It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
With the recent FDA approval of tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) status as a biomarker for treatment with a PD-1 inhibitor regardless of tumor type, accurate assessment of patient-specific TMB is more critical now more than ever. Using paired tumor and germline exome sequencing data from 701 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma, including 575 self-reported White patients and 126 self-reported Black patients, we observed that compared to the gold standard of filtering germline variants with patient-paired germline sequencing data, TMB estimates were significantly higher in both Black and White patients when using public databases for filtering non-somatic mutations; however, TMB was more significantly inflated in Black patients compared to White patients. TMB as a biomarker for patient selection to receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy without patient-paired germline sequencing may introduce racial bias due to the under-representation of minority groups in public databases.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Mayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Jacksonville, USA (GRID:grid.417467.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0443 9942); Precision Cancer Therapeutics of Mayo Clinic’s Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.417467.7)
2 Hackensack University Medical Center, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, USA (GRID:grid.239835.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 0407 6328)
3 Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Scottsdale, USA (GRID:grid.417468.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8875 6339)
4 Mayo Clinic, Departments of Immunology and Urology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
5 Mayo Clinic, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)
6 Precision Cancer Therapeutics of Mayo Clinic’s Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a); Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Scottsdale, USA (GRID:grid.417468.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8875 6339)
7 Precision Cancer Therapeutics of Mayo Clinic’s Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.417468.8); Mayo Clinic, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.66875.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0459 167X)