INTRODUCTION:
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), belonging to the family Fabaceae, is a common food on the tables of Brazilians, being a source of vegetable protein. In Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in 2018/19 crop season, 67.7 thousand tons of common black beans were produced in the first harvest and 27.3 thousand tons in the second (CONAB, 2019).
In the search of high yields, seed treatments are frequently used, aiming to reduce losses caused by pathogens and improving the initial stand of the crop. Microbiolization has been used as an alternative to chemical treatment, consisting of the application of beneficial microorganisms (e.g. Trichoderma spp.) to seeds in order to control phytopathogens (MACHADO et al., 2012). This has been used in black oats (BARBIERI et al., 2013), beans (CARVALHO et al., 2011) and corn (LUZ, 2001).
Species of the genus Trichoderma are free-living fungi that interact with soil, roots and leaves. They are widely used in agricultural crops because of their high reproductive capacity and ability to survive under unfavorable conditions, contributing to the stimulation of defense mechanisms against pathogenic fungi (HARMAN, 2000).
The use of biological control agents, such as the fungus Trichoderma harzianum, is one of the alternatives for seed treatment, aiming greater sustainability in agriculture (XU et al., 2011). Although, this fungus is widely used in seed treatment, little is known about the possible interactions between Trichoderma and the early stages of seed germination (MASTOURI et al., 2010), as well as the dosage to be applied, according to antagonist does not impair seed germination and vigor.
SINGH et al. (2016) proposed that doses of Trichoderma asperellum (BHUT8) ranged from 102 to 108 spores mL-1 in the treatment of vegetable seeds. However, the authors reported that depending on the culture, there is a more assertive dose. When it comes to beans, as well as creole varieties of this crop, information about dose of Trichoderma harzianum its still quite scarce.
In this context, the objective of this study was to verify the physiological and sanitary quality of creole bean seeds, var. Chumbinho, after microbiolization with doses of a commercial product (c.p.) with Trichoderma harzianum (strain ESALQ-1306).
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The research was carried out in Erechim (27° 37’50 “S, 52° 14’11” W; 753 m above sea level), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Phaseolus vulgaris beans of the “Chumbinho” creole variety, belonging to the black group, with a life-cycle of approximately 90 days were used. Seeds were obtained from a family estate.
At the beginning of their storage, bean seeds were characterized, showing 14.2% humidity and an electrical conductivity of 93.6 μS cm-1g-1. At the end of the study, the same seeds had 13.4% moisture and an electrical conductivity of 88.1 μS cm-1 g-1.
The treatments evaluated were: T1) 100 mL c.p. containing Trichoderma harzianum (strain ESALQ-1306) at 2.0 x 109 viable conidia mL-1/100 kg seeds; T2) 150 mL c.p./100 kg seeds; T3) 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds; T4) 200 mL chemical treatment (250 g L-1 fipronil + 25 g L-1 pyraclostrobin + 225 g L-1 thiophanate-methyl)/100 kg seeds; and T5) control (without coating of seeds). The doses in T3 and T4 followed the recommendations of the manufacturers. The doses in T1 and T2 were below that recommended by the manufacturer. To evaluate these treatments, tests were performed in duplicate and in a randomized design:
1) Sanitary test (blotter test): eight replicates of 25 seeds were placed in plastic germination boxes - gerbox (11 x 11 x 3.5 cm) containing two sheets of sterilized and moistened germitest paper. The boxes were placed in an incubator at 20 ± 2 °C for 7 days, with a 12 hour photoperiod, when the fungi were identified (BRASIL, 2009a).
2) Germination test: for each treatment, 200 seeds were placed on sterilized and moistened germitest paper, and kept in an incubator chamber at 25 ± 1 °C with a 12 hour photoperiod. First and second counts of germinated seeds were performed at five and nine days after the start of incubation, respectively (BRASIL, 2009b).
3) Soilless cold test: seedless seedlings were incubated at 10 ± 2 °C for three days, without light. Afterwards, they were placed in an incubator at 25 ± 1 °C, with a 12 hour photoperiod for four days, at which point, normal seedlings were counted (BARROS et al., 1999).
