It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
An outstanding challenge for consciousness research is to characterize the neural signature of conscious access independently of any decisional processes. Here we present a model-based approach that uses inter-trial variability to identify the brain dynamics associated with stimulus processing. We demonstrate that, even in the absence of any task or behavior, the electroencephalographic response to auditory stimuli shows bifurcation dynamics around 250–300 milliseconds post-stimulus. Namely, the same stimulus gives rise to late sustained activity on some trials, and not on others. This late neural activity is predictive of task-related reports, and also of reports of conscious contents that are randomly sampled during task-free listening. Source localization further suggests that task-free conscious access recruits the same neural networks as those associated with explicit report, except for frontal executive components. Studying brain dynamics through variability could thus play a key role for identifying the core signatures of conscious access, independent of report.
Current knowledge on the neural basis of consciousness mostly relies on situations where people report their perception. Here, the authors provide evidence for the idea that bifurcation in brain dynamics reflects conscious perception independent of report.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Université de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France; CNRS, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France (GRID:grid.4444.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 9282)
2 Université de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France (GRID:grid.4444.0); CNRS, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France (GRID:grid.4444.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 9282)
3 Université de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France (GRID:grid.4444.0); CNRS, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France (GRID:grid.4444.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 9282); PSL University, Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Département d’Etudes Cognitives, École normale supérieure, EHESS, CNRS, Paris, France (GRID:grid.440907.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1784 3645)
4 Université de Paris, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France (GRID:grid.440907.e); CNRS, INCC UMR 8002, Paris, France (GRID:grid.4444.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 9282)
5 PSL University, CNRS, Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d’études cognitives, École normale supérieure, Paris, France (GRID:grid.4444.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 9282)
6 Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin Center, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Gif/Yvette, France (GRID:grid.5842.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 2558)