It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Quantum systems are promising candidates for sensing of weak signals as they can be highly sensitive to external perturbations, thus providing excellent performance when estimating parameters of external fields. However, when trying to detect weak signals that are hidden by background noise, the signal-to-noise ratio is a more relevant metric than raw sensitivity. We identify, under modest assumptions about the statistical properties of the signal and noise, the optimal quantum control to detect an external signal in the presence of background noise using a quantum sensor. Interestingly, for white background noise, the optimal solution is the simple and well-known spin-locking control scheme. Using numerical techniques, we further generalize these results to the case of background noise with a Lorentzian spectrum. We show that for increasing correlation time, pulse based sequences, such as CPMG, are also close to the optimal control for detecting the signal, with the crossover dependent on the signal frequency. These results show that an optimal detection scheme can be easily implemented in near-term quantum sensors without the need for complicated pulse shaping.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, USA (GRID:grid.474430.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0630 1170); NIST/University of Maryland, Joint Quantum Institute, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.94225.38) (ISNI:000000012158463X)
2 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, USA (GRID:grid.474430.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0630 1170)
3 NIST/University of Maryland, Joint Quantum Institute, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.94225.38) (ISNI:000000012158463X); NIST/University of Maryland, Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.94225.38) (ISNI:000000012158463X); University of Maryland, Department of Physics, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.164295.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 7177)