4) Accelerated aging test: for each treatment, 200 seeds were distributed on aluminum screens, suspended in boxes containing 40 mL distilled water. The gerbox were kept in an incubator chamber for 72 hours at 42 ± 1 ºC (MARCOS FILHO et al., 1987), and then the germination test was carried out as described above (BRASIL, 2009b).
5) Speed of germination rate (SGR): for each treatment, 200 seeds were distributed on sterilized and moistened germitest paper. Samples were incubated at 25 ± 1 °C, with a 12 hour photoperiod, and germinated seeds were evaluated daily by counting normal seedlings until the fifth day, along with the germination test (MAGUIRE, 1962).
6) Shoot and root seedling length: four replicates of 20 seeds were seeded on the upper third of a sheet of germitest paper. Samples were kept in an incubator chamber at 25 ± 1 °C, with a 12 hour photoperiod and, on day 5, the shoots and roots of 10 normal seedlings per replicate were measured. The measurements were made with a ruler graduated in millimeters, mm (NAKAGAWA, 1999).
7) Emergence in a greenhouse: four replicates of 50 seeds were sown in 128 well trays filled with autoclaved commercial substrate (DackoTM). The trays were kept in a greenhouse, with two daily irrigations by micro sprinkler system of 2 min and 5-10 min each, one at 10:00 hours and the other at 17:00 hours. A seedling count was performed on the tenth day after the start of the test (SENA et al., 2017).
The data obtained were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the F test (P ≤ 0.05) and, when significant, Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05). The analyses were performed with ASSISTAT, beta version 7.7 statistical software (SILVA & AZEVEDO, 2016).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
In the sanitary evaluation of bean seeds (Table 1), all treatments grew the grain storage fungi Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. Trichoderma harzianum, derived from the commercial product used to treat the seeds, also grew, though it was less evident in the chemical treatment. Fusarium oxysporum, and Macrophomina phaseolina, etiological agents of wilt and stem rot in common bean (WENDLAND et al., 2016), were also identified in the samples.
Table 1 Incidence (%) of fungi Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., Trichoderma spp., Fusarium oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseolina in seeds of P. vulgaris var. Chumbinho, treated with doses of the commercial product based on Trichoderma harzianum and with fungicide.
Treatment | ----------------------------------------------------------------Incidence (%)---------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||
Aspergillus spp. | Penicillium spp. | Fusarium oxysporum | Trichoderma spp. | Macrophomina phaseolina | |
100 mL c.p.1 | 0.06ns | 0.18 a3 | 0.56 a | 11.68 c | 0.12ns |
150 mL c.p. | 0.12 | 0.06 a | 0.18 a | 12.43 c | 0.06 |
200 mL c.p. | 0.25 | 0.12 a | 0.31 a | 11.56 c | 0.06 |
Fungicide2 | 0.12 | 0.12 a | 1.00 a | 0.18 a | 0.06 |
Control | 0.50 | 1.93 b | 1.68 b | 1.62 b | 0.00 |
CV (%)4 | 17.95 | 11.22 | 17.44 | 7.18 | 7.56 |
1Based on T. harzianum (strain ESALQ-1306) at 2.0 x 109 viable conidia mL-1; dose for 100 kg seeds; 2250 g L-1 fipronil + 25 g L-1 pyraclostrobin + 225 g L-1 thiophanate-methyl/100 kg seeds; 3Means followed by the same letter do not differ by Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05); transformed data [(x + 1) ^ 0.5]. 4Coefficient of variation. nsnot significant.
Treatments with Trichoderma harzianum (100, 150 and 200 mL) and the chemical treatment did not differ statistically from the control, though they presented with a lower incidence of Aspergillus spp. and Macrophomina phaseolina on the creole bean seeds (Table 1), or because the isolate of Trichoderma spp. probably there was no antagonistic control of this fungi (MIGLIORINI et al., 2012).
