It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The increase of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and lack of new classes of licensed antimicrobials, have made alternative treatment options for AMR pathogens increasingly attractive. Recent studies have demonstrated anti-bacterial efficacy of a humanised monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the O25b O-antigen of Escherichia coli ST131. To evaluate the phenotypic effects of antibody binding to diverse clinical E. coli ST131 O25b bacterial isolates in high-throughput, we designed a novel mAb screening method using high-content imaging (HCI) and image-based morphological profiling to screen a mAb targeting the O25b O-antigen. Screening the antibody against a panel of 86 clinical E. coli ST131 O25:H4 isolates revealed 4 binding phenotypes: no binding (18.60%), weak binding (4.65%), strong binding (69.77%) and strong agglutinating binding (6.98%). Impaired antibody binding could be explained by the presence of insertion sequences or mutations in O-antigen or lipopolysaccharide core biosynthesis genes, affecting the amount, structure or chain length of the O-antigen. The agglutinating binding phenotype was linked with lower O-antigen density, enhanced antibody-mediated phagocytosis and increased serum susceptibly. This study highlights the need to screen candidate mAbs against large panels of clinically relevant isolates, and that HCI can be used to evaluate mAb binding affinity and potential functional efficacy against AMR bacteria.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
2 University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); Monash University, Department of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857); London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.8991.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0425 469X)
3 Kymab Ltd, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.479336.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 4670 699X)
4 Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK (GRID:grid.10306.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0606 5382)
5 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.8991.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0425 469X)
6 Kymab Ltd, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.479336.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 4670 699X); Imperial College London, Department of Infectious Disease, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)