protein were quantified by gray analysis and normalized to actin. The relative expression levels of GLUT4 protein were quantified by gray analysis and normalized to Na+ − K+-ATPase. All results were represented as the mean ± SEM. These results indicated that ARTC treatment had a significant regulatory effect on the expression of IR-associated genes related to AMPK/JNK and IRS-1/PI3K/AKT/GLUT4 signaling pathway in C2C12 cells induced by PA.
[figures omitted; refer to PDF]
4. Discussion
IR is a complex metabolic syndrome that may occur with obesity, diabetes, or cardiovascular diseases and lead to many abnormalities [41]. In a mouse model, IR has manifested as hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, increased HOMA-IR, impaired glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance, dysglycemia, and inflammatory factor disorder [42–44]. At the cellular level, IR primarily manifests as glucose metabolism disorder caused by insulin stimulation to target cells or tissues, especially skeletal muscle tissue [45]. Glucose metabolism usually refers to the process of glucose absorption and utilization by organisms and includes mostly AMPK/JNK and IRS-1/PI3K/AKT/GLUT4-mediated insulin signaling pathway disorder.
Currently recognized IR-mouse models include transgenic, knockout, genetic inherited (spontaneous), and inducible IR [46]. Owing to their stability and convenience, male C57BL/6J mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks were adopted as the IR-mouse model [11, 38]. To determine the actual material foundation of the anti-IR effect of ART from AR, UPLC-Q-TOF-MS was used to identify and determine the major ingredients from ART. To evaluate the anti-IR effect in vitro, we used the ARTC (a mixture of 16-oxo-alisol A, 16-oxo-alisol A 23-acetate, 16-oxo-alisol A 24-acetate, alisol C, alisol C 23-acetate, alisol L, alisol A, alisol A 23-acetate, alisol A 24-acetate, alisol L 23-acetate, alisol B, alisol B 23-acetate, 11-deoxy-alisol B, and 11-deoxy-alisol B 23-acetate, whose contents were equal to that of the ART extract).
In order to prove triterpenes are medicinal ingredients that alleviate high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle of mice, both in vivo and in vitro experiments were conducted. In vivo, as for AR triterpenes extract (ART) preparation, the ethanol extraction process and macroporous adsorption resin purify process of AR was used. As a result, the ART containing 14 structures clearly triterpenes amounted to 885.9 mg/g (the purity of triterpenes in ART has reached 88.59%). In vitro, in order to further confirm that triterpenes are the medicinal ingredients, ART component compatibility (ARTC, the composition and quantity of triterpenes equivalent to the ART extract triterpenes) was used for palmitate-treated IR C2C12 cells to exclude other components (such as sesquiterpenoids). So, ARTC preparation: fourteen pure triterpenes were accurately weighed and mixed: 16-oxo-alisol A (1.42 mg), 16-oxo-alisol A 23-acetate (0.73 mg), 16-oxo-alisol A 24-acetate (0.75 mg), alisol C (3.52 mg), alisol C 23-acetate (18.84 mg), alisol L (3.26 mg), alisol A (2.86 mg), alisol A 23-acetate (0.94 mg), alisol A 24-acetate (1.12 mg), alisol L 23-acetate (1.01 mg), alisol B (13.27 mg), alisol B 23-acetate (32.26 mg), 11-deoxy alisol B (6.57 mg), and 11-deoxy alisol B 23-acetate (2.04 mg); it only contained these 14 triterpenes rather than other components.
