Cloning and functional characterization of seed-specific LEC1A promoter from peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Abstract

The expression of many genes involved with maturation processes are downregulated in lec1 mutant seeds [9, 14, 15]. [...]the role of LEC1 was also demonstrated by analyzing its gain-of-function mutant. The results showed that the regulatory region containing 82bp of 5’ UTR and 2228bp promoter could specifically regulate AhLEC1A expressing in developing seeds. [...]the AhLEC1A promoter could be utilized as a seed-preferential promoter for plant genetic engineering. According to the BD Genome Walker Universal Kit (Clontech, USA) manufacturer’s instructions, each of 2.5 μg genomic DNA was digested with four restriction enzyme DraI, EcoRV, PvuII, and StuI respectively; and then the digested samples were connected with the BD Genome-Walker adaptor resulting in the library containing digestions by DraI, EcoRV, PvuII, and StuI (LD, LE, LP, and LS). According to the cDNA sequence of AhLEC1A, two 3’ terminus gene-specific primers TSS LEC1AGSP1-1 and TSS LEC1AGSP2-2 were designed, for use in the nested PCR reaction.

About the Authors:

Guiying Tang

Roles Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Bio-Tech Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Jinan, Shandong, China

Pingli Xu

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

Affiliation: Bio-Tech Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Jinan, Shandong, China

Pengxiang Li

Roles Formal analysis, Software

Affiliations Bio-Tech Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Jinan, Shandong, China, College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China

Jieqiong Zhu

Roles Methodology, Resources

Affiliations Bio-Tech Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Jinan, Shandong, China, College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China

Guangxia Chen

Roles Data curation, Methodology

Affiliation: Shandong Academy of Grape, Jinan, Shandong, China

Lei Shan

Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected] (LS); [email protected] (SW)

Affiliations Bio-Tech Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Jinan, Shandong, China, College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China

Shubo Wan

Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected] (LS); [email protected] (SW)

Affiliations Bio-Tech Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Jinan, Shandong, China, College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China

Introduction

Seed development is a complex procedure of the flowering plant in life cycle, which can conceptually be divided into two distinct phases: embryo morphogenesis and seed maturation [1, 2]. Lots of genes highly and specifically expressed in different developmental processes highlight the importance of transcriptional regulations for proper seed formation [3]. The Arabidopsis LAFL genes coding for LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1), ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3), FUSCA3 (FUS3), and LEC2, respectively form a network involved in regulating seeds development [4–7].

LEC1 is a central regulator controlling embryogenesis and seed maturation in Arabidopsis thaliana [8–10]. It expresses primarily in the embryo and endosperm, particularly during seed development [9, 11]. Loss of LEC1 function causes a pleiotropic phenotype, including cotyledon with trichomes, distortions in suspensor-cell specification, defects in storage protein and lipid accumulation, embryo desiccation-intolerance in developing seeds, and leaf primordia initiation [8, 12, 13]. The expression of many genes involved with maturation processes are downregulated in lec1 mutant seeds [9, 14, 15]. Moreover, the role of LEC1 was also demonstrated by analyzing its gain-of-function mutant. For example, overexpression of LEC1 in developing seeds elevates the contents of seed storage macromolecule, as well, upregulates the key genes involved in storage protein and lipid accumulation in a number of plant species [16–20]. Genome-wide analysis of LEC1 occupancy and interactome indicated that LEC1 regulate many genes involved in embryo development [14, 15]. Recently, several researches indicated that LEC1, a central regulator of seed development, interacts with different combinations of ABI3, bZIP67, FUS3, and other TFs to regulate diverse developmental processes at different stages of seed development [21, 22].

LEC1 also participates in regulating post-embryonic growth during the developmental transition from germination seeds to seedlings. In higher plants, rapid elongation of hypocotyl in germinating seeds can be induced by darkness. However, lec1 mutant causes a reduced capability for hypocotyl elongation and apical hook formation [14, 23]. Additionally, the expression of LEC1 was also detectable in etiolated seedlings [24, 25], and the phenotype of longer hypocotyls and higher expression levels of the genes involved in etiolated growth were observed in LEC1-overexpression plants [26]. A LEC1 gain-of-function mutant turnip (tnp), displayed the partial de-etiolation at dark-grown condition, including inhibited hypocotyls elongation, and activated SAM (shoots apical meristem) [27].

Despite of such comprehensive knowledge about LEC1 in the model plant Arabidopsis, much less is known about the expression patterns and functions in other higher plants. Here, the 2707bp 5’ flanking region of peanut AhLEC1A was isolated, and the GUS expression profiles driven by a series of deletion in its 5’ flanking region were characterized in transgenic Arabidopsis. The results showed that the regulatory region containing 82bp of 5’ UTR and 2228bp promoter could specifically regulate AhLEC1A expressing in developing seeds. Thus, the AhLEC1A promoter could be utilized as a seed-preferential promoter for plant genetic engineering.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. cv. Luhua 14) seeds, Arabidopsis thaliana L. (Ecotypes Col) seeds, Escherichia coli strain DH5α, pCAMBIA3301 plasmid and Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 used in the present study were maintained at our laboratory. Peanut plants were grown in the experimental field of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Roots, stems and leaves of 14-day seedlings, flowers, and the developing seeds were collected and kept in -80°C refrigerator for isolation of total RNA.

