It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Wildfires are a major disturbance to forest carbon (C) balance through both immediate combustion emissions and post-fire ecosystem dynamics. Here we used a process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), to simulate C budget in Alaska and Canada during 1986–2016, as impacted by fire disturbances. We extracted the data of difference Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) for fires from Landsat TM/ETM imagery and estimated the proportion of vegetation and soil C combustion. We observed that the region was a C source of 2.74 Pg C during the 31-year period. The observed C loss, 57.1 Tg C year−1, was attributed to fire emissions, overwhelming the net ecosystem production (1.9 Tg C year−1) in the region. Our simulated direct emissions for Alaska and Canada are within the range of field measurements and other model estimates. As burn severity increased, combustion emission tended to switch from vegetation origin towards soil origin. When dNBR is below 300, fires increase soil temperature and decrease soil moisture and thus, enhance soil respiration. However, the post-fire soil respiration decreases for moderate or high burn severity. The proportion of post-fire soil emission in total emissions increased with burn severity. Net nitrogen mineralization gradually recovered after fire, enhancing net primary production. Net ecosystem production recovered fast under higher burn severities. The impact of fire disturbance on the C balance of northern ecosystems and the associated uncertainties can be better characterized with long-term, prior-, during- and post-disturbance data across the geospatial spectrum. Our findings suggest that the regional source of carbon to the atmosphere will persist if the observed forest wildfire occurrence and severity continues into the future.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Purdue University, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197)
2 Purdue University, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197); Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197)
3 Production Systems - Milk Production Unit, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Maaninka, Finland (GRID:grid.22642.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 4668 6757)
4 University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071)
5 University of Eastern Finland, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Joensuu, Finland (GRID:grid.9668.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0726 2490)
6 University of Eastern Finland, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio, Finland (GRID:grid.9668.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0726 2490)