It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
SPECT-CT using radiolabeled phosphonates is considered a standard for assessing bone metabolism (e.g., in patients with osteoarthritis of knee joints). However, SPECT can be influenced by metal artifacts in CT caused by endoprostheses affecting attenuation correction. The current study examined the effects of metal artifacts in CT of a specific endoprosthesis design on quantitative hybrid SPECT-CT imaging.
The implant was positioned inside a phantom homogenously filled with activity (955 MBq 99mTc). CT imaging was performed for different X-ray tube currents (I = 10, 40, 125 mA) and table pitches (p = 0.562 and 1.375). X-ray tube voltage (U = 120 kVp) and primary collimation (16 × 0.625 mm) were kept constant for all scans. The CT reconstruction was performed with five different reconstruction kernels (slice thickness, 1.25 mm and 3.75 mm, each 512 × 512 matrix). Effects from metal artifacts were analyzed for different CT scans and reconstruction protocols. ROI analysis of CT and SPECT data was performed for two slice positions/volumes representing the typical locations for target structures relative to the prosthesis (e.g., femur and tibia). A reference region (homogenous activity concentration without influence from metal artifacts) was analyzed for comparison.
Results
Significant effects caused by CT metal artifacts on attenuation-corrected SPECT were observed for the different slice positions, reconstructed slice thicknesses of CT data, and pitch and CT-reconstruction kernels used (all, p < 0.0001). Based on the optimization, a set of three protocols was identified minimizing the effect of CT metal artifacts on SPECT data. Regarding the reference region, the activity concentration in the anatomically correlated volume was underestimated by 8.9–10.1%. A slight inhomogeneity of the reconstructed activity concentration was detected inside the regions with a median up to 0.81% (p < 0.0001). Using an X-ray tube current of 40 mA showed the best result, balancing quantification and CT exposure.
Conclusion
The results of this study demonstrate the need for the evaluation of SPECT-CT protocols in prosthesis imaging. Phantom experiments demonstrated the possibility for quantitative SPECT-CT of bone turnover in a specific prosthesis design. Meanwhile, a systematic bias caused by metal implants on quantitative SPECT data has to be considered.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307); Otto-von-Guericke University, Research Campus STIMULATE, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307)
2 University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307)
3 University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307)
4 Otto-von-Guericke University, Chair of Medical Systems Technology, Institute of Medical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Magdeburg, Germany (GRID:grid.5807.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 1018 4307)