Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are advancing into human clinical trials, with emphasis on eliciting high titres of neutralising antibodies against the viral spike (S). However, the merits of broadly targeting S versus focusing antibody onto the smaller receptor binding domain (RBD) are unclear. Here we assess prototypic S and RBD subunit vaccines in homologous or heterologous prime-boost regimens in mice and non-human primates. We find S is highly immunogenic in mice, while the comparatively poor immunogenicity of RBD is associated with limiting germinal centre and T follicular helper cell activity. Boosting S-primed mice with either S or RBD significantly augments neutralising titres, with RBD-focussing driving moderate improvement in serum neutralisation. In contrast, both S and RBD vaccines are comparably immunogenic in macaques, eliciting serological neutralising activity that generally exceed levels in convalescent humans. These studies confirm recombinant S proteins as promising vaccine candidates and highlight multiple pathways to achieving potent serological neutralisation.

Current vaccine strategies for SARS-CoV-2 focus on eliciting neutralising antibodies to the spike protein (S), but differences in immunogenicity of full-length S versus receptor binding domain (RBD) only aren’t fully understood. Here, the authors show immunogenicity of different prime-boost strategies with S and/or RBD in mice and macaques.

Details

Title
Immunogenicity of prime-boost protein subunit vaccine strategies against SARS-CoV-2 in mice and macaques
Author
Tan Hyon-Xhi 1 ; Juno, Jennifer A 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Lee Wen Shi 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Barber-Axthelm Isaac 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kelly, Hannah G 2 ; Wragg, Kathleen M 1 ; Esterbauer Robyn 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Amarasena Thakshila 1 ; Mordant, Francesca L 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Subbarao Kanta 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Kent, Stephen J 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Wheatley, Adam K 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X) 
 University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); University of Melbourne, Australian Research Council Centre for Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X) 
 University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) 
 University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); University of Melbourne, Australian Research Council Centre for Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); Monash University, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre and Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857) 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20411723
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2495701511
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.