It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mapping the causal effects of one brain region on another is a challenging problem in neuroscience that we approached through invasive direct manipulation of brain function together with concurrent whole-brain measurement of the effects produced. Here we establish a unique resource and present data from 26 human patients who underwent electrical stimulation during functional magnetic resonance imaging (es-fMRI). The patients had medically refractory epilepsy requiring surgically implanted intracranial electrodes in cortical and subcortical locations. One or multiple contacts on these electrodes were stimulated while simultaneously recording BOLD-fMRI activity in a block design. Multiple runs exist for patients with different stimulation sites. We describe the resource, data collection process, preprocessing using the fMRIPrep analysis pipeline and management of artifacts, and provide end-user analyses to visualize distal brain activation produced by site-specific electrical stimulation. The data are organized according to the brain imaging data structure (BIDS) specification, and are available for analysis or future dataset contributions on openneuro.org including both raw and preprocessed data.
Measurement(s) | brain measurement • anatomical image data • functional brain measurement |
Technology Type(s) | magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) • functional magnetic resonance imaging |
Factor Type(s) | pre-surgery versus post-surgery • electrical stimulation (on vs off) |
Sample Characteristic - Organism | Homo sapiens |
Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data:
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Stanford University, Department of Psychology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.4714.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0626)
2 California Institute of Technology, Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pasadena, USA (GRID:grid.20861.3d) (ISNI:0000000107068890)
3 University of Iowa, Department of Neurosurgery, Iowa City, USA (GRID:grid.214572.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8294); University of Iowa, Iowa Neuroscience Institute, Iowa City, USA (GRID:grid.214572.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8294)
4 Stanford University, Department of Psychology, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
5 The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X)
6 Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK (GRID:grid.1006.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0462 7212)