It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Purpose
Pathological tibial torsion is known to negatively influence the functionality of the lower extremity, and therefore, its assessment might play an important role. While 3D imaging is used for many examinations of the musculoskeletal system, for the determination of tibial torsion no 3D measurement technique has been available so far. We developed a 3D measurement method and assess its interobserver reliability as well as its correlation with standard 2D measurement methods.
Methods
CT scans of 82 tibiae in 79 patients with a mean age of 41 years were included. A novel 3D measurement technique was developed and applied. Measurements were compared with two frequently used 2D measurement methods. ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient) for the new technique was determined and compared to the 2D measurement method. Furthermore, differences between left and right legs as well as between males and females were assessed.
Results
The ICC for the 2D methods was 0.917 and 0.938, respectively. For the 3D measurements, ICCs were calculated to be 0.954 and 0.950. Agreement between 2 and 3D methods was moderate to good with ICCs between 0.715 and 0.795. Torsion values for left and right legs did not differ significantly in 2D and in 3D (26.2 vs 28.5° and 27.2 vs. 25.9°). The same is true for the differences between male and female in 2D and 3D (26.2 vs. 29.6° and 25.0 vs. 31.2°).
Conclusion
The newly developed 3D measurement technique shows a high intraclass agreement and offers an applicable opportunity to assess the tibial torsion three-dimensionally.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Department of Orthopaedics, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650); Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Research in Orthopaedic Computer Science, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650)
2 Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Research in Orthopaedic Computer Science, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650)
3 Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, RadiologyZurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650)
4 Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Department of Orthopaedics, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.7400.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0650)