Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) and hemimegalencephaly (HME) can cause drug‐resistant epilepsy, with histopathological features of FCDII including cortical dyslamination and dysmorphic neurons (DNs) with (FCDIIB) or without (FCDIIA) balloon cells (BCs).1 Pathogenic somatic variants restricted to brain tissue in PI3K–AKT–mTOR pathway genes are implicated in a range of cortical malformations.2 We and others have hypothesized that the lesion size may correlate with the degree of mosaicism (the “variant load”) within dysplastic tissue.3–5
Recently, somatic variants in the gene encoding Ras homolog enriched in brain (RHEB) were reported in cortical malformations; a RHEB p.E40V substitution in one HME patient (21% variant load)6 and a p.Y35L substitution in one FCDIIA patient (6% variant load).7 In concordance with these findings, we previously reported genetic data in one FCDIIB patient with RHEB p.E40V substitution (8.9% variant load) and one HME patient with RHEB p.Y35L substitution (17.6% variant load).3
Here, we characterize a new patient with a transmantle FCD due to a brain‐specific somatic variant in RHEB with a low variant load. In combination with newly presented genetic and imaging data from our two previously described patients with somatic RHEB variants,3 we determined that variant load correlates with the variable severity observed across the spectrum of FCD. We investigated the enrichment of RHEB variants in abnormal cell types using laser capture microdissection (LCM) as an extension of our previous work in the related mTOR pathway genes DEPDC5, MTOR, and PIK3CA.3,4
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the Royal Children’s Hospital (ID 29077) and ethical committee CPP Ile de France II (N° ID‐RCB/EUDRACT‐2015‐A00671‐48). Patient 2 and Patient 3 were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (N° NCT02890641). Clinical details were obtained from medical records. Written informed consent was obtained from participants or their parents.
Brain tissues were collected at the time of surgery and stored as frozen and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue, taken from the left postcentral gyrus in Patient 1, from the opercular and insular region in Patient 2 (first surgery), and the left medial frontal lobe from Patient 3. Blood and FCD‐derived DNA were sequenced using deep targeted sequencing, and variants were validated by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), site‐specific amplicon sequencing, or Sanger sequencing as previously described.3,4 For immunostaining, FFPE tissues were processed and incubated with anti‐Phospho‐S6 Ribosomal Protein (Ser235/236) antibody (Cell‐Signalling, #2211, #4856), a routinely used antibody to assess mTOR activation. LCM was performed as previously described.3 Pools of 500 cells (DNs from Patient 2 and DNs and BCs from Patient 3) were isolated. There was insufficient tissue available from Patient 1 for LCM studies.
This 21‐year‐old female presented at age 7 years with sensorimotor seizures manifest by ascending right numbness then weakness. Seizures occurred in clusters of multiple daily events over a few weeks with seizure free periods of up to 12 months in between. Video EEG showed low amplitude left centroparietal slowing and sharp activity and seizures associated with low voltage left centroparietal periodic rhythms. Brain MRI showed a transmantle FCD involving left pre‐ and postcentral gyri (Fig. 1A). Leading up to surgery, seizures had been present for 6 months occurring on a multiple weekly to multiple daily frequency and accompanied by altered responsiveness. Partial resection was performed at age 16 years while awake with resection limited by right arm weakness, which did not persist. Brief right hand sensory seizures continued postoperatively and gradually reduced in frequency until ceasing 15 months postsurgery. During this time, triple anticonvulsant therapy with topiramate, lamotrigine, and clobazam was slowly weaned to low dose topiramate monotherapy. Her brief sensory seizures returned after a 14‐month period of seizure freedom and she has had ongoing incomplete seizure control since then despite trials of additional anticonvulsant medications, varying from a multiple daily to multiple weekly frequency.
1 Figure. Correlation between somatic variant load in RHEB and the extent of lesion. Coronal T2 MRI scans showing transmantle FCD in Patient 1 (A) lobar FCD in Patient 2 (B), and HME in Patient 3 (C). The boundaries of the malformations are illustrated by white lines. Somatic variants in RHEB were identified in all three patients, with positive correlation between the variant load and the size of the brain lesion. The corresponding genetic variant and somatic variant load are indicated for each patient.