Cloning of the 5’ flanking region of AhLEC1A

The peanut genomic DNA was isolated from Luhua 14 leaves using CTAB method [28]. Genome walking was performed to isolate the 5’ flanking regulatory region. According to the BD Genome Walker Universal Kit (Clontech, USA) manufacturer’s instructions, each of 2.5 μg genomic DNA was digested with four restriction enzyme DraI, EcoRV, PvuII, and StuI respectively; and then the digested samples were connected with the BD Genome-Walker adaptor resulting in the library containing digestions by DraI, EcoRV, PvuII, and StuI (LD, LE, LP, and LS). Based on the sequence of AhLEC1A genomic DNA, two nested gene-specific primers (GSP), LEC1AGSP1-2 and LEC1AGSP2-2, were designed. The first round of PCR reaction was done in a 25μL reaction system using an AP1 provided by Kit and LEC1A GSP1-2 as 5’ terminal and 3’ terminus primer, and 1μL DNA of each library as template. The nested PCR reaction was also performed using the same volume and conditions with primers AP2 and LEC1AGSP2-2, and 1μL of the 10-fold diluted primary PCR products as template. The specific PCR fragments from the second round reaction were isolated and inserted into the vector pEASY-T3. The recombinants harboring the target gene were validated by two-way sequencing using ABI3730 model DNA sequencer. The primer and adaptor sequences of this assay were listed in Table 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. List of primers used in the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.t001

Precise identification of transcription start site in AhLEC1A

The transcription start site of AhLEC1A gene was identified by 5’ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) using a 5’ RACE kit (Invitrogen GeneRacer™ Kit) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Total RNA was extracted from the developing seeds of peanut Luhua 14 using the improved CTAB method [29]. The ds-cDNA was synthesized using the full-length mRNA with RNA Oligo as template. The ds-cDNA was cloned into vector pCR4-TOPO to establish the full-length cDNA library. According to the cDNA sequence of AhLEC1A, two 3’ terminus gene-specific primers TSS LEC1AGSP1-1 and TSS LEC1AGSP2-2 were designed, for use in the nested PCR reaction. The 5’ terminus general primer for two rounds of PCR were GeneRacer™ Primer and 5’ Nested Primer. 1μL of the full-length cDNA library as got previously and a 50-fold dilution of the primary PCR product was used respectively as the template of the two rounds of PCR. The nested PCR products were collected and sequenced by ABI3730 model DNA sequencer. The primer sequences used in the assay were listed in Table 1.

Expression analysis of AhLEC1A gene in various organs

The expression analysis was performed by qRT-PCR using ABI 7500 instrument. Gene-specific primers were designed according to AhLEC1A cDNA sequence (Table 1). The first-stand cDNAs of AhLEC1A were amplified using SYBR premix Ex Taq polymerase (Takara). Its relative expression level was analyzed using AhACTIN7 as the reference gene by the 2-ΔΔCT method [30]. Three sample repetitions with technical triplicates were set in the experiment.

In-silico analysis of the AhLEC1A promoter for cis-regulatory elements

The cis-elements of the 5’ flanking region of AhLEC1A gene were analyzed using PLACE (http://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE) and Plant Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements (Plant CARE) (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/).

Plasmid construction and Arabidopsis transformation

A series of 5’ -truncated promoter sequences were obtained by PCR using a single reverse primer localized in 5’ UTR of AhLEC1A, and different forward primers situated in the different sites of the AhLEC1A promoter (The primer sequences were listed in Table 1). To construct the vector, the appropriate restriction sites were introduced into the PCR-amplified promoter (HindIII at the 5’ end; NcoI at the 3’ end). The PCR-amplified promoter was then inserted into HindIII/NcoI-digested pCAMBIA3301, replacing the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, producing seven deletion constructs containing various fragments (-2228 ~ +82, Q7; -1254 ~ +82, Q6; -935 ~ +82, Q5; -721 ~ +82, Q4; -617 ~ +82, Q3; -354 ~ +82, Q2; -105 ~ +82, Q1).

The constructs including Q1-Q7 and the control pCAMBIA3301 was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 using a freeze-thaw method. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants were generated by the floral dip method. The seeds of the T0-T2 generations were germinated on 1/2MS0 agar medium containing 10μg/L Basta. The copy number in transgenic plants was determined by segregation ratio of the plants with and without basta-resistance. The T1 transgenic lines with single copy gene have the 3:1 ratio of resistant plants to non-resistant plants. The homozygous lines of T2 generation were screened on basta-resistant 1/2MS0 medium. More than eight homozygous lines respectively carrying single copy gene of Q1-Q7 and the control pCAMBIA3301 were obtained. The identified transgenic plants were transferred to soil under 120 μmol·m-2·s-1light in a growth room at a temperature between 22°C and 25°C. All Arabidopsis plants grew under a 16h light/8h dark photoperiod, and 65% relative humidity.