So, we investigated the anti-IR therapeutic effect of ART in an IR-mouse model and a C2C12 cell model. First, the IR-mouse model fed with HFD for 10 weeks was successfully constructed. Through FBG level measurement, IPGTT assay, and HOMA-IR score calculation, we found that the HFD group showed significant IR characters, indicating that the IR-mouse model was established. Then, after ART therapy for 4 weeks, the body weight significantly decreased. Through IPGTT and IPIGG assays, we found that ART could improve IR. Meanwhile, HbA1c as a standard marker for glycemic excursion in diabetic patients was also identified as an IR-prediction marker [47]. Notably, IR is a disease with complex networks of glucose metabolism and fat metabolism. When the tissue is insulin sensitive, excessive FFA in circulation creates IR [48]. Afterwards, the increase in lipolysis produces and releases more FFA, which forms the inflammatory basis in IR disease [49]. Herein, HbA1c, FFA, TNF-α, and MCP-1 level in the ART treatment group all significantly decreased compared with the HFD group. Moreover, considering the critical role of skeletal muscle in insulin-stimulated systemic glucose metabolism, skeletal muscle glucose metabolism disorders could affect systemic glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity [50, 51]. Skeletal muscle is an important tissue for the body’s glucose uptake and utilization and plays a major role in maintaining the dynamic balance of blood glucose. Accordingly, we detected IR-associated gene expression in mouse skeletal muscle and found that ART treatment regulated the AMPK/JNK and IRS-1/PI3K/AKT/GLUT4 signaling pathway. AMPK also ameliorated inflammation and maintained energy homeostasis by inhibiting NF-
Although AR compounds have been found to improve genes related to glucose and lipid metabolism, the regulation of the insulin signaling pathway has not yet been systematically reported. To further facilitate evidence-based cellular exploration, the IR model of C2C12 cells induced by PA was accustomed. After the ARTC intervention, we found that ARTC treatment promoted PA-induced glucose consumption in a dose-dependent manner [39]. The intervention of ART reduced the expression of TNF-
5. Conclusions
The above results showed that ART attenuated the impairment of AMPK/JNK and IRS-1/PI3K/AKT/GLUT4-mediated insulin signaling in skeletal muscles of HFD-fed mice. ART treatment significantly ameliorated HFD-induced weight gain and improved glucose tolerance in mice. The expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines were markedly attenuated by ART in various in vivo models. ART treatment markedly augmented AMPK phosphorylation expression in the skeletal muscle of mice. Furthermore, the intervention of ARTC reduced the expression levels of TNF-
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773956, 81703692, 81872990, and U1205022), Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Fujian (2018J01870), and Foreign Cooperation Program of Department of Science and Technology of Fujian (2018I0009), and Young and Middle-Aged Backbone Program of Fujian Provincial Health Commission (2018-ZQN-65).
[1] J. He, H. Wang, J. Vijg, "New insights into bioactive compounds of traditional Chinese medicines for insulin resistance based on signaling pathways," Journal of Chemistry & Biodiversity, vol. 16 no. 9,DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.201900176, 2019.
[2] C. Wang, L. Feng, L. Ma, "Alisol a 24-acetate and alisol b 23-acetate induced autophagy mediates apoptosis and nephrotoxicity in human renal proximal tubular cells," Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 8 no. 172,DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00172, 2017.
[3] Y.-L. Feng, H. Chen, T. Tian, D.-Q. Chen, Y.-Y. Zhao, R.-C. Lin, "Diuretic and anti-diuretic activities of the ethanol and aqueous extracts of Alismatis Rhizoma," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 154 no. 2, pp. 386-390, DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.04.017, 2014.
[4] C. W. Han, M. J. Kwun, K. H. Kim, "Ethanol extract of Alismatis Rhizoma reduces acute lung inflammation by suppressing NF- κ B and activating Nrf2," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 146 no. 1, pp. 402-410, DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.01.010, 2013.
[5] L.-L. Zhang, W. Xu, Y.-L. Xu, X. Chen, M. Huang, J.-J. Lu, "Therapeutic potential of Rhizoma Alismatis : a review on ethnomedicinal application, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1401 no. 1, pp. 90-101, DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13381, 2017.
[6] H.-M. Li, M. Fan, Y. Xue, "Guaiane-type sesquiterpenoids from Alismatis Rhizoma and their anti-inflammatory activity," Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 65 no. 4, pp. 403-407, DOI: 10.1248/cpb.c16-00798, 2017.
[7] S. Li, S. Jin, C. Song, "The metabolic change of serum lysophosphatidylcholines involved in the lipid lowering effect of triterpenes from Alismatis rhizoma on high-fat diet induced hyperlipidemia mice," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 177, pp. 10-18, DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.11.017, 2016.
[8] Y. Yang, D.-M. Zhang, J.-H. Liu, "Wuling San protects kidney dysfunction by inhibiting renal TLR4/MyD88 signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in high fructose-induced hyperuricemic mice," Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 169, pp. 49-59, DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.04.011, 2015.
[9] C.-Y. Huang, Y.-T. Tsai, J.-N. Lai, F.-L. Hsu, "Prescription pattern of Chinese herbal products for diabetes mellitus in Taiwan: a population-based study," Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013,DOI: 10.1155/2013/201329, 2013.
[10] J. S. Jhang, H. Livneh, S. Y. Yang, "Decreased risk of colorectal cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes receiving Chinese herbal medicine: a population-based cohort study," BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care, vol. 8 no. 1,DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000732, 2020.