Evaluating Trichoderma isolates as biological agents for the control of M. phaseolina in soybean, KHALILI et al. (2016) observed an incidence of only 5.5% after seed treatment, while that of the control reached 49%. This response might be due to the release of volatile compounds capable of inhibiting phytopathogenic growth. These authors also highlighted the importance of selection by isolates of Trichoderma spp. obtained in the locality or region where M. phaseolina occurs, because taking into consideration the evolution of the antagonist, such isolates would be more competent in relation to the phytopathogens present in a given location.
All doses of T. harzianum significantly reduced the incidence of Fusarium spp., Similar to the chemical fungicide (Table 1). However, this efficiency varies according to the isolate of Trichoderma spp. and the bean cultivar (CARVALHO et al., 2011), and also depends on the plant species to which the antagonist will apply (MIGLIORINI et al., 2012).
ZHANG et al. (2017) reported that soybean plants using Trichoderma to control rot caused by F. oxysporum had increased O2 and H2O2 levels compared to control plants. These results suggested that accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) could be one of the mechanisms by which Trichoderma-treated soybeans induce resistance to plant diseases.
For seed germination, 100 mL c.p./100 kg seeds showed higher levels (84%) than 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds (74%), being 4% higher than the germination obtained in the control (80%) (Table 2). The use of Trichoderma spp. can promote germination of seeds by the production of hormones. According to BUCIO et al. (2015), T. harzianum produces harzianic acid and isoharzianic acid, which promote plant growth.
Table 2 Percentages of germination, first count, cold test, accelerated aging and speed of germination rate of seeds of P. vulgaris var. Chumbinho treated with doses of the commercial product based on Trichoderma harzianum and with fungicide.
Treatment | Germination | First count | Cold test | Accelerated aging | Speed of germination rate |
-----------------------------------------------(%)----------------------------------------------- | |||||
100 mL c.p.1 | 84 a3 | 78 a | 69 b | 73 a | 10.6 a |
150 mL c.p. | 78 ab | 56 b | 80 a | 66 ab | 8.5 ab |
200 mL c.p. | 74 b | 58 b | 67 b | 57 b | 8.2 b |
Fungicide2 | 77 ab | 57 b | 74 ab | 66 ab | 8.1 b |
Control | 80 ab | 63 ab | 73 ab | 71 a | 8.5 ab |
CV (%)4 | 6.3 | 19.6 | 9.0 | 13.9 | 16.3 |
1Based on T. harzianum (strain ESALQ-1306) at 2.0 x 109 viable conidia mL-1; dose for 100 kg seeds; 2250 g L-1 fipronil + 25 g L-1 pyraclostrobin + 225 g L-1 thiophanate-methyl/100 kg seeds; 3Means followed by the same letter do not differ by Tukey’s test (P≤0.05); transformed data [(x + 1) ^ 0.5]. 4Coefficient of variation. nsnot significant.
Conversely, excessive production of indole acetic acid (IAA), ethylene (TAIZ & ZEIGER, 2009), auxins and cytokinins hormones (BROTMAN et al., 2010) inhibit cell division and elongation, impairing germination and the development of seedling. In this context, REIS et al. (2019) reported that the dose of Trichoderma spp. on cowpea seeds treatment were effective up to 4.8 x 108 CFU g-1 ensuring better seed germination and root development.
Treatment with 100 mL c.p./100 kg seeds resulted in a first germination count of 78%, a 15% increase over the control treatment (63%), though not statistically different (Table 2). In the first count, treatments with 150 and 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds and the chemical treatment caused a reduction in normal seedlings of 56%, 58% and 57%, respectively.
In the cold test, treatment with 150 mL c.p./100 kg seeds resulted in the highest germination percentage (80%), though it did not differ statistically from the chemical (74%) and control treatments (73%) (Table 2). Treatments of 100 and 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds produced 69% and 67% germination, respectively, demonstrating that these doses were harmful to seed germination in the cold test.
According to BARROS et al. (1999), it is normal for germination results in soil-free cold tests to be similar to those of the standard germination test, which occurred in the current study with the treatment 150 mL c.p./100 kg seeds and the control (without coating).