Histochemical GUS staining

The GUS assay was performed as described by Jefferson [31]. For each AhLEC1A promoter-GUS construct, at least thirty plants of T2 generation lines in five transgenic events were used for GUS histochemical staining. The roots and leaves at the 4-leaf stage, stems at the bolting stage, flowers, immature embryos of 6–10 days after pollination and 3-5day etiolated and de-etiolated seedlings in transgenic T2 lines were incubated in GUS assay buffer with 50mM sodium phosphate(7.0), 0.5mM K3Fe(CN)6, 0.5mM K4Fe(CN)6·3H2O, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 1mM X-Gluc at 37°C overnight and then cleared with 70% ethanol. The samples were examined by stereomicroscopy.

Results

Isolation of the promoter of AhLEC1A and localization of TSS

The 2739bp DNA fragment was amplified by two rounds of PCR using the method of genome walking. Its sequence analysis found that this fragment includes 2707bp of 5’ flanking region upstream from ATG and 32bp of coding sequence (Fig 1). In order to determine the transcription start site (TSS) of AhLEC1A gene, the nested 5’ RACE was performed to amplify the 5’-end of its cDNA. The 140bp of cDNA fragment, including the 58bp of coding region started from ATG and 82bp 5’ UTR, was isolated (Fig 2). Compared with the gDNA sequence of AhLEC1A, the sequence of 82bp 5’ UTR was identical to the 5’ upstream sequence of its gDNA, suggesting that the “A” located at the 82th nucleotid (nt) upstream from ATG is the TSS of AhLEC1A gene.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. PCR amplification of 5’ flanking regulation regions of peanut AhLEC1A gene by chromosome walking.

LD, LE, LP and LS represents the second amplification with different primary product as template respectively. The arrow indicates the targeted band for further cloning and sequencing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Localization of transcription start site of peanut AhLEC1A gene using 5’ RACE.

1-The products of the first round PCR; 2-The products of the second round PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.g002

Analysis of cis-regulatory elements in AhLEC1A promoter sequence

In silico analysis of 2707bp 5’ flanking region revealed that a number of putative cis-elements were present in the 2625bp of promoter region and 82bp of 5’ UTR (Fig 3). In detail, the basic promoter elements, TATA box (TATATAT) and CAAT box (CAAAT)), respectively placed at -36 ~ -30 nt and -143 ~ -148 nt. Many crucial elements required for embryo- or endosperm-specific expression and seed storage compounds accumulation scattered over the promoter, including two SKn-1 motifs (GTCAT) at -84 ~ -80 nt and -475 ~ -479 nt, two CANBANAPA elements (CNAACAC) at -442 ~ -448 nt and -1597 ~ -1603 nt, and three binding sites for AGL15 (CWWWWWWWWG) at -1245 ~ -1236 nt, -2079 ~ -2070 nt and -2272 ~ -2263 nt. In addition, four DPBFCOREDCDC3 elements (ACACNNG), previously considered to involve in embryo-specific expression and also to respond to ABA were found at -111 ~ -117 nt, -445 ~ -451 nt, -1321 ~ -1327 nt and -1330 ~ -1324 nt. We have also detected many other regulatory elements for the accumulation of seed storage compounds and embryogenesis. For instance, eight EBOX BNNAPA (CANNTG), two 2S SEED PROT BANAPA (CAAACAC) and one SEF3 MOTIF GM (AACCCA). Besides, there were some elements associated with regulating in vegetative organ development on the promoter, such as mesophyll-specific element CACTFTPPCA1 (YACT), root-specific element ROOTMOTIFTAPOX1 (ATATT) and so on. There also exist some elements involved in light responsiveness including more than a dozen I BOX (GATAA) at -366 ~ -362 nt, -372 ~ -368 nt, -405 ~ -401 nt, -357 ~ -353 nt, -511 ~ -507 nt, -810 ~ -806 nt, -905 ~ -901 nt, -913 ~ -909 nt, -983 ~ -979 nt, -1793 ~ -1789 nt, -1916 ~ -1912 nt, and -1946 ~ -1942 nt, three -10PEHVPSBD (TATTCT) at -437 ~ -432 nt, -2584 ~ -2579 nt, and -2606 ~ -2601 nt, and one TCT-motif (TCTTAC) at -830 ~ -835 nt, etc., and some other regulatory elements controlling the chloroplast genes expression, like one GT1 MOTIF PSRBCS (KWGTGRWAAWRW) at -137 ~ -126 nt, and two etiolation-induced expression elements ACGT ATERD1 (ACGT) at -122 ~ -119 nt, and -1334 ~ -1337 nt. We also identified thirteen negative regulatory elements in the promoter, among which five WBOXATNPR1 elements located in -1255 ~ -2228 nt region (-1613 ~ -1616 nt, -1649 ~ -1652 nt, -1953 ~ -1956 nt, -2144 ~ -2147 nt, and -2156 ~ -2159 nt), and four WRKY71OS elements densely distributed between the region of -2228 to -2625 nt.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. The sequence of 5’ flanking regulation region of peanut AhLEC1A gene and some major elements harbored in this region.

