It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ideal methods for detecting pathogens should be sensitive, specific, rapid, cost-effective and instrument-free. Conventional nucleic acid pathogen detection strategies, mostly PCR-based techniques, have various limitations, such as expensive equipment, reagents and skilled performance. Recently, CRISPR/Cas-based methods have burst onto the scene, with the potential to power the pathogen detection field. Here we introduce these unique methods and discuss its hurdles and promises.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
2 Suzhou Maximum Bio-tech Co., Ltd., Suzhou, People’s Republic of China
3 School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China