[11] W. Xu, F. R. Luo, W. L. Zhao, "Chemical constituents from Alisma orientalis extracts with hypoglycemic effect," Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, vol. 45 no. 22, pp. 3238-3245, DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2014.22.005, 2014.
[12] W. Zhao, X. Huang, X. Li, "Qualitative and quantitative analysis of major triterpenoids in Alismatis rhizoma by high performance liquid chromatography/diode-array detector/quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and ultra-performance liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry," Molecules, vol. 20 no. 8, pp. 13958-13981, DOI: 10.3390/molecules200813958, 2015.
[13] X. Y. Li, X. J. Li, C. K. Liu, "Effects of triterpenes isolated from rhizoma Alismatis on glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 cells," Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 24 no. 5, pp. 31-33, 2014.
[14] R. Carnagarin, A. M. Dharmarajan, C. R. Dass, "Molecular aspects of glucose homeostasis in skeletal muscle-a focus on the molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance," Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 417, pp. 52-62, DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.004, 2015.
[15] A. Mitrakou, D. Kelley, T. Veneman, "Contribution of abnormal muscle and liver glucose metabolism to postprandial hyperglycemia in NIDDM," Diabetes, vol. 39 no. 11, pp. 1381-1390, DOI: 10.2337/diab.39.11.1381, 1990.
[16] M. Bajaj, R. A. Defronzo, "Metabolic and molecular basis of insulin resistance," Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 10 no. 3, pp. 311-323, DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(03)00520-8, 2003.
[17] K. Cusi, K. Maezono, A. Osman, "Insulin resistance differentially affects the PI 3-kinase- and MAP kinase-mediated signaling in human muscle," Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105 no. 3, pp. 311-320, DOI: 10.1172/jci7535, 2000.
[18] H. K. Karlsson, J. R. Zierath, "Insulin signaling and glucose transport in insulin resistant human skeletal muscle," Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 48 no. 2-3, pp. 103-113, DOI: 10.1007/s12013-007-0030-9, 2007.
[19] A. M. F. Johnson, J. M. Olefsky, "The origins and drivers of insulin resistance," Cell, vol. 152 no. 4, pp. 673-684, DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.041, 2013.
[20] J. Hirosumi, G. Tuncman, L. Chang, "A central role for JNK in obesity and insulin resistance," Nature, vol. 420 no. 6913, pp. 333-336, DOI: 10.1038/nature01137, 2002.
[21] S. E. Shoelson, J. Lee, A. B. Goldfine, "Inflammation and insulin resistance," Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116 no. 8, pp. 1793-1801, DOI: 10.1172/jci29069, 2006.
[22] C. Wu, G. Xu, S.-Y. A. Tsai, W. J. Freed, C.-T. Lee, "Transcriptional profiles of type 2 diabetes in human skeletal muscle reveal insulin resistance, metabolic defects, apoptosis, and molecular signatures of immune activation in response to infections," Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 482 no. 2, pp. 282-288, DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.11.055, 2017.
[23] M. Björnholm, J. R. Zierath, "Insulin signal transduction in human skeletal muscle: identifying the defects in Type II diabetes," Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 33 no. 2, pp. 354-357, DOI: 10.1042/bst0330354, 2005.
[24] H. Zaid, C. N. Antonescu, V. K. Randhawa, A. Klip, "Insulin action on glucose transporters through molecular switches, tracks and tethers," Biochemical Journal, vol. 413 no. 2, pp. 201-215, DOI: 10.1042/bj20080723, 2008.
[25] Z. Li, Y. Zhu, C. Li, "Liraglutide ameliorates palmitate-induced insulin resistance through inhibiting the IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in mouse skeletal muscle cells," Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 41 no. 9, pp. 1097-1102, DOI: 10.1007/s40618-018-0836-x, 2018.
[26] R. A. DeFronzo, D. Tripathy, "Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes," Diabetes Care, vol. 32 no. 2, pp. 157-163, DOI: 10.2337/dc09-s302, 2009.
[27] A. Salminen, J. M. T. Hyttinen, K. Kaarniranta, "AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits NF- κ B signaling and inflammation: impact on healthspan and lifespan," Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 89 no. 7, pp. 667-676, DOI: 10.1007/s00109-011-0748-0, 2011.
[28] J. L. Evans, B. A. Maddux, I. D. Goldfine, "The molecular basis for oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance," Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 7 no. 7-8, pp. 1040-1052, DOI: 10.1089/ars.2005.7.1040, 2005.
