It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The peak particle velocity (PPV) is an important indicator for predicting blasting excavation disturbances. However, the PPV distribution in the deep underground space is significantly different from that on the outdoor ground. Therefore, it is difficult to predict the underground PPV by Sadovsky’s vibration formula. The PPV sidewall distribution characteristics were studied during site blasting in an underground cavern in the Taohuazui mine in China, and a similar numerical model was used to verify the site test data. We derived a PPV prediction formula for the underground cavern sidewall surrounding rock using a mechanical analysis model of a simply supported plate and beam in combination with dimensional analysis. The model considered derived boundary constraints, comparison with site measured data, the value predicted by Sadovsky’s vibration formula, and numerical simulation results. The results showed that the PPV distribution on the middle 1/3 section of the underground cavern sidewall showed a “platform” or “bulge” different from the curve from Sadovsky’s vibration formula. The PPV amplification coefficient in this section was distributed in a drum shape. The PPV prediction formula for the middle section of the sidewall derived in this paper was highly consistent with the data measured on-site and the numerical simulation results. The mechanical analysis model with a simply supported plate and beam included an underground cavern sidewall length–height ratio of 5 and effectively supplemented the PPV prediction formula for the middle section of the traditional underground cavern sidewall.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Road-Bridge and Structure Engineering, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.162110.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9291 3229)
2 Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Road-Bridge and Structure Engineering, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.162110.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9291 3229); Wuhan University of Technology, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.162110.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9291 3229)
3 Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Road-Bridge and Structure Engineering, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.162110.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9291 3229); Wuhan University of Technology, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.162110.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9291 3229); Wuhan University of Technology, School of Safety Science and Emergency Management, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.162110.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9291 3229)
4 Wuhan University of Technology, School of Safety Science and Emergency Management, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.162110.5) (ISNI:0000 0000 9291 3229)