It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
While Delta non-autonomously activates Notch in neighboring cells, it autonomously inactivates Notch through cis-inhibition, the molecular mechanism and biological roles of which remain elusive. The wave of differentiation in the Drosophila brain, the ‘proneural wave’, is an excellent model for studying Notch signaling in vivo. Here, we show that strong nonlinearity in cis-inhibition reproduces the second peak of Notch activity behind the proneural wave in silico. Based on this, we demonstrate that Delta expression induces a quick degradation of Notch in late endosomes and the formation of the twin peaks of Notch activity in vivo. Indeed, the amount of Notch is upregulated and the twin peaks are fused forming a single peak when the function of Delta or late endosomes is compromised. Additionally, we show that the second Notch peak behind the wavefront controls neurogenesis. Thus, intracellular trafficking of Notch orchestrates the temporal dynamics of Notch activity and the temporal patterning of neurogenesis.
During Drosophila development, two peaks of Notch activity propagate across the neuroepithelium to generate neuroblasts. Here, the authors show Notch cis-inhibition under the control of intracellular Notch trafficking establishes these two peaks, which temporally control neurogenesis in the brain.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Kanazawa University, Mathematical Neuroscience Unit, Institute for Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa, Japan (GRID:grid.9707.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 3329)
2 Kanazawa University, Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan (GRID:grid.9707.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 3329)
3 Hokkaido University, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Sapporo, Japan (GRID:grid.39158.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 7691)
4 Hokkaido University, Research Institute for Electronic Science, Research Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Sapporo, Japan (GRID:grid.39158.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 7691)
5 Future University Hakodate, Department of Complex and Intelligent Systems, School of Systems Information Science, Hakodate, Japan (GRID:grid.440872.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0640 7610)
6 Kanazawa University, Mathematical Neuroscience Unit, Institute for Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa, Japan (GRID:grid.9707.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 3329); Kanazawa University, Laboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan (GRID:grid.9707.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 3329)