It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The aerosol oxidative potential (OP) is considered to better represent the acute health hazards of aerosols than the mass concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The proposed major contributors to OP are water soluble transition metals and organic compounds, but the relative magnitudes of these compounds to the total OP are not yet fully understood. In this study, as the first step toward the numerical prediction of OP, the cumulative OP (OPtm*) based on the top five key transition metals, namely, Cu, Mn, Fe, V, and Ni, was defined. The solubilities of metals were assumed constant over time and space based on measurements. Then, the feasibility of its prediction was verified by comparing OPtm* values based on simulated metals to that based on observed metals in East Asia. PM2.5 typically consists of primary and secondary species, while OPtm* only represents primary species. This disparity caused differences in the domestic contributions of PM2.5 and OPtm*, especially in large cities in western Japan. The annual mean domestic contributions of PM2.5 were 40%, while those of OPtm* ranged from 50 to 55%. Sector contributions to the OPtm* emissions in Japan were also assessed. The main important sectors were the road brake and iron–steel industry sectors, followed by power plants, road exhaust, and railways.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.237586.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0597 9981); University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.20515.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2369 4728)
2 Japan Automobile Research Institute (JARI), Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.471608.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0462 9226)
3 National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.140139.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0746 5933)
4 Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Shinjuku, Japan (GRID:grid.474297.b)
5 St. Luke’s International University, Chuo, Japan (GRID:grid.419588.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0318 6320)
6 Keio University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan (GRID:grid.26091.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9959)
7 Kyoto University, Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science (KURNS), Kumatori, Japan (GRID:grid.258799.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 2033); Ibaraki University, College of Science, Mito, Japan (GRID:grid.410773.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9949 0476)