The letter “A” in box represents its transcription start site (TSS), the putative regulatory elements are highlighted by underling or italicizing, and the sequences of primers P1-P8 are shading.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.g003

Functional analysis of the regulatory regions of the AhLEC1A promoter

To validate the role of the crucial regulatory region in AhLEC1A promoter, a series of GUS expression vectors (Q1~ Q7) (Fig 4), driven by different length of the promoters with truncated 5’ terminal were established, and the GUS expression patterns in stable transgenic plants of Arabidopsis was investigated. In the histochemical assay, GUS expression was visualized specifically in the developing embryos of transgenic plants containing Q7 construct (including 2228bp promoter region and 82bp 5’ UTR, Fig 5). The result of AhLEC1A expression analysis by qRT-PCR also showed that its transcripts were higher in seeds, but lower or rarely in roots, stems, leaves and flowers (S1 Fig) Otherwise, the GUS staining was observed in all detected organs of transgenic plants carrying Q3, Q4, Q5, and Q6 construct (Fig 5). These four promoter segments are respectively 617bp, 721bp, 935bp and 1254bp in size with 5’ terminal deletion of 1611bp ~ 974bp. It was suggested that there exist some key motifs in the promoter region between -2228bp and -1255bp, which related to inhibit the expression in the other organs except for the developing seeds. Moreover, the further deletional promoter fragment Q2 with 354bp drove the GUS to express only in embryos and rosette leaves. The shortest fragment Q1 containing 105bp promoter region and 82bp 5’ UTR couldn’t drive the GUS to express in any detected organs of transgenic Arabidopsis (Fig 5), implying that it might be caused by the deletion of the necessary component for gene expression.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. The vector diagram expressing GUS in plants driven by different length AhLEC1A promoters with 5’ terminal deletion.

Q1~Q7 indicates its promoters with different length. The rectangles in light and dark gray respectively show the promoter region upstream of the TSS, and the 5’ UTR region of gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.g004

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. GUS Histochemical staining of different organs in transgenic Arabidopsis.

Q1~Q7 respectively shows the GUS expression patterns in flower, stem and cauline leaf, and rosette leaf and root harboring different GUS expression structures, and the CK-N and CK-P respectively show the GUS expression profiles in COL, and in positive control harboring 35S::GUS constructs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.g005

To explore the role of AhLEC1A on seedling establishment, the transgenic lines with Q7, Q5, Q3 and Q2 constructs were chosen for further analysis. Transgenic Arabidopsis seeds were kept in the dark till their germinating. The results of GUS staining indicated that the unexpanded cotyledon and apex hook of the seedlings harboring Q7 or Q5 construct showed dark blue color, and the hypocotyls were light blue. However, after the etiolated transgenic seedlings had been moved to the light for 2 days, the plants with Q7 construct hardly got dyed, and only the expanded cotyledons with Q5 construct were stained blue. By contrast, the whole seedlings with Q3 or Q2 construct were dyed dark blue under both growth conditions (Fig 6). The results suggested that there existed some negatively regulatory elements at the region of -2228bp ~ -618bp in AhLEC1A promoter to control the expression of AhLEC1A in hypocotyls and radicles at the stage of seedling formation, and some of them mentioned above might associate with light response.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 6. GUS staining of the seedlings germinated for 3~5d in transgenic Arabidopsis.

Q2, Q3, Q5 and Q7 indicate respectively the GUS expression patterns in transgenic Arabidopsis lines harboring different GUS expression structures. CK-N and CK-P indicate the GUS expression profiles in COL and in positive control harboring 35S::GUS construct, respectively. A-F indicate the seedlings germinated for 3d in dark, and G-L represent the seedlings after transferring from dark to light for 2 days.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.g006

Discussion

Identifying and characterizing the 5’ flanking region of gene is helpful for revealing its temporal and spatial expression pattern, and facilitating its utilization in plant genetic engineering [32]. In the present study, we have cloned and analyzed the 5’ flanking regulatory sequence of AhLEC1A. Several cis-elements in AhLEC1A promoter, such as SKn-1, CANBANAPA (CA)n, AGL15, DOF core, SEF3 motif and the like, which previously were demonstrated to be required for seed development and storage accumulation, were identified. Skn-1 motif and (CA)n element were reported to play a vital role in determining the seed-specific expression; the deletion of Skn-1 motif or (CA)n element in glutelin and napin promoter decreased their transcription in seeds [33, 34]. The element of DOF core was considered to confer the endosperm-specific expression in Zea mays [35, 36]. SEF3 motif is the binding site of Soybean Embryo Factor 3, which regulate the transcription of the β-conglycinin (a storage protein) gene and participate in seed development [37, 38]. Our results of GUS staining assay revealed GUS gene, driven by the longest AhLEC1A promoter (Q7), specially expressed in the embryos of the transgenic Arabidopsis, which is well in agreement with our results of gene expression analyzed by qRT-PCR method (S1 Fig). These data showed that AhLEC1A functioned in a seed-specific manner. Otherwise, the transgenic lines with 1611bp ~ 974bp deletion constructs from 5’ terminal of Q7 promoter showed the constitutive expression at higher GUS levels in roots, rosettes, stems, flowers, and seeds. Meanwhile, in silico analysis of AhLEC1A promoter displayed several tissue-specific elements like mesophyll-specific element CACTFTPPCA1, root-specific element ROOTMOTIFTAPOX1 and pollen-specific element POLLEN1LELAT52 distributed on its upstream regulatory region, as well as many negatively regulatory elements including four WRKY71OS and five WBOXATNPR1 dispersed intensively in the fragment of -1225 ~ -2228bp which was deleted in Q3 ~ Q6. These results demonstrate that AhLEC1A expression in seed-specific pattern might be attributed to be negatively regulated its transcription in vegetative organs by some cis-element existed in the distal region of its promoter, and simultaneously to be controlled its expression in seeds positively by some seed-specific elements in the proximal region of its promoter. This regulatory model was also found in AtLEC1 promoter of Arabidopsis [27], D540 promoter of rice [39], and C-hordein promoter of barley [40].