[29] P. Gual, Y. Le Marchand-Brustel, J.-F. Tanti, "Positive and negative regulation of insulin signaling through IRS-1 phosphorylation," Biochimie, vol. 87 no. 1, pp. 99-109, DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2004.10.019, 2005.
[30] A. R. G. Look, R. R. Wing, P. Bolin, "Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 369 no. 2, pp. 45-54, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212914, 2013.
[31] S. E. Kahn, S. M. Haffner, M. A. Heise, "Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355 no. 23, pp. 2427-2443, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa066224, 2006.
[32] J. M. Drazen, S. Morrissey, G. D. Curfman, "Rosiglitazone-continued uncertainty about safety," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357 no. 1, pp. 63-64, DOI: 10.1056/nejme078118, 2007.
[33] B. M. Psaty, C. D. Furberg, "Rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risk," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356 no. 24, pp. 2522-2524, DOI: 10.1056/nejme078099, 2007.
[34] S. E. Nissen, K. Wolski, "Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356 no. 24, pp. 2457-2471, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa072761, 2007.
[35] M.-Q. Huang, W. Xu, S.-S. Wu, J.-J. Lu, X.-P. Chen, "A 90-day subchronic oral toxicity study of triterpene-enriched extract from Alismatis Rhizoma in rats," Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 58, pp. 318-323, DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.009, 2013.
[36] X. Zhang, X. Y. Li, N. Lin, "Diuretic activity of compatible triterpene components of Alismatis rhizoma," Molecules, vol. 22 no. 9,DOI: 10.3390/molecules22091459, 2017.
[37] W. Xu, T. Li, J.-F. Qiu, "Anti-proliferative activities of terpenoids isolated from Alisma orientalis and their structure-activity relationships," Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 15 no. 2, pp. 228-235, DOI: 10.2174/1871520614666140601213514, 2015.
[38] L. Ren, P. Zhan, Q. Wang, "Curcumin upregulates the Nrf2 system by repressing inflammatory signaling-mediated Keap1 expression in insulin-resistant conditions," Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 514 no. 3, pp. 691-698, DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.010, 2019.
[39] Q. Zhang, X. Kong, H. Yuan, "Mangiferin improved palmitate-induced-insulin resistance by promoting free fatty acid metabolism in HepG2 and C2C12 cells via PPARalpha: mangiferin improved insulin resistance," Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2019,DOI: 10.1155/2019/2052675, 2019.
[40] H. J. Kwak, H. E. Choi, H. G. Cheon, "5-LO inhibition ameliorates palmitic acid-induced ER stress, oxidative stress and insulin resistance via AMPK activation in murine myotubes," Journal of Scientific Reports, vol. 7 no. 1,DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05346-5, 2017.
[41] R. A. DeFronzo, R. C. Bonadonna, E. Ferrannini, "Pathogenesis of NIDDM: a balanced overview," Diabetes Care, vol. 15 no. 3, pp. 318-368, DOI: 10.2337/diacare.15.3.318, 1992.
[42] S. Guo, "Insulin signaling, resistance, and the metabolic syndrome: insights from mouse models into disease mechanisms," Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 220 no. 2,DOI: 10.1530/joe-13-0327, 2014.
[43] D. E. Moller, K. D. Kaufman, "Metabolic syndrome: a clinical and molecular perspective," Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 56 no. 1, pp. 45-62, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.56.082103.104751, 2005.
[44] Y. Qi, Z. Xu, Q. Zhu, "Myocardial loss of IRS1 and IRS2 causes heart failure and is controlled by p38 MAPK during insulin resistance," Diabetes, vol. 62 no. 11, pp. 3887-3900, DOI: 10.2337/db13-0095, 2013.
[45] S. Ridley, D. G. Gaylard, M. Lim, "Effect of vecuronium on atropine-induced changes in heart rate," Anaesthesia, vol. 44 no. 3, pp. 216-218, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb11226.x, 1989.
[46] Q. Meng, Y.-C. Lai, N. J. Kelly, "Development of a mouse model of metabolic syndrome, pulmonary hypertension, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction," American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 56 no. 4, pp. 497-505, DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0177oc, 2017.
[47] S. E. Park, C.-Y. Park, G. Sweeney, "Biomarkers of insulin sensitivity and insulin resistance: past, present and future," Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, vol. 52 no. 4, pp. 180-190, DOI: 10.3109/10408363.2015.1023429, 2015.
[48] B. Singh, A. Saxena, "Surrogate markers of insulin resistance: a review," World Journal of Diabetes, vol. 1 no. 2, pp. 36-47, DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v1.i2.36, 2010.
