It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Understanding mechanisms controlling fluid injection-triggered seismicity is key in defining strategies to ameliorate it. Recent triggered events (e.g. Pohang, Mw 5.5) have exceeded predictions of average energy release by a factor of >1000x, necessitating robust methodologies to both define critical antecedent conditions and to thereby constrain anticipated event size. We define maximum event magnitudes resulting from triggering as a function of pre-existing critical stresses and fluid injection volume. Fluid injection experiments on prestressed laboratory faults confirm these estimates of triggered moment magnitudes for varied boundary conditions and injection rates. In addition, observed ratios of shear slip to dilation rates on individual faults signal triggering and may serve as a measurable proxy for impending rupture. This new framework provides a robust method of constraining maximum event size for preloaded faults and unifies prior laboratory and field observations that span sixteen decades in injection volume and four decades in length scale.
Recently triggered seismic events such as the Pohang earthquake have exceeded predictions of average energy releases by a factor of 1000. A new framework is proposed to define maximum event magnitudes as a function of pre-existing critical stresses and fluid injection volume.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281); The Pennsylvania State University, G3 Center and EMS Energy Institute, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
2 The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281); The Pennsylvania State University, G3 Center and EMS Energy Institute, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281); The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Geosciences, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
3 The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281); The Pennsylvania State University, G3 Center and EMS Energy Institute, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281); University of Calgary, Calgary, Department of Geoscience, Alberta, Canada (GRID:grid.22072.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7697)
4 Department of Energy, Washington, USA (GRID:grid.85084.31) (ISNI:0000000123423717)
5 Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, USA (GRID:grid.417824.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0020 7392)
6 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)
7 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, USA (GRID:grid.148313.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0428 3079)
8 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA (GRID:grid.250008.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 9702)
9 National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, USA (GRID:grid.451363.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2206 3094)
10 National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, USA (GRID:grid.419357.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2199 3636)
11 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, USA (GRID:grid.135519.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0446 2659)
12 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, USA (GRID:grid.451303.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 3491)
13 Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, USA (GRID:grid.474520.0) (ISNI:0000000121519272)
14 Sanford Underground Research Facility, Lead, USA (GRID:grid.474520.0)
15 TDoeGeo Rock Fracture Consulting and Golder Associates, Redmond, USA (GRID:grid.474520.0)
16 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA (GRID:grid.223827.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2193 0096)
17 Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA (GRID:grid.254549.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8155)
18 Stanford University, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
19 Mattson Hydrology LLC, Idaho Falls, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e)
20 Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA (GRID:grid.29857.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4281)
21 Rice University, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.21940.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8278)
22 University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA (GRID:grid.266900.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0447 0018)
23 University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.28803.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 0701 8607)
24 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, USA (GRID:grid.263790.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0704 1727)
25 ResFrac, Palo Alto, USA (GRID:grid.263790.9)