Beyond embryogenesis and embryo development, LEC1 also regulate skotomorphogenesis of seedlings at the post-germination stage. The unexpanded cotyledons and apical hook of seedlings with Q7 construct germinated in dark dyed obviously in blue, while the whole seedlings were scarely stained after transferring to light for 2 days. It was suggested that light might repress the expression of AhLEC1A by recruiting some proteins to bind the particular elements in its promoter. Our results found that total 23 light-responsive elements I BOX CORE/GATA BOX (GATA) scattered on Q7 segment of AhLEC1A promoter, 9, 15 and 21 out of them were respectively deleted in Q5, Q3 and Q2 promoter, resulting in that in GUS assay, the staining patterns of Q2 and Q3 transgenic plants in darkness were similar to those in light, and the hypocotyls of Q5 transgenic plants were dyed in blue when growing in darkness while there were no dyeing after transferring them to light. The core sequence of I BOX, and the GATA BOX with similar function had been shown to be essential for light-regulated transcriptional activation [41–43]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that I BOX as a negative cis-element can inhibit the expression of GalUR in strawberry, and the inhibited role is strictly depended on light [44]. Yamagata et al. also found that I BOX, as a negative regulatory element, was necessary for down-regulating the expression of cucumisin gene by binding fruit nuclear protein in Musc melons (Cucumis melo L.) [45]. Previous study found that AtLEC1 promoter exists several I BOX CORE elements, and deleting some of them localized on 5’ upstream segment from -436 nt in mutant tnp restrains the hypocotyl elongation of etiolated seedlings in darkness [27]. These data suggested that some of I BOX elements function as a negative regulator in response to illumination. In our GUS histochemical assay, the degree and range of dyeing changed with the number of I BOX, demonstrating that some of them might be involved in negative regulating the expression of AhLEC1A gene during the procedure of seedling growth from dark condition to light condition.

The cis- elements comparison in the promoters of AhLEC1A and AhLEC1B showed that lots of similar elements are dispersed in the both promoters, but their amounts and positions were much different (Table 2). AhLEC1A promoter contained a number of distinct seed-development related components such as 2S SEED PROT BANAPA, SP8BFIBSP8BIB, CANBNNAPA. However, AhLEC1B promoter contained numerous specific elements involved in abiotic stress or hormones responding, including GCCCORE, ASF1MOTIFCAWV, and several regulatory elements known to modulate gene expression at higher transcription level in different plant species [46]. The similarities and differences between two AhLEC1 promoters implied that their functions might be partially same and redundant, and to some extent AhLEC1A and AhLEC1B might play different roles during the particular growth and development period of peanuts, respectively. The point of view was consistent with the study of predecessors who thought LEC1 genes originated from a common ancestor and neofunctionalization and /or subfunctionalization processes were responsible for the emergence of a different role for LEC1 genes in seeds plants [47]. Moreover, during the evolution of cultivated peanuts, A and B subgenomes were subjected to asymmetric homoeologous exchanges and homoeolog expression bias. Yin et al. considered that A subgenome were significantly affected by domestication, while natural selection preferred to B subgenome [48]. It was speculated that during genome evolution, to satisfy the demands for seed growth and development, the orthologous genes AhLEC1A and AhLEC1B suffered from the different selection pressure at different life stages to produce their functional divergence.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Comparison of regulatory elements in AhLEC1A promoter and AhLEC1B promoter.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.t002

In summary, we identified and characterized the promoter of AhLEC1A. It was found that during the process of seed development and maturation, its expression in embryo were regulated by the positive cis-elements in seed-specific mode and the negative elements restricting its expression in other organs. Moreover, AhLEC1A was also involved in skotomorphogenesis of peanut seeds, its expression level in the hypocotyls germinated in darkness was inhibited by some light-responsive elements. The results will be helpful for understanding the function of AhLEC1A in peanuts.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Expression patterns of AhLEC1A in different organs.

The transcription levels of AhLEC1A mRNA in various organs were analyzed by qRT-PCR with AhACTIN 7 as internal referent gene. R: Roots; St: Stems; L: Leaves; F: Flowers; S: Seeds after pegging for 30 d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.s001

(TIF)

S1 Raw images.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949.s002

(PDF)

Citation: Tang G, Xu P, Li P, Zhu J, Chen G, Shan L, et al. (2021) Cloning and functional characterization of seed-specific LEC1A promoter from peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). PLoS ONE 16(3): e0242949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242949

References

1. Goldberg RB, de Paiva G, Yadegari R. Plant embryogenesis: zygote to seed. Science. 1994; 266(5185): 605–614. pmid:17793455

2. Gutierrez L, Van Wuytswinkel O, Castelain M, Bellini C. Combined networks regulating seed maturation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007; 12(7): 294–300. pmid:17588801

3. Harada JJ, Pelletier J. Genome-wide analyses of gene activity during seed development. Seed ence Research. 2012; 22(S1): S15–S22.