[49] J. M. Fernandez-Real, W. Ricart, "Insulin resistance and chronic cardiovascular inflammatory syndrome," Endocrine Reviews, vol. 24 no. 3, pp. 278-301, DOI: 10.1210/er.2002-0010, 2003.
[50] H. Wu, C. M. Ballantyne, "Skeletal muscle inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity," Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 127 no. 1, pp. 43-54, DOI: 10.1172/jci88880, 2017.
[51] S. Mukaida, B. A. Evans, T. Bengtsson, D. S. Hutchinson, M. Sato, "Adrenoceptors promote glucose uptake into adipocytes and muscle by an insulin-independent signaling pathway involving mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2," Pharmacological Research, vol. 116, pp. 87-92, DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.12.022, 2017.
[52] M. Abu-Farha, P. Cherian, I. Al-Khairi, "DNAJB3/HSP-40 cochaperone improves insulin signaling and enhances glucose uptake in vitro through JNK repression," Scientific Reports, vol. 5 no. 1,DOI: 10.1038/srep14448, 2015.
[53] J. Xu, S. Wang, T. Feng, Y. Chen, G. Yang, "Hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects of total saponins from Stauntonia chinensis in diabetic d b /d b mice," Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22 no. 12, pp. 6026-6038, DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13876, 2018.
[54] M.-K. Jang, Y.-R. Han, J. Nam, "Protective effects of alisma orientale extract against hepatic steatosis via inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress," International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16 no. 11, pp. 26151-26165, DOI: 10.3390/ijms161125944, 2015.
[55] Q. Li, H. Qu, "Study on the hypoglycemic activities and metabolism of alcohol extract of Alismatis Rhizoma," Fitoterapia, vol. 83 no. 6, pp. 1046-1053, DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.05.009, 2012.
[56] J. X. Chen, H. Y. Li, T. T. Li, "Alisol A-24-acetate promotes glucose uptake via activation of AMPK in C2C12 myotubes," BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, vol. 20 no. 1,DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2802-3, 2020.
[57] Q. Meng, X.-P. Duan, C.-Y. Wang, "Alisol B 23-acetate protects against non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in mice via farnesoid X receptor activation," Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 38 no. 1, pp. 69-79, DOI: 10.1038/aps.2016.119, 2017.
[58] X. Bi, P. Wang, Q. Ma, "Anti-inflammatory activities and liver protection of alisol F and 25-anhydroalisol F through the inhibition of MAPK, STAT3, and NF- κ B activation in vitro and in vivo," Molecules, vol. 22 no. 6,DOI: 10.3390/molecules22060951, 2017.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2021 Xiao-Kang Jia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Alismatis rhizoma (AR), which is the dried rhizome of Alisma orientale (Sam.) Juz. (Alismataceae), is an important component of many famous Chinese formulas for hypoglycemic. This study aimed to evaluate the insulin resistance (IR) alleviating effects of AR triterpenes (ART) and ART component compatibility (ARTC, the mixture of 16-oxo-alisol A, 16-oxo-alisol A 23-acetate, 16-oxo-alisol A 24-acetate, alisol C, alisol C 23-acetate, alisol L, alisol A, alisol A 23-acetate, alisol A 24-acetate, alisol L 23-acetate, alisol B, alisol B 23-acetate, 11-deoxy-alisol B and 11-deoxy-alisol B 23-acetate) in high-fat diet-induced IR mice and plamitate-treated IR C2C12 cells, respectively. A dose of 200 mg/kg of ART was orally administered to IR mice, and different doses (25, 50, and 100 μg/ml) of ARTC groups were treated to IR C2C12 cells. IPGTT, IPITT, body weight, Hb1AC, FFA, TNF-
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Jin-Fang, Huang 2 ; Xiao-Qiang, Huang 3 ; Xiao-Yan, Li 2 ; Ming-Qing Huang 4 ; Huai-Chang Zhu 2 ; Gao-Pan, Li 2 ; Meng-Liu, Lan 2 ; Zhi-Wen, Yu 4 ; Xu, Wen 4
; Shui-Sheng Wu 4
1 College of Pharmacy, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China; Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China; Centre of Biomedical Research & Development, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China
2 College of Pharmacy, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China
3 College of Pharmacy, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China; Medical School, Huanghe Science & Technology College, Zhengzhou 450063, China
4 College of Pharmacy, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China; Centre of Biomedical Research & Development, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China





