It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To date, two randomized, controlled studies support the use of candesartan for migraine prophylaxis but with limited external validity. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of candesartan in clinical practice and to explore predictors of patient response. Retrospective cohort study including all patients with migraine who received candesartan between April 2008-February 2019. The primary endpoint was the number of monthly headache days during weeks 8–12 of treatment compared to baseline. Additionally, we evaluated the frequency during weeks 20–24. We analysed the percentage of patients with 50% and 75% response rates and the retention rates after three and 6 months of treatment. 120/4121 patients were eligible, aged 45.9 [11.5]; 100 (83.3%) female. Eighty-four patients (70%) had chronic migraine and 53 (42.7%) had medication-overuse headache. The median number of prior prophylactics was 3 (Inter-quartile range 2–5). At baseline, patients had 20.5 ± 8.5 headache days per month, decreasing 4.3 ± 8.4 days by 3 months (weeks 12–16) and by 4.7 ± 8.7 days by 6 months (paired Student’s t-test, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with a 50% response was 32.5% at 3 months and 31.7% at 6 months, while the retention rate was 85.0% and 58.3%. The number of prior treatments (Odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.97) and the presence of daily headache (Odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.16–0.97) were associated with a lower probability of response. Candesartan showed beneficial effects in the preventive treatment of migraine in clinical practice, including patients with chronic migraine, medication-overuse headache and resistance to prior prophylactics.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Valladolid, Department of Medicine, Valladolid, Spain (GRID:grid.5239.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2286 5329)
2 Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Valladolid, Spain (GRID:grid.411057.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9274 367X)
3 Universidad de Valladolid, Imaging Processing Laboratory, Valladolid, Spain (GRID:grid.5239.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2286 5329)
4 University of Valladolid, Department of Medicine, Valladolid, Spain (GRID:grid.5239.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2286 5329); Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Valladolid, Spain (GRID:grid.411057.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9274 367X); Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL) of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (GRID:grid.452531.4)
5 Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Valladolid, Spain (GRID:grid.411057.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9274 367X); Institute for Biomedical Research (IBSAL) of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain (GRID:grid.452531.4)