4. Braybrook SA, Harada JJ. LECs go crazy in embryo development. Trends Plant Sci. 2008; 13(12): 624–630. pmid:19010711

5. Santos-Mendoza M, Dubreucq B, Baud S, Parcy F, Caboche M, Lepiniec L. Deciphering gene regulatory networks that control seed development and maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008; 54(4): 608–620. pmid:18476867

6. Verdier J, Thompson RD. Transcriptional regulation of storage protein synthesis during dicotyledon seed filling. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008; 49(9): 1263–1271. pmid:18701524

7. Roscoe TT, Guilleminot J, Bessoule JJ, Berger F, Devic M. Complementation of Seed Maturation Phenotypes by Ectopic Expression of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3, FUSCA3 and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56(6): 1215–1228. pmid:25840088

8. West M, Yee KM, Danao J, Zimmerman JL, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, et al. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 Is an Essential Regulator of Late Embryogenesis and Cotyledon Identity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1994; 6(12): 1731–1745. pmid:12244233

9. Lotan T, Ohto M, Yee KM, West MA, Lo R, Kwong RW, et al. Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell. 1998; 93(7): 1195–1205. pmid:9657152

10. Harada JJ. Role of Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON genes in seed development. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2001; 158(4): 405–409.

11. Calvenzani V, Testoni B, Gusmaroli G, Lorenzo M, Gnesutta N, Petroni K, et al. Interactions and CCAAT-binding of Arabidopsis thaliana NF-Y subunits. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e42902. pmid:22912760

12. Meinke DW. A Homoeotic Mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana with Leafy Cotyledons. Science. 1992; 258(5088): 1647–1650. pmid:17742538

13. Meinke DW, Franzmann LH, Nickle TC, Yeung EC. Leafy Cotyledon Mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1994; 6(8): 1049–1064. pmid:12244265

14. Junker A, Mönke G, Rutten T, Keilwagen J, Seifert M, Thi TM, et al. Elongation-related functions of LEAFY COTYLEDON1 during the development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2012; 71(3): 427–442. pmid:22429691

15. Pelletier JM, Kwong RW, Park S, Le BH, Baden R, Cagliari A, et al. LEC1 sequentially regulates the transcription of genes involved in diverse developmental processes during seed development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(32): E6710–e6719. pmid:28739919

16. Kagaya Y, Toyoshima R, Okuda R, Usui H, Yamamoto A, Hattori T. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 controls seed storage protein genes through its regulation of FUSCA3 and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005; 46(3): 399–406. pmid:15695450

17. Mu JY, Tan HL, Zheng Q, Fu FY, Liang Y, J Z. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is a key regulator of fatty acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008; 148(2): 1042–1054. pmid:18689444

18. Tan HL, Yang XH, Zhang F, Zheng X, Qu CM, Mu JY, et al. Enhanced seed oil production in canola by conditional expression of Brassica napus LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and LEC1-LIKE in developing seeds. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156(3): 1577–1588. pmid:21562329

19. Elahi N, Duncan RW, Stasolla C. Modification of oil and glucosinolate content in canola seeds with altered expression of Brassica napus LEAFY COTYLEDON1. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016; 100: 52–63. pmid:26773545

20. Tang GY, Xu PL, Ma WH, Wang F, Liu ZJ, Wan SB, et al. Seed-Specific Expression of AtLEC1 Increased Oil Content and Altered Fatty Acid Composition in Seeds of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9: 260. pmid:29559985

21. Baud S, Kelemen Z, Thévenin J, Boulard C, Blanchet S, To A, et al. Deciphering the molecular mechanisms underpinning the transcriptional control of gene expression by master transcriptional regulators in Arabidopsis seed. Plant Physiol. 2016;171(6): 1099–1112. pmid:27208266

22. Jo L, Pelletier JM, Hsu SW, Baden R, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ. Combinatorial interactions of the LEC1 transcription factor specify diverse developmental programs during soybean seed development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117 (2): 1223–1232. pmid:31892538

23. Brocard-Gifford IM, Lynch TJ, Finkelstein RR. Regulatory networks in seeds integrating developmental, abscisic acid, sugar, and light signaling. Plant Physiol. 2003; 131(1): 78–92. pmid:12529517

24. Warpeha KM, Upadhyay S, Yeh J, Adamiak J, Hawkins SI, Lapik YR, et al. The GCR1, GPA1, PRN1, NF-Y signal chain mediates both blue light and abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007; 143(4): 1590–1600. pmid:17322342

25. Siefers N, Dang KK, Kumimoto RW, Bynum WEt, Tayrose G, Holt BF 3rd. Tissue-specific expression patterns of Arabidopsis NF-Y transcription factors suggest potential for extensive combinatorial complexity. Plant Physiol. 2009; 149(2): 625–641. pmid:19019982

26. Huang MK, Hu YL, Liu X, Li YG, Hou XL. Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 Mediates Postembryonic Development via Interacting with PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR4. Plant Cell. 2015; 27(11): 3099–3111. pmid:26566918

27. Casson SA, Lindsey K. The turnip mutant of Arabidopsis reveals that LEAFY COTYLEDON1 expression mediates the effects of auxin and sugars to promote embryonic cell identity. Plant Physiol. 2006; 142(2): 526–541. pmid:16935993

28. Murray MG, Thompson WF. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980; 8(19): 4321–4325. pmid:7433111

29. Chen G, Shan L, Zhou LX, Tang GY, Bi YP. The Comparison of Different Methods for Isolating Total RNA from Peanuts. Chinese Agricultural ence Bulletin. 2011; 27(1): 214–218.

30. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001; 25(4):402–408. pmid:11846609

31. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. Embo j. 1987; 6(13): 3901–3907. pmid:3327686

32. Ayoubi TA, Van De Ven WJ. Regulation of gene expression by alternative promoters. Faseb j. 1996; 10(4): 453–460. pmid:8647344

33. Bustos MM, Begum D, Kalkan FA, Battraw MJ, Hall TC. Positive and negative cis-acting DNA domains are required for spatial and temporal regulation of gene expression by a seed storage protein promoter. Embo j. 1991; 10(6): 1469–1479. pmid:2026144

34. Washida H, Wu CY, Suzuki A, Yamanouchi U, Akihama T, Harada K, et al. Identification of cis-regulatory elements required for endosperm expression of the rice storage protein glutelin gene GluB-1. Plant Mol Biol. 1999; 40(1): 1–12. pmid:10394940

35. Yanagisawa S. Dof1 and Dof2 transcription factors are associated with expression of multiple genes involved in carbon metabolism in maize. Plant J. 2000; 21(3): 281–288. pmid:10758479

36. Yanagisawa S, Schmidt RJ. Diversity and similarity among recognition sequences of Dof transcription factors. Plant J. 1999; 17(2): 209–214. pmid:10074718

37. Lessard PA, Allen RD, Bernier F, Crispino JD, Fujiwara T, Beachy RN. Multiple nuclear factors interact with upstream sequences of differentially regulated beta-conglycinin genes. Plant Mol Biol. 1991; 16(3): 397–413. pmid:1893110

38. Allen RD, Bernier F, Lessard PA, Beachy RN. Nuclear factors interact with a soybean beta-conglycinin enhancer. Plant Cell. 1989; 1(6): 623–631. pmid:2535514

39. Cai M, Wei J, Li XH, Xu CG, Wang SP. A rice promoter containing both novel positive and negative cis-elements for regulation of green tissue-specific gene expression in transgenic plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007; 5(5): 664–674. pmid:17596180

40. Müller M, Knudsen S. The nitrogen response of a barley C-hordein promoter is controlled by positive and negative regulation of the GCN4 and endosperm box. Plant J. 1993; 4(2): 343–355. pmid:8220485

41. Borello U, Ceccarelli E, Giuliano G. Constitutive, light-responsive and circadian clock-responsive factors compete for the different l box elements in plant light-regulated promoters. Plant J. 1993; 4(4): 611–619. pmid:8252065

42. Reyes JC, Muro-Pastor MI, Florencio FJ. The GATA family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2004; 134(4): 1718–1732. pmid:15084732

43. Terzaghi WB, Cashmore AR. Light-Regulated Transcription. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1995; 46(1): 445–474.

44. Agius F, Amaya I, Botella MA, Valpuesta V. Functional analysis of homologous and heterologous promoters in strawberry fruits using transient expression. J Exp Bot. 2005; 56(409): 37–46. pmid:15533885

45. Yamagata H, Yonesu K, Hirata A, Aizono Y. TGTCACA motif is a novel cis-regulatory enhancer element involved in fruit-specific expression of the cucumisin gene. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277(13): 11582–11590. pmid:11782472

46. Tang G, Xu P, Liu W, Liu Z, Shan L. Cloning and Characterization of 5’ Flanking Regulatory Sequences of AhLEC1B Gene from Arachis Hypogaea L. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10): e0139213. pmid:26426444

47. Cagliari A, Turchetto-Zolet AC, Korbes AP, Maraschin Fdos S, Margis R, Margis-Pinheiro M. New insights on the evolution of Leafy cotyledon1 (LEC1) type genes in vascular plants. Genomics. 2014; 103(5–6): 380–387. pmid:24704532

48. Yin D, Ji C, Song Q, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhao K, et al. Comparison of Arachis monticola with Diploid and Cultivated Tetraploid Genomes Reveals Asymmetric Subgenome Evolution and Improvement of Peanut. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020; 7(4): 1901672. pmid:32099754

49. Takaiwa F, Oono K, Wing D, Kato A. Sequence of three members and expression of a new major subfamily of glutelin genes from rice. Plant Mol Biol. 1991; 17(4): 875–885. pmid:1680490

50. Tang W, Perry SE. Binding site selection for the plant MADS domain protein AGL15: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(30): 28154–28159. pmid:12743119

51. Gowik U, Burscheidt J, Akyildiz M, Schlue U, Koczor M, Streubel M, et al. cis-Regulatory elements for mesophyll-specific gene expression in the C4 plant Flaveria trinervia, the promoter of the C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene. Plant Cell. 2004; 16(5): 1077–1090. pmid:15100398

52. Thum KE, Kim M, Morishige DT, Eibl C, Koop HU, Mullet JE. Analysis of barley chloroplast psbD light-responsive promoter elements in transplastomic tobacco. Plant Mol Biol. 2001; 47(3): 353–366. pmid:11587507

53. Elmayan T, Tepfer M. Evaluation in tobacco of the organ specificity and strength of the rolD promoter, domain A of the 35S promoter and the 35S2 promoter. Transgenic Res. 1995; 4(6): 388–396. pmid:7581519

54. Filichkin SA, Leonard JM, Monteros A, Liu PP, Nonogaki H. A novel endo-beta-mannanase gene in tomato LeMAN5 is associated with anther and pollen development. Plant Physiol. 2004; 134(3): 1080–1087. pmid:14976239

55. Zhang ZL, Xie Z, Zou X, Casaretto J, Ho TH, Shen QJ. A rice WRKY gene encodes a transcriptional repressor of the gibberellin signaling pathway in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 2004; 134(4): 1500–1513. pmid:15047897

56. Chen C, Chen Z. Potentiation of developmentally regulated plant defense response by AtWRKY18, a pathogen-induced Arabidopsis transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2002; 129(2): 706–716. pmid:12068113

57. Fusada N, Masuda T, Kuroda H, Shimada H, Ohta H, Takamiya K. Identification of a novel cis-element exhibiting cytokinin-dependent protein binding in vitro in the 5’-region of NADPH-protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase gene in cucumber. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 59(4): 631–645. pmid:16244912

58. Stålberg K, Ellerstöm M, Ezcurra I, Ablov S, Rask L. Disruption of an overlapping E-box/ABRE motif abolished high transcription of the napA storage-protein promoter in transgenic Brassica napus seeds. Planta. 1996; 199(4): 515–519. pmid:8818291

59. Tapia G, Verdugo I, Yañez M, Ahumada I, Theoduloz C, Cordero C, et al. Involvement of ethylene in stress-induced expression of the TLC1.1 retrotransposon from Lycopersicon chilense Dun. Plant Physiol. 2005; 138(4): 2075–2086. pmid:16040666

60. Hagen G, Guilfoyle T. Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors. Plant Mol Biol. 2002; 49(3–4): 373–385. pmid:12036261

61. Welsch R, Medina J, Giuliano G, Beyer P, Von Lintig J. Structural and functional characterization of the phytoene synthase promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta. 2003; 216(3): 523–534. pmid:12520345

62. Rawat R, Xu ZF, Yao KM, Chye ML. Identification of cis-elements for ethylene and circadian regulation of the Solanum melongena gene encoding cysteine proteinase. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 57(5): 629–643. pmid:15988560

63. Ogawa M, Hanada A, Yamauchi Y, Kuwahara A, Kamiya Y, Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin biosynthesis and response during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant Cell. 2003; 15(7): 1591–1604. pmid:12837949

64. Ishiguro S, Nakamura K. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1, that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5’ upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and beta-amylase from sweet potato. Mol Gen Genet. 1994; 244(6): 563–571. pmid:7969025

65. Luo QL, Li YG, Gu HQ, Zhao L, Gu XP, Li WB. The promoter of soybean photoreceptor GmPLP1 gene enhances gene expression under plant growth regulator and light stresses. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2013; 114(1): 109–119.

66. Redman J, Whitcraft J, Johnson C, Arias J. Abiotic and biotic stress differentially stimulate as-1 element activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reports. 2002; 21(2): 180–185.

67. Chakravarthy S, Tuori RP, D’Ascenzo MD, Fobert PR, Despres C, Martin GB. The tomato transcription factor Pti4 regulates defense-related gene expression via GCC box and non-GCC box cis elements. Plant Cell. 2003; 15(12): 3033–3050. pmid:14630974

68. Yamauchi D. A TGACGT motif in the 5’-upstream region of alpha-amylase gene from Vigna mungo is a cis-element for expression in cotyledons of germinated seeds. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001; 42(6): 635–641. pmid:11427683

69. Ye J, Li WF, Ai G, Li CX, Liu GZ, Chen WF, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies a natural variation in basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor regulating ascorbate biosynthesis via D-mannose/L-galactose pathway in tomato. PLoS Genet. 2019; 15(5): e1008149. pmid:31067226

70. Wang Y, Liu GJ, Yan XF, Wei ZG, Xu ZR. MeJA-inducible expression of the heterologous JAZ2 promoter from Arabidopsis in Populus trichocarpa protoplasts. J PLANT DIS PROTECT. 2011.

71. Jin B, Sheng ZL, Ishfaq M, Chen JQ, Yang HL. Cloning and functional analysis of the promoter of a stress-inducible gene (Zmap) in maize. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2): e0211941. pmid:30735543

72. Sutoh K, Yamauchi D. Two cis-acting elements necessary and sufficient for gibberellin-upregulated proteinase expression in rice seeds. Plant J. 2003; 34(5): 635–645. pmid:12787245