This 6‐year‐old male presented at age 6 months with focal seizures manifest by right arm tonic posturing and head deviation to the left. Video EEG showed left fronto‐temporal epileptic discharges. Stereo EEG showed a left operculo‐insular and lateral temporal seizure onset zone. Brain MRI showed a left temporo‐opercular FCD (Fig. 1B). First surgery at age 2 consisted of resection of the opercular and insular region but did not control seizures (Engel outcome score 4). Due to ongoing seizures, a hemispherotomy was subsequently performed at age 4. The patient has been seizure free for 4 years without AED (Engel outcome score 1).
This 3‐year‐old male presented at age 3 days with multiple daily focal seizures manifest by right‐sided clonic jerking, eyelid blinking, and cyanosis. EEG revealed multiple left hemisphere foci and 3T MRI showed left HME (Fig. 1C). A syndromic diagnosis of epidermal naevus syndrome was made. Hemispherotomy was performed at age 5 months. This patient has been seizure free for 2.5 years without AED (Engel outcome score 1).
We identified a brain‐specific somatic RHEB variant (NM_005614.4:c.104_105delACinsTG; p.Y35L) in Patient 1. Brain‐specific somatic RHEB variants were previously identified in Patient 2 and Patient 33 (Table 1). Variants were not detected in the matched blood samples.
TableSomatic RHEB variants detected in the patients with cortical malformations.Patient ID | Histopathology | cDNA Change | Protein Change | Brain VAF (targeted sequencing) | Validation |
Patient 1 | FCDIIB | c.104_105delACinsTG | p.Y35L | 2.6% | Droplet Digital PCR (2.6%) |
Patient 21 | FCDIIB | c.119A > T | p.E40V | 8.9% | Site‐specific amplicon sequencing (8.9%) |
Patient 31 | FCDIIB (HME) | c.104_105delACinsTA | p.Y35L | 17.6% | Sanger sequencing |
Analysis of imaging showed that the extent of the malformation correlated with somatic variant load. In Patient 1 (2.6% variant load), the small FCD was restricted to a transmantle dysplasia affecting left pre‐ and postcentral gyri (Fig. 1A). In Patient 2 (8.9% variant load), a lobar FCD affected the entire left temporal lobe (Fig. 1B) and in Patient 3 (17.6% variant load), left HME was present (Fig. 1C).
We performed immunostaining against p‐S6 (canonical hallmark of mTOR kinase activity) and identified abundant DNs and BCs in brain specimens of all patients with strong immunoreactivity (Fig. 2A–C), indicating upregulated mTOR activity. In contrast, immunoreactivity against p‐S6 was not observed in non‐mTOR‐related FCDI and postmortem control specimens (Fig. 2D–E).
2 Figure. RHEB‐mutated DNs and BCs show p‐S6 immunoreactivity. Immunostaining of patient brain sections with an antibody directed against p‐S6 shows abnormal cells with strong immunoreactivity in Patient 2 (A), Patient 3 (B), and Patient 1 (C). In contrast, immunostaining of p‐S6 in an FCDI resection specimen (D) and a normal postmortem specimen (E) did not show strong immunoreactivity. In Patient 2, p‐S6‐positive cells are distributed in all cortical layers (A), a predominance of DNs is observed (A’), while scattered BCs are found at the gray–white matter borders (A’’). In Patient 3 cortical layering is completely lost (B), with high density of BCs all over the specimen, including layer 1 (B), and often organized in clusters (B’’), while DNs are more interspersed (B’). Black scale bar = 50 μm, blue scale bar = 500 μm. Sequencing of LCM‐isolated cells shows variant enrichment in DNs and BCs (F). There were insufficient BCs from Patient 2 for LCM. Arrowheads indicate the altered bases in Patient 2 (A > T) and Patient 3 (AC > TA). Variant allele frequencies quantified by site‐specific amplicon sequencing are shown. DN: Dysmorphic neuron; BC: Balloon cell.