In the accelerated aging test (Table 2), treatment with 100 mL c.p./100 kg seeds and the control had the highest germination levels of 73% and 71%, respectively, compared to 57% for the 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds dose. SINGH et al. (2014) reported that the incubation temperature of several fungal isolates, such as Fusarium sp., Penicillium sp. and Trichoderma was 30 °C, demonstrating that none of the Trichoderma species grew above 40 °C. This might explain why increased temperatures did not benefit the vigor of the seeds.
In the speed of germination rate test (Table 2), treatment with 100 mL c.p./100 kg seed showed a better result (10.6) than with 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds (8.2) and the chemical treatment (8.1). An increase in germination speed is an advantage in grain production, because it reduces the time needed to establish a crop, giving it a competitive advantage against other plants, which can reduce productivity by 60-70% (SALGADO et al., 2007).
With regard to seedling length, treatment with 150 mL c.p./100 kg seeds was superior to 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds and the chemical treatment (Table 3). In addition, treatments with T. harzianum at different doses showed a longer root length than the chemical treatment, though not differing from the control (without coating).
Table 3 Length of aerial part (cm), root length (cm) and seedling emergence (%), of seeds of P. vulgaris var. Chumbinho treated with doses of the commercial product based on Trichoderma harzianum and with fungicide.
Treatment | Length of aerial part | Root length | Seedling emergence (%) |
-------------------------------------(cm)------------------------------------- | |||
100 mL c.p.1 | 9.18 ab3 | 16.85 a | 80.7 ab |
150 mL c.p. | 10.32 a | 16.98 a | 79.3 ab |
200 mL c.p. | 9.95 ab | 16.55 a | 83.3 a |
Fungicide2 | 8.95 b | 14.88 b | 62.7 b |
Control | 9.08 b | 15.78 ab | 65.3 ab |
CV (%)4 | 8.67 | 5.99 | 9.22 |
1Based on T. harzianum (strain ESALQ-1306) at 2.0 x 109 viable conidia mL-1; dose for 100 kg seeds; 2250 g L-1 fipronil + 25 g L-1 pyraclostrobin + 225 g L-1 thiophanate-methyl/100 kg seeds; 3Means followed by the same letter do not differ by Tukey’s test (P≤0.05); 4Coefficient of variation. nsnot significant.
The chemical treatment resulted in both lower shoot and root lengths. For greenhouse plant emergence, treatment with 200 mL c.p./100 kg seeds showed a higher level of emerged seedlings (83.3%) than the chemical treatment (62.7%; Table 3).
The performance of Trichoderma spp. for biological control of diseases can be quite variable, depending on the species used and the edaphoclimatic conditions under which the tests are conducted. According to the current study and that of ZHANG et al. (2017), plants colonized by Trichoderma showed a great capacity for combatting attacks by pathogenic fungi, improving seed potential.
CONCLUSION:
The dose of 100 mL c.p. of Trichoderma harzianum (strain ESALQ-1306 at 2.0 x 109 viable conidia mL-1) per 100 kg seeds reduces the incidence of Penicillium spp. and Fusarium oxysporum, improving the sanitary aspect. This dose does not affect the physiological quality of the creole bean seeds, var. Chumbinho.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS) - Campus Erechim, for the institutional support for this research. To Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Brasil, for granting scholarships to the 2nd and 4th authors, respectively. Our gratitude also to the ‘Ad hoc’ evaluators who reviewed our work and contributed to its improvement.
E-mail: [email protected]. * Corresponding author.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors contributed equally for the conception and writing of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved of the final version.
BARBIERI, M. et al. Physiological quality of Avena strigosa Schreb seed. cv. Common subjected to accelerated aging. Revista Monografias Ambientais, v.1, n.3, p.2837-2845, 2013. Available from: <Available from: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/10822 >. Accessed: May, 20, 2019. doi: 10.5902/2236130810822.
BARROS, A. S. do R. et al. Teste de frio. In: KRZYZANOWSKI, F. C. et al. (Ed.). Vigor de sementes: conceitos e testes. Londrina : ABRATES, 1999. Chap.5, p.1-15.
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Manual de análise sanitária de sementes. Brasília : Mapa/ACS, 200p., 2009a.
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Regras para análise de sementes. Brasília : Mapa/ACS , 399p., 2009b.
BROTMAN, Y. et al. Trichoderma. Current Biology, v.20, p.R390-R391, 2010. Available from: <Available from: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(10)00230-7.pdf >. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2019.
BUCIO, L, B. et al. Trichoderma as biostimulant: exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Scientia Horticulturae, v.196, p.109-123, 2015. Available from: <Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030442381530162X >. Accessed: Apr. 02, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.043.
CARVALHO, D. D. C. et al. Controle de Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. phaseoli in vitro e em sementes, e promoção do crescimento inicial do feijoeiro comum por Trichoderma harzianum. Tropical Plant Pathology, v.36, p.28-34, 2011. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1982-56762011000100004 >. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2019. doi: 10.1590/S1982-56762011000100004.
CONAB. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de grãos - nono levantamento, v.6, n.9, 49p., 2019. Available from: <Available from: http://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos/boletim-da-safra-de graos?limitstart=0 >. Accessed: Jun. 13 2019.
HARMAN, G. E. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol: Changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Disease, v.84, p.377-393, 2000. Available from: <Available from: http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.377 >. Accessed: Jun. 13, 2019. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.377.
KHALILI, E. et al. Evaluation of Trichoderma isolates as potential biological control agent against soybean charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina, Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, v.30, n.3, p.479-488, 2016. Available from: <Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13102818.2016.1147334 >. Accessed: Jul. 03, 2019. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2016.1147334.
LUZ, W. C. Effect of bioprotectors on seed pathogens, seed emergence, and corn yield. Fitopatologia Brasileira, n.26, p.16-20, 2001. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-41582001000100003&lng=en&nrm=iso >. Accessed: May, 20, 2019. doi: 10.1590/S0100-41582001000100003.
MACHADO, D. F. M. et al. Trichoderma no Brasil: o fungo e o bioagente. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, v.35, n.26, p.274-288, 2012. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2012000100026 >. Accessed: Mar. 20, 2019.
MAGUIRE, J. D. Speed of germination - aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emerge and vigor. Crop Science, v.2, p.176-177, 1962. Available from: <Available from: http://www.crops.org/publications/cs/pdfs/2/2/CS0020020176 >. Accessed: Apr. 02, 2019. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200020033x.
MARCOS FILHO, J. et al. Avaliação da qualidade das sementes. Piracicaba: FEALQ, 1987. 230p.
MASTOURI, F. et al. Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology, v.100, p.1213-1221. 2010. Available from: <Available from: http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/pdf/10.1094/PHYTO-03-10-0091 >. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2019. doi: 10.1094/ PHYTO-03-10-0091.
MIGLIORINI, P. et al. Efeito do tratamento quimico e biológico na qualidade fisiológica e sanitária de sementes canola. Enciclopédia Biosfera, v.8, p.788-801, 2012. Available from: <Available from: http://www.conhecer.org.br/enciclop/2012b/ciencias%20agrarias/efeito%20do%20tratamento >. Accessed: Apr. 07, 2019.
NAKAGAWA, J. Testes de vigor baseados no desempenho das plântulas. In: KRYZANOVSKI, F. C. et al. (Ed.). Vigor de sementes: conceitos e testes. Londrina: Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia de sementes, 218p., 1999.
REIS, H. et al. Efficiency of application of Trichoderma on the physiological quality and health of cowpea seeds. Comunicata Scientiae, v.10, n.2, p.301-307, 2019. Available from: <Available from: https://comunicatascientiae.com.br/comunicata/article/view/1388 >. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2019. doi: 10.14295/cs.v10i2.1388.
SALGADO, T. P. et al. Interferência das plantas daninhas no feijoeiro carioca. Planta Daninha, v.25, n.3, p.443-448, 2007. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582007000300002&lng=en&nrm=iso >. Accessed: Apr. 07, 2019. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582007000300002.
SENA, D. V. A. et al. Vigor tests to evaluate the physiological quality of corn seeds cv. ‘Sertanejo’. Ciência Rural, v.47, n.3, e20150705, 2017. Available from: <Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017000300151&lng=en&nrm=iso >. Accessed: Apr. 02, 2019. doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150705.
SILVA, F. de A. S.; AZEVEDO, C. A. V. de. The Assistat Software Version 7.7 and its use in the analysis of experimental data. African Journal of Agricultural Research, v.11, n.39, p.3733-3740, 2016. Available from: <Available from: http://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-full-text-pdf/5E8596460818 >. Accessed: Mar. 06, 2017. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2016.11522.
SINGH, A. et al. Optimal Physical Parameters for Growth of Trichoderma Species at Varying pH, Temperature and Agitation. Virology & Mycology. v.3, 2014. Available from: <Available from: http://www.longdom.org/open-access/optimal-physical-parameters-for-growth-of-trichoderma-species-at-varying-ph-temperature-and-agitation-2161-0517.1000127.pdf >. Accessed: Mar. 20, 2019. doi: 10.4172/2161-0517.100012. (Electronic publication).
SINGH, V. et al. Trichoderma asperellum spore dose depended modulation of plant growth in vegetable crops. Microbiological Research, n.193, p.74-86, 2016. Available from: <Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094450131630218X >. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.09.002.
TAIZ, L.; ZEIGER, E. Fisiologia vegetal. 4. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009. 848p.
WENDLAND, A. et al. Doenças do Feijoeiro. In: AMORIM, L. Manual de Fitopatologia: Doenças das Plantas Cultivadas, 5 ed., v.2, Ouro Fino: Editora Agronômica Ceres Ltda, 2016. p.383-396.
XU, M.X. et al. Combined use of biocontrol agentes to manage plant diseases in theory and practice. Phytopathology, v.101, n.9, p.1024-1031, 2011. Available from: <Available from: https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/pdf/10.1094/PHYTO-08-10-0216 >. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2019. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-10-0216.
ZHANG, K. et al. Trichoderma harzianum containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase and chitinase improved growth and diminished adverse effect caused by Fusarium oxysporum in soybean. Journal of Plant Physiology, v.10, p.84-94, 2017. Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176161716302632?via%3Dihub >. Accessed: Mar. 20, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.10.012.
Laís Dalzotto1
Brenda Tortelli2
Francine Spitza Stefanski3
Deivid Sacon4
Vanessa Neumann Silva5
Paola Mendes Milanesi3
1Cooperativa de Produção e Consumo Familiar Nossa Terra, Erechim, RS, Brasil.
2Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia (PPGAgro), Bolsista Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (PROSUC/CAPES), Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF), Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil.
3Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Campus Erechim. Laboratório de Fitopatologia, 99700-970, Erechim, RS, Brasil.
4Programa de Pós-graduação em Fitopatologia, Mestrando, Bolsista Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) , Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, MG, Brasil.
5Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Campus Chapecó, Laboratório de Sementes e Grãos, Chapecó, SC, Brasil
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
In the search for improved yields, seed treatment by microbiolization has been used as an alternative to chemical treatment. The objective was to verify the physiological and sanitary quality of creole bean seeds, var. Chumbinho, after microbiolization with doses of a commercial product (c.p.) with Trichoderma harzianum (strain ESALQ-1306). The treatments were: T1) 100 mL c.p./100 kg seeds; T2) 150 mL c.p.; T3) 200 mL c.p.; T4) 200 mL of chemical treatment (c.p., 250 g L-1 fipronil + 25 g L-1 pyraclostrobin + 225 g L-1 thiophanate-methyl); and T5) control (without coating of seeds). The tests were: sanitary test (blotter test); germination and first count; accelerated aging, cold germination without soil, speed of germination rate (SGR), seedling shoot and root lengths, and emergence of seedlings in a greenhouse. T. harzianum controlled Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp. and Fusarium oxysporum. With 100 mL c.p. of T. harzianum dose had better results for the germination and vigor, and this dose it is an alternative to chemical treatment in creole bean seeds.