Density of pS6‐positive cells in cortical layers could not be well appreciated in Patient 1 due to limited tissue. Density of pS6‐positive cells was lower in Patient 2 compared to Patient 3, consistent with the lower variant load. In Patient 2, pS6‐positive cells were distributed in all cortical layers (except layer 1), with a higher proportion and distribution of DNs compared to scattered BCs at the gray–white junction (Fig. 2A). In Patient 3, cortical layering was completely absent, with high density of BCs throughout the specimen, including layer 1, often organized in small clusters, while DNs were rarer (Fig. 2B).
To investigate which cell types harbor the somatic variants, we used LCM to isolate pools of DNs from Patient 2, and pools of DNs and BCs from Patient 3. There was insufficient material to perform LCM from Patient 1 and insufficient number of BCs from frozen tissue of Patient 2. Sanger and site‐specific amplicon sequencing of each pool revealed clear enrichment of the variants in DNs and BCs compared to bulk tissue, suggesting enrichment in these cell types (Fig. 2F).
Here, we report clinical, neuropathological and genetic data of three patients with brain mosaic RHEB variants leading to a spectrum of FCD, the extent of which correlates with the somatic variant load. RHEB is a member of the Ras superfamily GTPases that can activate mTOR signaling pathway.8 Immunostaining of dysplastic tissues showed that RHEB p.Y35L and p.E40V substitutions result in hyperactivation of mTOR. LCM findings show enrichment of somatic RHEB variants in DNs and BCs, as we previously reported in other mTOR pathway genes DEPDC5, MTOR, and PIK3CA,3,4 confirming that these variants account for the abnormal cell types. The presence of the variants, at similar allele frequencies in both DNs and BCs suggests that both cell types share a common developmental lineage.
Patient 1 and Patient 3 both carried the p.Y35L substitution, with lower variant load causing small FCD and higher variant load causing HME. This supports the hypothesis that the timing of the postzygotic somatic mutation is crucial in determining lesion size. In accordance with this notion, germline de novo RHEB mutations have been previously reported in three patients with macrocephaly.9 Furthermore, a mouse model expressing a constitutively active form of RHEB (RHEBCA) showed a dose‐dependent phenotype, characterized by no seizures at low RHEBCA levels and spontaneous recurrent seizures increasing proportionally with higher doses in the mutant.10 The findings in human patients and mouse models further strengthen the correlation between the lesion size and variant load.
Our findings support the role of RHEB somatic variants in the etiology of FCD and HME, confirming that both entities are a continuum of mTOR‐related cortical malformations. The detection of somatic variants in lesional tissue relies on deep targeted sequencing to identify mosaic variants at low (<5%) allele frequencies. The finding of recurrent RHEB variants in FCD and HME emphasizes that RHEB should be included with other mTOR pathway genes in sequencing panels for cortical malformations. Precision therapeutic strategies targeting the mTOR pathway are currently under investigation for the treatment of seizures and neurodevelopmental symptoms associated with FCD. For example, an ongoing clinical trial uses the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to treat patients with FCDII who have ongoing seizures after more than two antiepileptic drugs and surgery (NCT03198949).
We thank the families involved in this research and acknowledge the assistance of Kate Pope and Greta Gillies in manuscript preparation.
The authors report no disclosures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) and hemimegalencephaly (HME) are related malformations with shared etiologies. We report three patients with a spectrum of cortical malformations associated with pathogenic brain‐specific somatic Ras homolog enriched in brain (RHEB) variants. The somatic variant load directly correlated with the size of the malformation, with upregulated mTOR activity confirmed in dysplastic tissues. Laser capture microdissection showed enrichment of RHEB variants in dysmorphic neurons and balloon cells. Our findings support the role of RHEB in a spectrum of cortical malformations confirming that FCD and HME represent a disease continuum, with the extent of dysplastic brain directly correlated with the somatic variant load.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Bruce Lefroy Centre, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
2 Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau ‐ Paris Brain Institute ‐ ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France
3 Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France
4 INSERM, UMR 1141, Hôpital Robert‐Debré, Paris, France; Faculté de Médecine Denis Diderot, Université Paris 7, Paris, France; Service d'Anatomie et de Cytologie Pathologiques, Hôpital Lariboisière, APHP, Paris, France
5 Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia
6 Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia